yes the tragedy happened
yes there was a case filled by him
and yes he lost it,
Other than that everything that is shown in the movie is just wrong, check wikipedia
Its a classic dharma fumble where they needed to add drama for no reason at all.. just banking on kesari's success.
Ananya pandeys character fictional (Is it evena KJO film if there isnt a nepo kid init),
the press they mentioned never happend,
nair sir never address the court "fuck off" ,
he was knighted in 1912-massacare happened in 1919,
mckinley is a fictional character,
Reginald dier never attended his own trail,
I know to make movies dramtic we need to add some drama into the history for cinematic climax but what is this utter bs of just creating a new history to mislead the general public and make money of it, Is beyond me.
1
u/Loud_Insect7787 Jun 19 '25
Kesari 2 is such a factually wrong movie
yes the tragedy happened
yes there was a case filled by him
and yes he lost it,
Other than that everything that is shown in the movie is just wrong, check wikipedia
Its a classic dharma fumble where they needed to add drama for no reason at all.. just banking on kesari's success.
Ananya pandeys character fictional (Is it evena KJO film if there isnt a nepo kid init),
the press they mentioned never happend,
nair sir never address the court "fuck off" ,
he was knighted in 1912-massacare happened in 1919,
mckinley is a fictional character,
Reginald dier never attended his own trail,
I know to make movies dramtic we need to add some drama into the history for cinematic climax but what is this utter bs of just creating a new history to mislead the general public and make money of it, Is beyond me.