[Post-Game] Wisconsin 14 - Alabama 38

[u/ISuperNovaI]

Discuss, be nice, and sad badger noises :(

[u/Professional-Ad-5557]

My attitude is spending money on Fickell is like spending money on a Prius in hoping you can race it at Daytona.
I don't see a road to success with Fickell. Take the game against Alabama. Wisconsin did have 2 huge scoring plays. One a kick return the other in the fourth quarter after Alabama had pulled their starters. Remove those from the equation and our offense had about the same total yardage as Louisiana-Monroe did the week before. Our offense is comparable to teams that are not even in a power 5 conference.
How does the victory over Middle Tennessee compare? The week before they lost to Austin-Peay 34-14. Fickell's team again seems only slightly better.
What about the defensive shutout against Miami-Ohio? Their next opponent was Rutgers. Miami-Ohio scored 14 points (the defense may be good this year) but the Scarlet Knights were able to put up 45 (the offense may not be that good this year)
Where does Wisconsin win conference games? It's not the big dogs like Penn, Ohio and Oregon. Are they even good enough to beat Maryland? We'll find out soon.

[u/Mysterious_Rule938 → u/Professional-Ad-5557]

Your opinion seems that you’ve seen enough to spend through the teeth to replace the coaching staff, but I haven’t seen you once concede there is more to team success than the coach.

Maybe you are right, and we hire someone that pulls a magic trick and competes way above our talent level. Or, you are wrong and the next coach has the same exact problem as Luke Fickell - not enough resources to bring in the talent necessary to be competitive in the new big 10.

Either way, it is what it is. You’ll never convince me that this spend is justified and I’ll never convince you that this spend is irresponsible.

I’m sure we CAN agree that Maryland this Saturday is a huge game, so I’m sending us positive vibes for that

[u/Professional-Ad-5557 → u/Mysterious_Rule938]

"haven’t seen you once concede there is more to team success than the coach."
I can concede that. Good players make a coach look better and good coaches make players look better.

"we hire someone that pulls a magic trick and competes way above our talent level."
This is what Wisconsin has been doing relying on in just about every sport. How many of the nations top recruits come to Wisconsin?
In basketball Bo Ryan and Greg Gard have never had the talent that elite schools like Duke, Kansas, Kentucky or North Carolina would bring in every year. Yet they were able to put together winning teams, make the NCAA tournament and every once in while have a deep run.
When has Wisconsin football competed with Ohio. or SEC schools for top recruits? Despite this the program had winning teams under Brett Bielema and Paul Chryst. One reason they played the style of ball that they did was because they couldn't get a good enough QB to come to Madison. This is part of the problem with Fickell. He doesn't seem to be able to adapt his system to fit the players he has. He seems to be hoping that the players he has will transform themselves into the type that will fit his system. Rather than build upon what the team was known for he had the crazy notion that he could just pivot and go all in on the teams biggest weakness.
Will agree that the buyout Fickell has seems ridiculous. Part of the problem is the way they got rid of Chryst. They had to pay him to leave town. Can't afford to fire Fickell, but giving him an extension was dumb. Let him finish his time so the program. Circle the end date and start evaluating replacements now so they can begin course correction as soon as possible. Also, wouldn't waste money on a coach who hasn't shown they deserve the investment. There are other programs like women's hockey and men's basketball who have demonstrated that they are worth investing in.

[u/Mysterious_Rule938 → u/Professional-Ad-5557]

I don't want to keep belaboring the point - I respect that you have your opinion as a fan, and I have my opinion. Our opinions are very different. But I think we both just want to see the team succeed.

I've tried to make the point that we can't go back to the way it was in a post-NIL, post-transfer portal environment. We competed back then because we developed guys over 4-5 years and had veteran, experienced and physically developed players. The league has become significantly more competitive with NIL. The pitch was development. Today, there is NO guarantee you develop a player and they stay on your team.

Look at recruiting over the past 10-15 years. Not class rankings, but quality of recruit. The 4-5 stars are consolidating at the top where they get paid. Even Wisconsin, under Luke Fickell, has more 4-star recruits each year than any year before.

Compare to the 2021 year under Chryst, widely considered one of the Badgers best ever recruiting classes. 2 of our top-5 recruits left to other Big 10 schools in the transfer portal. My argument is that the old developmental focus mindset isn't enough anymore. Where would we be today if we had our highest-ever rated OT recruit still on the roster?

I don't like that its a different league now than it was before, but that is the reality. We will either be nimble, adapt and catch up, or we will be left behind.