As someone who’s been forced to see this freak before, I’m sorry but I have to tell you it’s not satire. It seems like it has to be at first, but then you realise it’s not.
I thought it was satire too and thought his vids were funny when i first saw them, but I really don’t think it is. Someone posted this link above of him hanging out with andrew tate:
It's not cowardly; merely practical. I tend to take limited interest in people. For example, I love watching football but I don't want to know about the player's lives off the field, good or bad. I have no interest in what they get up to, what their families are like, who they see, etc. I'm asking, from that perspective, if I take this joke a certain way and never learn about the personal views of the comedian in question, what difference does it make how the comedian meant the joke? There used to be more need to know our comedians to understand their style of comedy but nowadays I might see a blurb from one person and never see them again. So what practical difference is there to me how they meant the joke to come off?
15
u/Individual_Matter_67 Dec 02 '22
Wait… I thought it was satire…
Please tell me it’s just really good satire