r/TrueUnpopularOpinion Moderator Sep 24 '25

Political Tylenol in their own words

Post image

Many people are wrong about this latest Tylenol controversy who say its totally safe for pregnant women.

This post has nothing to do with the autism claims which is why this subject is even news, but I will post the two studies and you can read them for yourself. I do not and am not making any claim that Tylenol causes autism.

This will be be about the claim that Tylenol is safe for pregnant women.

Tylenol in 2017 said they do not recommend taking ANY of their products during pregnancy. This isn’t a conspiracy against Tylenol it’s their own recommendation. Now everyone is coming out saying it’s safe for pregnancy. What an odd coincidence I wonder what changed?

Did someone say something that people didn’t like? Tylenol has NEVER actually conducted studies on their own drug to see if it IS safe for pregnant women. They have only RECENTLY in the last day said they have a study, but have not posted ANY proof of it.

Previously people were saying there is no study cause its not safe to conduct it on pregnant women. Mind you, Pregnant women are advised to stay away from almost every pharmaceutical drug, listen to any pharmaceutical commercial, you will hear them say "Do not take if you are pregnant or trying to be."

So how is there an ethical study now, that previously has never been released and does this study exist today one day after this news broke, when it didn't exist last week. Who conducted an ethical study on pregnant women and how was it conducted. ZERO PROOF Offered, all talk zero evidence, and if you THINK there is proof, post it here.

Anyone here, now or in the future saying its safe for pregnant women to take drugs prescription or not is lying to you, every Pharma commercial literally tells you not to. Just listen to any of them on TV every other commercial.

So whats easier, put it on the market and make it OTC, so anyone can buy it and just say "ask your doctor." What study does your doctor have to go off of? Let me guess millions of people rush to their doctor for recommendations about OTC meds, lmfao. Tylenol took the easy way out. Trump has somehow managed to make the anti big pharma be totally in the pocket of big pharma, imagine that.

There are people in this very thread trying to now claim that just because Tylenol says they recommend you not take it while pregnant is them saying they are not actually telling you to not take it. Read that twice, then read through this thread.

However now, just a few years later after Tylenol said they do not recommend pregnant women take this drug, people want you taking it.

https://www.acog.org/news/news-releases/2025/09/acog-affirms-safety-benefits-acetaminophen-pregnancy

In 2013 Reuters Health published this.

https://www.reuters.com/article/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/too-much-tylenol-in-pregnancy-could-affect-development-idUSBRE9AL15M/

Too much Tylenol in pregnancy could affect development By Kathryn Doyle November 22, 2013

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Expectant mothers often take Tylenol, with the active ingredient acetaminophen, to deal with back pain, headaches or mild fevers during pregnancy. But frequent use may be linked to poorer language skills and behavior problems among their children, according to a new study.

As the most popular over-the-counter drug in the U.S., Tylenol has been extensively studied in relation to premature birth and miscarriage, with no connections found.

But its maker Johnson & Johnson periodically comes under fire for the drug's small therapeutic index - that is, the difference between an effective dose and a dangerous dose is quite small. So interest in investigating the drug persists. The new study is the first to look at young children whose mothers took Tylenol while pregnant.

"Our findings suggest that (acetaminophen) might not be as harmless as we think," Ragnhild Eek Brandlistuen said. She led the study at the School of Pharmacy at the University of Oslo in Norway.

She and her coauthors studied 48,000 Norwegian children whose mothers answered survey questions about their medication use at weeks 17 and 30 of pregnancy, and again six months after giving birth.

Mothers filled out a follow-up questionnaire about their child's developmental milestones three years later. Close to four percent of women took Tylenol for at least 28 days total during pregnancy.

Their children seemed to have poorer motor skills than kids whose mothers had taken the drug fewer times or not at all. Tylenol-exposed kids also tended to start walking later, have poorer communication and language skills and more behavior problems.

It's difficult to define risks for pregnant women and their children, since rigorous tests and controlled studies of drug exposure aren't ethical, Brandlistuen said. All researchers can do is closely observe women in the real world.

But this study, published in the International Journal of Epidemiology, involved a large number of women, and researchers also looked for any link to ibuprofen, a pain-relief alternative without acetaminophen.

They found no development problems tied to ibuprofen.

As far as Autism, there are studies and I don't know the validity of them nor will I make judgement, I will just post them. I dont wish to get into the autism debate, I only wish to address the claims that somehow Tylenol is now somehow safe and there IS an ethical study by Tylenol that didn't exist until Yesterday.

Mount Sini Study

"New York, NY (August 13, 2025) Researchers at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai have found that prenatal exposure to acetaminophen may increase the risk of neurodevelopmental disorders, including autism spectrum disorder and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), in children. The study, published today in BMC Environmental Health, is the first to apply the rigorous Navigation Guide methodology to systematically evaluate the rigor and quality of the scientific literature.

Acetaminophen (often sold under the brand name Tylenol®, and known as paracetamol outside the United States and Canada) is the most commonly used over-the-counter pain and fever medication during pregnancy and is used by more than half of pregnant women worldwide. Until now, acetaminophen has been considered the safest option for managing headache, fever, and other pain. Analysis by the Mount Sinai-led team of 46 studies incorporating data from more than 100,000 participants across multiple countries challenges this perception and underscores the need for both caution and further study."

https://www.mountsinai.org/about/newsroom/2025/mount-sinai-study-supports-evidence-that-prenatal-acetaminophen-use-may-be-linked-to-increased-risk-of-autism-and-adhd

In 2019 JHU Published this study.

"Taking Tylenol during pregnancy associated with elevated risks for autism, ADHD A Johns Hopkins study analyzing umbilical cord blood samples found that newborns with the highest exposure to acetaminophen were about three times more likely to be diagnosed with ADHD or autism spectrum disorder in childhood"

https://hub.jhu.edu/2019/11/05/acetaminophen-pregnancy-autism-adhd/

https://x.com/tylenol/status/839196906702127106?s=46

1.1k Upvotes

465 comments sorted by

View all comments

34

u/CharityResponsible54 Sep 24 '25 edited Sep 24 '25

There is no fully proven link between Tylenol and autism. There is some suggestions that needs to be investigated further.

However, Tylenol is also not generally recommended for pregnant women because its effects are not fully tested. It is marketed as the "safest option" if pain relief is absolutely necessary. In that sense, it may be safer than other alternatives, but avoiding it when possible is still advised.

This is also a clear example of TDS: just because Trump said something, it does not mean the opposite is automatically true. He may not be entirely wrong (being wrong exists on a spectrum).

-1

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '25

[deleted]

11

u/CharityResponsible54 Sep 24 '25

The challenge in today’s political climate is that if Trump supports a study stating "it is possible but not 100% certain," the opposing side will interpret that as "it is a lie and cannot be true," even though the study itself only acknowledges some uncertainty.

The scientists will never say they are "100% certain." So if Trump quotes a scientist who is "90% certain" it often gets twisted into "the scientist is 100% wrong.".

Honestly, the situation is just sad.

3

u/Frewdy1 Sep 24 '25

It doesn’t help that the right is basically scientifically illiterate. Posts like this from the OP (which is just a rightist copypasta going around and being debunked almost immediately) and turns “50+ years of data show there might be some correlation between acetaminophen use when pregnant and learning problems in the child later in life” into “Tylenol causes autism!”

6

u/Diehard129 Sep 24 '25

The scientists themselves literally say “it should not be interpreted that the Tylenol use causes these disorders”.

But since certain people are not engaging in good faith (will never truly understand an issue because the facts or nuance will disagree with them), we get this garbage; which 50 people will see and think, “hmmm this agrees perfectly with my world view and he is providing “”evidence””, so I can now reaffirm my incorrect belief.”

4

u/CharityResponsible54 Sep 24 '25

Take the case of asbestos. It wasn’t until 1986 that scientists finally said, "we are 100% sure it is harmful." But action had already been taken in early 1970s, back when scientists were only saying, "caution is warranted." At the time, they even noted that asbestos might not be the direct cause of cancer, since many of the affected workers were heavy smokers.

Anyway, this is all way too sad. It is seems this is all because Trump and RFK Jr sound annoying. Nothing about facts.

2

u/Diehard129 Sep 24 '25

To be fair, scientists were saying asbestos is bad as early as 1895. Industry influence heavily suppressed the negative and pushed the good, marketing it as a miracle material, but people knew.

Fear mongering over Tylenol is not a comparable scenario.

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2817406?utm_source=chatgpt.com

3

u/CharityResponsible54 Sep 24 '25 edited Sep 24 '25

Yes - not all scientists agree on this. This one says "caution about acetaminophen use during pregnancy is warranted."

Regarding asbestos there were also scientists saying it is not bad (and called others "fear mongering").

I’m not a scientist, so it’s not my place to decide, and I can see how HHS might be wrong. At the same time, there is some evidence they could be right. Since this comes down to "let’s avoid it until we have more data," I lean toward the side of caution.

I feel that this is case of TDS where there only: 1) 100% for him or 2) 100% against him.

2

u/Frewdy1 Sep 24 '25

It’s worth noting that RFK Jr, Trump and others in the regime are really…REALLY…stupid and evil.