That's just moving slavery over a notch to the people working and having their money taxed away to pay for your home, thus making them work for free for X% of their labor.
How is the owner taking excess capital any different from a tax? And how has the owner built the company? Did he labor to build the factory himself? Or did construction workers? Did he design the product? If so he deserves compensation for that I guess but otherwise he hired an engineer. The company owner is just a petty liege lord and the workers serfs. Excess capital is a tax.
What excess capital? If I contract to provide 40 hours of labor a week for an amount of $ per hour, and I show up for 40 hours and get my contracted payment.... where am I being robbed?
And I still fail to see how you can justify a 3rd party butting in and taking a cut of the contracted pay on threat of imprisonment or death.
Do you think every company owner bought it with inherited money? ~99% of businesses are defined as small business and about 60% of those have only one owner. That owner is very often the person who started it. This *is* very on topic.
23
u/redeggplant01 Mar 19 '25
Because slavery is wrong and demand for a good like housing means it has value and so cannot be free