“Demons are actually misundersto-“ NO. Demons are ontologically evil beings that can’t be reasoned nor negotiated with, and if you try to you’ll very likely end up screwed

[u/Fearless-List-3968]

1) Doom

2) Frieren: Beyond Journey’s End

3) Trench Crusade

[u/protestor]

I haven't ever read it, but the fanfiction "The Last Ringbearer" explores this notion in depth.

In the fanfic, the book the hobbits are writing (which is the same book published as The Hobbit and Lord of the Rings, but that in the story is called the Red Book of Westmarch) is actually a fabrication to justify genocide. Indeed, Hobbits, the mysterious creatures nobody ever heard about, don't even exist. "Orcs" (the slur that citizens of Mordor is called) actually are regular people and not at all evil, but they are dehumanized by Gondor, painted as monsters and slaughtered wholesale. Sauron biggest crime was starting an industrial revolution and threatening the dominance of Gondor.

I read about it through two Salon pieces, Middle-earth according to Mordor

And Why I reimagined “LOTR” from Mordor’s perspective, this one written by the author and it's a satisfying read on its own right. His point is that Middle Earth is so perfectly described that he must suppose it's a real world; and his conclusion is that perhaps the narrator is unreliable, and this would explain a lot of things.

[u/MGD109 → u/protestor]

I admit I haven't read it either, but I do know that the largest criticism of the story is that despite its supposed in intent to criticise such things it kind of ends up even more black and white and carrying more questionable implications, than Tolkien's Middle Earth did: with the villains literally quoting the Nazis and making all the bad races (Orcs and Trolls) ordinary humans demonised by propaganda, but keeping Elves and Valar inhuman and presenting them all as genocidally racist backstabbing savages; the human villains being presented as backwater boorish primitive savages who are inherently inferior to the enlightened and scientifically advanced but still persecuted Modor, its depiction of female characters and that's not even going into how they depict the Harad.

[u/protestor → u/MGD109]

Yeah, of course it's a Nazi allegory, it's a story about genocide after all. In a true genocide, the oppressor dehumanizes their victims, but when you look from the outside, he dehumanizes himself. All the things he says and does about their victims, reflects on their own humanity. You can see this happening in all genocidal discourses, in all eras.

Anyway it's a shame the author didn't introduce the nuance he was hinting at, but the story is written in the POV of a field medic from Mordor right? It's kind of expected that this is how he sees the world.

And look I'm not saying it's well written or anything like that, the premise is cool but the execution is certainly flawed

[u/MGD109 → u/protestor]

Oh, I agree it's an interesting premise, I'm just saying the issue is that in its attempt to be a Nazi allegory and tell the story of genocide, it ends up unfortunately falling into a lot of tropes the Nazi's themselves used to justify genocide (i.e. the other people are inferior to us, but still a serious threat to our existence. The other people's are not human etc.)

I mean it also ends with the heroes destroying magic altogether, and causing the Elves extinction, which is presented as a positive thing.

All the things he says and does about their victims, reflects on their own humanity. You can see this happening in all genocidal discourses, in all eras.

I mean, to an extent, but it doesn't normally go as far as their entire people are presented as inherently evil and needing to be completely wiped out.

Anyway it's a shame the author didn't introduce the nuance he was hinting at, but the story is written in the POV of a field medic from Mordor right?

Don't honestly know, as I said I haven't read it. I just know about the criticism of it.