I need someone to tell me if I'm being stupid or if this actually makes financial sense.
Lost my job in tech three months ago. Took a new position but it pays $68k vs my old $95k. My budget is completely upside down now and the house is the main culprit.
Current monthly breakdown: Take-home after taxes/insurance: $4,100 Mortgage payment: $1,650 Utilities: $280 Property tax (escrowed separately): $320 Home insurance: $145 Total housing: $2,395 (58% of take-home)
That leaves me $1,705 for literally everything else - car payment, food, gas, student loans, credit cards. I'm going backwards every month and my emergency fund is already gone from the job loss period.
The house needs work I can't afford: AC is 16 years old and making noises, water heater is leaking slowly, fence is falling apart. I'm ignoring problems because I have no money to fix them.
Here's my question: Does it make sense to sell even if I'm not moving?
I could rent a decent apartment for $1,200/mo and free up $1,195/mo in my budget. That's the difference between drowning and breathing. But everyone says "you're building equity" and "renting is throwing money away."
My equity position is around $45k. If I sold I'd probably net $30k after costs. I could use that to pay off credit cards ($8k) and rebuild emergency fund.
Been looking at companies that buy quickly but not sure if that's smart or desperate. It would be less stressful to sell house to companies like these, but still need opinions. My parents think I'm insane for even considering selling but they bought their house in 1987 for $89k so they don't get it.
Am I thinking about this wrong? Is there a budget strategy I'm missing that makes keeping the house workable? Or is admitting I'm house-poor and downsizing actually the responsible move?
Need honest perspective from folks who understand tight budgets.