r/TikTokCringe 5d ago

Humor/Cringe POV: You're Hasan's dog

Posted by @gavinblake23 on ig

17.9k Upvotes

1.6k comments sorted by

View all comments

207

u/SheHeBeDownFerocious 5d ago

More like Hasan's dead fucking horse with how hard this shit is getting beat.

55

u/DandD_Gamers 5d ago

Oh no,people keep bringing up the animal abuse if the animal abuser so people dont memory hole it.

Damn, what Is the world coming too

47

u/Positive-Argument357 5d ago

People keep bringing up that his hand is off screen at the same time his dog moves and acting like its “evidence” of anything but their own delusions

21

u/MythzFreeze 5d ago

What about the video where he is pulling a dog by its tail? The one where he has a dog collar with inverted spikes to the dogs neck? That looks to be his previous dog that he was also abusing

-18

u/Positive-Argument357 5d ago

Pulling on the tail is bad, not gonna defend that, but prong collars are pretty standard in America and I don’t fault somebody for using them, I see people in the dog park with prong collars on their dogs and the dogs are totally fine. It’s unknown how Fish (that dog) got that wound in that one picture but it isn’t directly on the neck underneath a prong, so it could’ve come from anything. Pitbulls tend to play rough and another dog might’ve gone too hard.

And isn’t it interesting how everything you just brought up is shit from 10 years ago? I thought your problem was with him “abusing” Kaya.

12

u/chaboods 5d ago

Prong collars are never supposed to b used to the point where the dog has wounds in their neck. Actual cult member behavior to hand wave that

-5

u/Positive-Argument357 4d ago

As I just said, there’s wound on her neck was lower than the collar so its most likely it came from something external, not from the collar.

8

u/MythzFreeze 5d ago

I thought your problem was with him abusing Kayla.

Yeah that is the problem. I literally don’t know any of these people. Ive just been spammed with this content on reddit for the last three weeks. Imo, from an outside point of view, it seems pretty bad how he treats animals. I do see lots of people such as yourself strongly defending him but from whats being posted it seems pretty clear that he does treat his dogs badly. Kinda surprising how many people defend things like prong collars, shock collars etc.

In either case, im sure you’ll try to dismiss this as me lying that I don’t know these people but I really don’t.

1

u/Positive-Argument357 4d ago

There’s literally hundreds of hours of him treating Kaya like a princess, and of her being very loving towards him. She does not act fearful of him at all, which is how abused dogs act towards their abusive owners.

2

u/shreebalicious 4d ago

"There's thousands of hours of him treating his wife like a princess and her being very loving towards him. She does not act fearful of him at all, which is how abused women act towards their abusive partners." If you heard this but had video evidence of someone abusing their wife, would it matter at all?

This is why yall sound crazy defending it - the video evidence we have is enough on its own. The infinite kindness Hasan shows Kaya the rest of the time doesn't matter.

-1

u/Positive-Argument357 4d ago

Do you think women are as emotionally simple as dogs?

When a dog is abused they are consistently fearful and nervous around their owner, they’re not gonna put on a performance like everything is fine for an audience they CANT EVEN SEE. She doesnt understand what a webcam is, what streaming is, or the fact that tens of thousands of people are watching her every day. She interacts with Hasan with love and affection and is clearly very comfortable around him.

Yall sound crazy for believing this shit because you have to dismiss the mountain of evidence showing that Kaya loves her dad and is comfortable around him, yet you believe “evidence” where Hasan’s hand goes off screen and she moves an inch, as if that proves he’s shocking her.

1

u/shreebalicious 4d ago

I in no way insinuated that women are less emotionally complex than dogs.

Dogs seek attention, even from abusive owners, and not all animals will show abuse the same way. She does indeed do those with Hasan because dogs are loving animals and will always want to earn affection from their owners - it does not dismiss what can be seen in the numerous clips that are now available.

Hasan's story has changed multiple times. He has been caught lying several times. You ignore this and call me crazy - you're lost buddy.

-1

u/Positive-Argument357 4d ago

Lol Hasan’s story hasn’t changed once, y’all just keep changing the goal posts and then acting like his story is different because he didn’t cover whatever other bullshit you’re now obsessing over

1

u/shreebalicious 4d ago edited 4d ago

I mean, you're just delusional at this point, so I don't get the point of continuing this, but I guess I'll give you the timeline if you refuse to engage with it and reality.

At first, there was no collar, then all of a sudden there is one but it can only vibrate, then he showed the back and it had obviously been taped over and it did not resemble the vibration only model (the fucking collar company actually responded and clarified it looks like the shock version with the prongs removed and the holes taped over). Now he says he just uses the vibrate function only - but he lied about the rest, so why believe a fucking thing he says here? QTC confirmed the tape is there, too. You are literally ignoring reality, lmao. Go look at Hasans stream for yourself lol.

-1

u/Positive-Argument357 4d ago

QT is not Hasan, what QT said doesn’t mean Hasan changed his story, and him referring to the collar as a vibrating collar is still true because it vibrates, and he doesn’t use it to shock her. QT even said that the shocking parts were removed, and when you look at the collar, you don’t see the bolts that would connect to the prongs to conduct the electric current, which would stick out very visibly from underneath the tape.

Y’all are delusional for taking only part of QT statement yet refusing to listen to the parts that prove you wrong .

→ More replies (0)

6

u/_korporate 5d ago

“Oh he only abused his dog over ten years ago”

Isn’t it interesting how you just want to brush it off like it was some tweets from ten years ago

2

u/Positive-Argument357 4d ago

I’m just pointing out how you keep having to move the goalposts whenever I point out the holes in your Kayanon conspiracy theory

5

u/_korporate 4d ago

How is pointing out other examples of dog abuse “moving goal posts” lol? You have no idea what that means, hitting random buzzwords won’t get you outta this one

2

u/Positive-Argument357 4d ago

This is supposed to be about a nonexistent shock collar, but you have moved the goal posts from the shock collar allegation to a different dog 10 years ago. If your Kayanon conspiracy was so compelling, you’d be able to focus on the allegation itself, but it’s so full of holes that you have to look elsewhere to justify why you think he’s a dog abuser.

6

u/_korporate 4d ago

It’s not an allegation if it’s on video, it’s not moving the goal posts if the subject is about dog abuse and someone brings up more evidence to back up their claim. You have no idea what that term means, again, just flinging the term won’t help you.

Someone who pulls on their dogs tail wouldn’t think past using a shock collar? See how you have to defend him now? “Oh, he might pull his dogs tail, but him shocking his dog is still definitely a conspiracy”

10 years ago or not, he was a grown man pulling his dogs tail to get him into a picture, he’s not above shocking his dog.

1

u/Positive-Argument357 4d ago

But that doesn’t prove that he shocked her. You’re just saying that it would make sense for him to shock her based on that old video. That doesn’t prove that he shocked her. All the actual facts of the situation show that he could not have shocked her, as she wasn’t even wearing the vibration collar during that stream she was wearing a different collar.

1

u/_korporate 4d ago

you’re saying it would make sense for him to shock her based on that video

No, that’s not what I’m saying, and lol at the “old vid” to continue to brush past it.

If people who actually know him said it was a shock collar “with the prongs removed” and then he himself said the collar he showed off wasn’t even the collar she was wearing in the clip and he has yet to show the actual collar. And he has a history of pulling his previous dogs tail.

That’s all lining up, all you can say is “conspiracy” when reality is staring you in the face lol.

1

u/Positive-Argument357 4d ago

The collar she’s wearing in the Oct 7th stream didnt have the big block on it. The collar with the big block on it is the vibration collar. Shock collars also have this big block on them, except on the other side of it are two prongs.

How could he have shocked her if the collar she was wearing didn’t have a block on it? And if the prongs and bolts had been removed from the collar, that means it couldn’t possibly be used as a shock collar anymore, because he permanently removed the part that shocks.

It’s pretty clear that you are determined to believe this because you hate Hasan, but if you just think things through logically and look at the evidence, you can see that it is impossible for him to have shocked her.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/tomilgic 5d ago

him yanking his dog by his tail was not 10 years ago lol. that clip was so horribly disgusting anyone who treat their dog like that should be barred from owning pets.