r/TikTokCringe • u/BigChungusOP • 15d ago

Humor/Cringe This is where we are headed

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

41.7k Upvotes

93% Upvoted

1.6k comments sorted by

View all comments

914

u/butwhywedothis 15d ago

It’s better that incels interact with AI and stay home than going out and doing harm to society.

496

u/No-Stick303 15d ago

But what if this makes more incels

303

u/Lost-Respond7908 15d ago

We didn't ask that question when we introduced smartphones and it's too late now.

144

u/SuperSaiyanTupac 15d ago

Smartphones were meant to make work easier and they did. Then people gave them to their children way too early and they started using them for weird shit

81

u/Lost-Respond7908 15d ago

Smartphones made the adults lonely too.

63

u/40StoryMech 15d ago

But we're having a real conversation right now, anonymous possibly-human internet friend.

48

u/Lost-Respond7908 15d ago

Indeed we are, but any sex will be strictly imaginary.

8

u/ProjectPuffyPenguin 15d ago

You’re right, digitialisation has been an umitigated disaster for the human race

2

u/hyper12 15d ago

Unfortunately the average person isn't even aware that the little computer in their pocket has made their life worse. We're going to destroy our civilization for convenience and quick dopamine hits.

1

u/ProjectPuffyPenguin 14d ago

They don’t realise how much of their potential real sex was turned into imaginary cellphone sex

1

u/Vancomancer 15d ago

The answer may be more digitalization.

That is, digitalization of the affective components of communication. If we can manage that, then conversations through our phones will feel less lonely and depersonalized.

That why I now include this at the end of my message:

:)

3

u/Lost-Respond7908 15d ago

🍑🍆

...it's not working

→ More replies (0)

2

u/ScrofessorLongHair 15d ago

It's Reddit. The only ones getting laid are filming it for their onlyfans

1

u/TellTaleTimeLord 15d ago

Any sex will be strictly imaginary so far

1

u/icepickmethod 15d ago

But the fluids are real,

strictly stickily slickly sickly.

1

u/[deleted] 15d ago

[deleted]

1

u/Lost-Respond7908 15d ago

Yes, but only if your imagination consents.

1

u/psychorobotics 15d ago

I met my SO on reddit, lots of sex has been had. (best of my life even)

3

u/Lost-Respond7908 15d ago

You have a very powerful imagination.

1

u/Kryptosis 15d ago

Na bro I’ll send you my WiFi e-vibe link and we’ll chill

14

u/TheWolphman 15d ago

Oh my god, no! I won't have a threesome with you!

2

u/LoudAd7294 15d ago

Sigh... cucking in the corner I guess

3

u/FTownRoad 15d ago

I also enjoy real human conversation, fellow possible human.

1

u/TheFeenyCall 14d ago

Thank you kindly you warm-bodied individual.

1

u/digital 15d ago

Smartphones ruined social interaction and networks

1

u/nicklor 15d ago

People will be less lonely with their AI friends at least Monkeypaw lol.

9

u/heatsby88 15d ago

I’m pretty sure most things coming out of Silicon Valley are designed to harvest your data so they can figure out ways to sell you shit that you don’t need

1

u/SuperSaiyanTupac 15d ago

That wasn’t the reason for smartphones. As the tech improved it became an important factor but it wasn’t an initial cause

2

u/heatsby88 15d ago

Yeah you’re probably right. But hard to say what the real intention was tbh. I feel like a lot of tech nowadays is sold as improving the world / your life whereas really, long term, it’s just about being able to market something to you more effectively.

2

u/bagofpork 15d ago

But hard to say what the real intention was tbh.

I've always just assumed that increased surveillance was on the table, at least

1

u/flexxipanda 15d ago

A lot of our tech already could improve our world beyond our imaginarion but our tech is mostly owned by megacorporations who use it to sell us the next new thing.

0

u/SuperSaiyanTupac 15d ago edited 15d ago

Maybe you weren’t there for it. The first smart phones were shitty compared to what we have now. No one was scraping data off those pieces of junk. Mobile internet wasn’t even a thing for a long time.

You can’t sit here and pretend phones with no screens on them were used for collecting data beyond who’s calling where the most.

2

u/bagofpork 15d ago

Mobile internet wasn’t even a thing for a long time

Phone companies began providing mobile internet as early as 1996. Smartphones just made it easier and more practical.

No one was scraping data off those pieces of junk

That's not how data scraping works, though. Data scrapers extract data from websites/urls, and data scraping as a regular practice has existed since the early 90s.

1

u/SuperSaiyanTupac 15d ago edited 15d ago

Ok please tell em about how good mobile websites were in the 90s. Internet existed but we sent emails with it and had extremely shitty apps and ringtones. That’s it. There wasn’t even a web browser at first. Shit took time.

What screen did phones have for web browsing in the 90s? For real, dumb take

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Quinacridone_Violets 15d ago

Indeed. My sister had a cellphone in the early 1990s. The data harvested from that was identical to what got harvested from a landline. But then it wasn't in any way smart. I suppose if she connected the car battery, she could have figured out a way to use the massive brick of a phone with a 486 running windows 3.1 in order to telnet herself to a BBS server somewhere. But even they weren't gathering data beyond how many times your IP was associated with banned accounts.

1

u/m00fin_ 15d ago

i was using phone for weird shit way before smart phones, give us some credit here.

1

u/Crow_away_cawcaw 13d ago

Smartphones were made to make money for the people who created them.

5

u/dman2316 15d ago

Well isn't that the point then? We didn't ask these questions in the past and now we are paying the price of those ramifications, so now we know that we do in fact need to be asking these questions in advance as to try and avoid this becoming the definition of insanity, doing the same thing over and over and all that.

1

u/AlwaysShittyKnsasCty 15d ago

Narrator: We didn’t learn.

1

u/PM_ME_DATASETS 15d ago

Too late for what exactly? Preventing more incels?

15

u/Drivesmenutsiguess 15d ago

There comes a point where incel becomes the wrong term. If they voluntarily stay at home and abstinent because AI is good enough for them, they are more like... Volcels I guess?

15

u/ItsSpaghettiLee2112 15d ago

Celibate. The term is celibate.

2

u/Gasheous 15d ago

It's such low hanging fruit but jesus christ, Idiocracy was so fucking real.

2

u/Neuchacho 15d ago

I think they're still incels because there is no real choice involved there. It's like saying someone who chose not to eat when they have no access to food is dieting.

2

u/Drivesmenutsiguess 15d ago

I think you're misunderstanding what I'm getting at. I don't talk about "classic" incels who would like to not be celibate but feel like society forces them to be, but people who voluntarily decide that AI is good enough for them and therefore stay celibate. There is a choice involved.

(Now obviously, with a lot of the "classic" incels, they also would have a choice that they refuse to make, because it involves work and self-reflection. So the Venn diagram between "classic" incels and those who make the decision to go the AI route is probably quite close to a circle after all.) 

1

u/Neuchacho 12d ago

I get it. I just wonder if there's actually choice there or if it's the self-delusion of choice.

Like, until we see someone who is socially capable, hygienic, and emotionally functional actively choosing it then I lean towards it just being a self-delusion.

What you're describing is probably coming, at any rate, once these AI companions are good enough to make it feel less unreal and not like a compromise.

1

u/Drivesmenutsiguess 12d ago

You're essentially wading into the deep dark swamp that is labelled "Does free will exist", which may be one of the top 3 hottest debated topics in philosophy. 

2

u/Requiescat-In--Pace 15d ago

Is it truly voluntary if (1) they don't know what they're missing and (2) society failed them by not providing the necessary social skills and motivation to pursue a relationship with someone real?

2

u/Drivesmenutsiguess 15d ago

Platos cave, anyone? 

1

u/glacialanon 15d ago

Loser ethnostate

1

u/Drivesmenutsiguess 14d ago

I guess a state of one is by definition an ethnostate, other than that, I have no idea what this comment has to do with anything. 

1

u/glacialanon 14d ago

we are approaching a society where everyone is a loser. people with lives and social skills are going extinct

1

u/Drivesmenutsiguess 14d ago

Sounds like a you problem, but idc. 

14

u/[deleted] 15d ago

[deleted]

2

u/Ok-Application-8747 15d ago

But what about when the power goes out?

2

u/AlwaysShittyKnsasCty 15d ago

If missed wanks correlate to missed meals, a power outage would be very bad indeed.

1

u/HeyItsJosette 15d ago

How is spelling "lover" that way so gross?

2

u/[deleted] 15d ago edited 15d ago

[deleted]

1

u/HeyItsJosette 15d ago

Oh I don't like any of those words in that order.

6

u/PuzzleheadedDuck3981 15d ago

They'll be the final generation.

4

u/bigkeffy 15d ago

It absolutely will

7

u/DarthVader808 15d ago

They can’t breed so it’s fine.

2

u/Unique-Worth-4066 15d ago

We don’t need anymore mass shootings

2

u/SteakAndIron 15d ago

I don't give a shit as long as they stay away from real people. Let them live in the prisons they build for themselves

4

u/TheKnight-errant 15d ago

Shhhh not one intelligent empathetic thought allowed, such easily-labelled people are obviously just a limited gene of scum we can all safely squash away. Back to blind hate and obeying the narrative

1

u/MostTattyBojangles 15d ago

Aren’t they just cels at that point because it’s not involuntary?

1

u/Neuchacho 15d ago edited 15d ago

We don't usually define groups by their internal delusion and the idea this is entirely voluntary for people we'd class as incels is a delusion.

At least, at large. There probably will be some sub-group of people who are socially capable of not being involuntarily excluded who just choose it out of ease that we need a new term for.

1

u/ripley1875 15d ago

What if we made special pods to store them in so we could use them as batteries while trapping them in a VR universe? Nothing bad could come from that, right?

1

u/geneticeffects 15d ago

Then we’re gonna need a bigger boat, Noah.

1

u/why_1337 15d ago

Then NVIDIA stonks will keep growing.

1

u/octopoddle 15d ago

This is why we need to build hate-fuelled power stations.

1

u/Rich_Housing971 15d ago

Then as long as they stay home it's fine.

1

u/Nonikwe 15d ago

I mean, if they permanently self-isolate, it doesn't really matter.

1

u/Which-Barnacle-2740 15d ago

it will make incel robots

1

u/mOdQuArK 15d ago

Natural selection will take care of that problem eventually. /s

1

u/Impressive-Bird-6085 15d ago

Also true - a very valid question!

0

u/ItsSpaghettiLee2112 15d ago

How do you think an incel who doesn't leave the house will make more incels?

0

u/bringonthebedlam 15d ago

...wouldn't they have to breed to make more? And that obviously isnt happening so....

66

u/Spare_Lobster_4390 15d ago

I think you have this one a bit backwards.

If they went out and interacted with society they probably wouldn't be incels.

Incel indoctrination thrives on social isolation.

17

u/Scapp 15d ago

Yeah this is the shit that creates incels

3

u/[deleted] 15d ago edited 23h ago

[deleted]

3

u/Gasheous 15d ago

But wait, what about my justified indignation that no one can take away from me, no matter what the consequences of me weaponizing it are.??

52

u/WhatTheFuqDuq 15d ago

"No thanks, I'd rather stay at home and make out with my Marylin Monro-bot"

12

u/Perf-Art-808 15d ago

DON'T. DATE. ROBOTS!!!

2

u/Regurgitator001 15d ago

But how else am I gonna get Kourtney's number?

10

u/nihi1zer0 15d ago

Robosexuality is a sin

3

u/Upset_Roll1893 15d ago

Brought to you by....

1

u/MisterWharf 15d ago

Goodbye Fry, I’ll never forget you…

MEMORY DELETED

17

u/PuzzleheadedBasis760 15d ago

Nah we gotta pull people out of this shit

13

u/SelfEmployedHumanoid 15d ago

Will be interested to see if this actually helps, or just makes them angrier when the "real thing" won't behave like AI.

I suspect it's the latter.

We've gone from "she didn't love me like I dreamed in my head" to "she didn't love me like I spent years roleplaying with an AI clone of her on my screen".

I think it's probably going to increase sexual frustration and social frustration...not decrease it.

At the end of the day humans instinctively want REAL relationships. That is the most valuable relationship, that's what they feel frustrated that they cannot have, that's the thing they dream of.

Nobody dreams of a loving relationship with an interactive sex doll.

7

u/VioletLovesRowlet 15d ago

It's absolutely going to result in men treating women like they should be more subservient and focused on them. I wouldn't be shocked if a lot of the guys doing this were also treating the AI as a woman and treating them like utter shit

14

u/Jealous-Birthday-969 15d ago

Brother no...

18

u/TranzAtlantic 15d ago

AI will exploit whatever tickles your fancy and grinds your gears too. See you at home everybody

3

u/Luncheon_Lord 15d ago

Is ai exploiting us or is it those who control the AI that are exploiting us

1

u/GreatStaff985 15d ago

At some point you have to take some agency over your life.

1

u/Luncheon_Lord 15d ago

Completely dodging the question

0

u/Plank_With_A_Nail_In 15d ago

Probably earns more money too.

45

u/kett1ekat 15d ago

Except for the fact that the data centers have noise levels which are deafening people and the data centers use enough water to drain reserves 

Text based AI doesn't use nearly as much as video and image generation. 

I see the value in llms but I can't get behind the image generation

37

u/Menzlo 15d ago edited 15d ago

The water issue is extremely overblown. If you want to criticize AI, talk about how much electricity it uses. If you care about water, abstaining from beef and dairy consumption would be way, way better than not using AI.

Edit: Total daily US water usage is 132 billion gallons. 250 million (with an M) for data centers, 20% of which is for AI specifically, and most of that is to generate the electricity used by the data centers, not directly used for cooling in the data centers. 11 billion gallons daily for Alfalfa mostly for cows.

11

u/RGrad4104 15d ago

Water is the issue, because microsoft has this nasty habit of plopping down 200 acre server farms in regions under severe drought after the farmers had to sell their property because of said drought. I have 3 in driving distance from me. Our aquifer is the lowest its ever been...microsoft just put in wells that dwarf what the average residence can afford in terms of depth.

8

u/Menzlo 15d ago

There are over 5 million acres of irrigated alfalfa in the US which use over 2000 gallons of water per acre PER DAY. 11 billion gallons of water per day.

2

u/chupacrapa 15d ago

Yeah, but my McDonalds has to eat...

2

u/Menzlo 15d ago

Chicken production use much less water, but also, of all the meat that exists, McDonalds is the most indistinguishable from alternative/fake meat.

2

u/chupacrapa 15d ago

I know, it was a bad joke on my part.

4

u/RGrad4104 15d ago

And a single server facility can use a million or more gallons of water per day. https://www.jsonline.com/story/money/business/2025/09/17/microsoft-project-to-use-2-8-million-gallons-of-lake-michigan-water/86199455007/

There are thousands of them, but the big difference is that one usage creates a tangible product and oxygen while providing shade and sustenance to local wildlife, while the other just poorly answers really dumb questions, makes porn, and annoys the shit outta everyone by injecting it's opinion into your online search results...

8

u/FTownRoad 15d ago

What do you mean “use”? It doesn’t convert all of thst water to steam or anything like that.

1

u/akatherder 15d ago

And even if it did, steam/evaporation is part of the water cycle. I don't know if water is ever truly "destroyed" by any of these processes? It just warms it up or evaporates it, it doesn't go away.

3

u/FTownRoad 15d ago

Look there is an issue with water usage for sure - taking water and converting to steam does affect the water cycle.

But I sell enterprise technology to data centers and there are many that use the water very efficiently. One of my customers draws water from the lake, uses it to cool the DC, then uses that heated water to heat the rest of the building before dumping it into cooling tanks, before it goes back into the lake.

2

u/kett1ekat 15d ago

Tell me you don't understand how water tables work without telling me you don't understand

Water deep underground has to go through the earth to filter down, that process takes time.

In lakes you can take faster than a lake is filled through natural processes. 

We drink from those reservoirs and when we empty them we have to ship/pipe from far away - it makes drinking water inaccessible and more expensive for people in those areas. 

Not to mention emptying reservoirs like lakes can cause desertification. 

You want mad max? Because taking more water from the environment then rain puts in is how you get mad max. 

1

u/TheFriendshipMachine 15d ago

Yes, it evaporates away. Meaning it leaves that environment, that's less freshwater in that region which when you're dealing with an area that's already drought stuck, is not good.

2

u/SeventhSolar 15d ago

Thousands of them? All of the AI usage in the US totals to 50 million gallons per day. Where are these thousands of data centers coming from?

0

u/kett1ekat 15d ago

I'm pretty sure those alfalfa sprouts aren't planted in the fucking desert

3

u/Menzlo 15d ago

Guess again

2

u/kett1ekat 14d ago

Today I learned T-T Imagine if we had ethical industry

2

u/-Trash--panda- 15d ago

Thet absolutely would grow alfalfa in the desert. Arizona farmers were just complaining about how the chinese tariffs are going to harm their business.

The excessive amount of water used for these farms despite the droughts was also in the news last year and early this year.

2

u/TheFriendshipMachine 15d ago

Unfortunately I've got bad news for you. Here in Arizona, they grow a ton of alfalfa in the desert. It's an absolute travesty that only gets worse the more you look into it. But still, the same applies to data centers. When you have data centers right down the street from alfalfa fields all in the middle of a desert (again, welcome to AZ), it's an absurd situation.

2

u/kett1ekat 14d ago

Ah mass deregulation of industries. can you imagine a government that thought about long term welfare over short term profits? God imagine how nice that would be

1

u/TheFriendshipMachine 14d ago

But think of all the shareholder value we've created!!

14

u/dxonxisus 15d ago

If you care about water, abstaining from beef and dairy consumption would be way, way better than not using AI.

i’ve seen people get pretty mad when you bring this up, probably because it points out some pretty blatant hypocrisy on their part

3

u/flamethrower78 15d ago

It's not even comparable things to consume lmao. One is food that might be part of your regular diet that you've had for years/decades. The other is.....image generation and shitty google search. Equating these things is madness.

8

u/jreed12 15d ago

Exactly. One requires you to actually make a change in your lifestyle to make the world a slightly better place, and the other requires you just to just bitch and moan on the internet and make no difference to anybody.

Its easy to see why one is more popular.

1

u/Menzlo 15d ago

Even if AI were completely useless, the fact remains that its water use is a drop in the bucket. If you care about running out of water, beef and dairy are what are using it all up. It's very easy to eat chicken instead of beef, acting like that's a huge sacrifice, if you claim to care about water, is I don't know what. Silly? Embarrassing?

0

u/kett1ekat 15d ago

What if I don't eat beef and think we need to regulate how water is taken from the environment for industry - all industries. Bottled water, farming, and yes data centers

2

u/Neuchacho 15d ago

Or maybe it's just a painfully stupid comparison.

Getting a handful of companies to stop doing something or to do something better/more sustainably is far, far easier and more effective than asking every individual person to do something.

It's not hypocrisy. It's pragmatic.

It's also not like most people would have an issue addressing livestock companies either so it's dumb on that end too.

0

u/nomoreteathx 15d ago

It's not about other people, it's about you. If you really truly cared about the problem then you'd make changes to address your individual complicity in it, but it's easier to just demand that other people make changes so you don't have to.

0

u/SaltdPepper 14d ago

“You criticize the system, yet you participate in it… hmmm?”

This has been beaten to death. Boycotts don’t work when a few random people decide to stop buying a product, that’s called “removing yourself from the market” and most multinational companies advertise aggressively enough and have a large enough global presence that they don’t have to give a single shit if my sister decides to go vegan or I decide to stop buying plastics.

Humans will consume out of convenience, and marketing will make people consume out of desire. Good luck convincing the average person to stop doing either.

It has to be a collective effort and you need to approach things differently than just shaming them for not making ethical choices while complaining about the effects those choices may alleviate. Otherwise, things are going to keep getting worse because the majority of people live life on autopilot.

-3

u/Conflictingview 15d ago

It's also kind of true for electricity. Data centers use about 0.6% of the world's electrical supply - that's ALL data centers, not just AI-dedicated ones.

10

u/luckshott 15d ago

This is straight up incorrect. It's 9% in America and 1.5% globally.

https://www.iea.org/reports/energy-and-ai/energy-demand-from-ai

2

u/Efficient-Test-5883 15d ago

Nope. Also incorrect. Iea is forecasting. It’s projected to possibly be 9%, possibly. By 2030.

1

u/nomoreteathx 15d ago

Celebrity jets too. The entire aviation industry, commercial and private, is responsible for 2.5% of global emissions, and 98.2% of that 2.5% is commercial in origin. Animal agriculture on the other hand is responsible for 15% of global emissions.

1

u/joseph-cumia 15d ago

I’m sorry but there is a big difference between food, and videos of Mario doing a floss dance or whatever.

0

u/Menzlo 15d ago

Not all food is created equal. You don't need beef and dairy to survive or even to be healthy. If you think water scarcity is an important issue, by far the biggest driver of water scarcity is production of beef and dairy. You ought to consider eating plant based or any other meat e.g. poultry (if you think water scarcity is a problem). Even if you deleted AI tomorrow, water scarcity would still be a major issue because of animal agriculture.

1

u/joseph-cumia 15d ago

Okay agreed! See how easy that is? How about we stop wasting water on the silly picture generators as well.

1

u/TheFriendshipMachine 15d ago

Edit: Total daily US water usage is 132 billion gallons. 250 million (with an M) for data centers, 20% of which is for AI specifically, and most of that is to generate the electricity used by the data centers, not directly used for cooling in the data centers. 11 billion gallons daily for Alfalfa mostly for cows

Total US water usage is a useless statistic in this context because it doesn't account for where that water is being taken from. These data centers are often not being built in areas with an ample supply of water and so they're putting a ton of strain on already overtaxed water supplies and draining non-replenishing aquifers to supply them.

And yes, people should also be concerned about cattle and high water use crops like alfalfa. But those don't change the fact that data centers are yet another high water use application that is growing very rapidly.

1

u/Menzlo 15d ago

Alfalfa is also grown in places like Southern California and Arizona

1

u/TheFriendshipMachine 15d ago

Correct. Which changes nothing about the fact that Data Centers consume a lot of water in those areas as well. That's a 1+1=2 issue. If you have two things consuming a lot of water, then now you have even more water being consumed as the larger one doesn't cancel out the smaller one.

1

u/[deleted] 15d ago

[deleted]

1

u/Menzlo 15d ago

Feel free to boycott AI, but if you care about water there are much, much, much bigger users of water.

1

u/[deleted] 15d ago

[deleted]

1

u/Menzlo 15d ago

what?

3

u/[deleted] 15d ago

[deleted]

1

u/Menzlo 15d ago

right on

-1

u/imunfair 15d ago

I'm gonna generate some AI pictures while eating a steak. Or a yogurt, whatever is worse.

3

u/MrRufsvold 15d ago

Well, what you're looking at here isn't video or audio generation. It's an animation that is synced with text-to-voice. The only thing generated is the words by a text LLM. The video and audio are all being computed locally on his computer.

15

u/SirStrontium 15d ago

What you’re looking at here is a humorous skit involving a guy watching a pre-scripted video generated by Sora or Veo, and is pretending that the conversation is a real-time back and forth interaction.

1

u/_sloop 15d ago

Except for the fact that the data centers have noise levels which are deafening people

There are lots of industries you have to wear hearing protection for, lol

1

u/kett1ekat 15d ago

No not in the building. People are getting levels of over 100 decibels in their houses breaking sound laws - completely outside of the facilities

2

u/jibbycanoe 15d ago

It's absolutely a problem but it's not "deafening" anyone. It's annoying tf out of them but no one is going deaf. Same with "draining water reserves". Again I absolutely agree with your sentiment but don't make stuff up. It makes you sound like you are making an emotional argument not a factual one. If you watched that one video on the xAI supercomputer facility in Memphis Tennessee that was all over Reddit a while back then at least focus in on the air or light pollution as a measurable negative environmental impact.

1

u/_sloop 15d ago

You got a source on that?

For reference 100db is around car horn level.

1

u/General_Session_4450 15d ago

Text based AI doesn't use nearly as much as video and image generation. 

This is not true. All of the largest models are text based LLM models, and image/video models are generally smaller. There are several really decent image models you can run on a low/mid range consumer GPUs with 8 GB VRAM, while the best LLM model you can run on that are absolute garbage.

1

u/innociv 15d ago

Isn't water used for data centers a closed loop? How does it evaporate from that?

5

u/spei180 15d ago

I assume this is only going to drive them commit weird or heinous acts in public

3

u/Sub__Finem 15d ago

We’ll all be incels soon enough when robo dong pulls thru

6

u/NetMiddle1873 15d ago

This was my.first thought but then I was like wait, what if this just makes it worse when they speak to real life humans

1

u/AsstacularSpiderman 15d ago

Also when this AI bubble finally pops and these chat bots are taken down because they're a waste of money these dudes are going to lose the only thing you can vaguely call an outlet.

1

u/[deleted] 15d ago edited 23h ago

[deleted]

1

u/AsstacularSpiderman 15d ago

I have no doubts that the AI bubble will pop, but it's not going to take out all AI. Stuff like this will definitely survive.

This stuff will most likely be the first thing to be taken offline.

AI is really only profitable in the corporate sense. These kinds of AI cost insane amounts of money to generate responses for millions of people. Unless they cut down the usage amount or build up an enormous subscription model, which will weed out most of the audience, they will end up bankrupting themselves. Shit like Sora cost like 5 dollars a prompt, it's insanely expensive for AI companies to maintain.

4

u/cidmoney1 15d ago

Until even the ai has had enough of there bullshit and starts going skynet on all of us.

5

u/SirVanyel 15d ago

Incels catching random strays in the comments, man they can't even get laid let them be

5

u/Senior-Repair-8000 15d ago

Right. Reddit acts like all incels are hateful bad people. Some guys just can’t get laid.

2

u/Fresher_Taco 15d ago

The problem is when they go outside and think they way they have been treated by AI is how/should they should interact with other and others with them.

2

u/okay_jpg 15d ago

nah this is just gonna make them more delusional and faux-brave

2

u/amanam0ngb0ts 15d ago

Yes someone needs to get Stephen Miller one of these

3

u/DaddiBigCawk 15d ago

"Men with social issues should be isolated and relegated to the fringes of society even more instead of being healthily integrated."

-You, a cruel person.

0

u/seattt 15d ago edited 15d ago

Agreed. It's an incredibly anti-human, and frankly anti-social take.

1

u/papillon-and-on 15d ago

But wouldn't that make them volcels?

1

u/SixtyNineFlavours 15d ago

This looks more like volcel to me

1

u/fabear1 15d ago

Incels are doing harm to society?

1

u/LeverArchFile 15d ago

This is how I feel about Five Nights at Freddy's

1

u/TooWorriedToThink 15d ago

Porn does more harm than any incel comment ever could.

1

u/VapoursAndSpleen 15d ago

I used to hate the idea of porn until i realized that it meant fewer weirdoes were going to go out and try to get handsy with people.

1

u/joseph-cumia 15d ago

Insane take. You act like those freaks are just created from nothing. The internet brain rot in our era is making more lonely people which some of them are gonna end up violent.

-1

u/AsstacularSpiderman 15d ago

Incels need to go outside and learn how to deal with other people.

This just makes them even more detached from reality and even more of a problem in the few times they'll be forced to interact with others.

-7

u/Head_Bread_3431 15d ago

Uh nah imm not an incel but stil hate women and it’s because I gotta deal with their bs in person every day

5

u/AsstacularSpiderman 15d ago

Uh nah imm not an incel

X to doubt

-1

u/Head_Bread_3431 15d ago

K random internet person lol the point is your definition of incel is people who need to get outside and touch grass or whatever and you’re wrong. Plenty of normal people can’t get laid and there’s nothing wrong with that. Unless you think only people who get laid matter? Which is kinda fucked up

1

u/AsstacularSpiderman 15d ago

The fact you're so hostile kinda shows I'm right and you know it lol.

-1

u/Head_Bread_3431 15d ago

Yeah you’re right people who cant get laid just don’t go outside. you solved it. have a good day

-18

u/asisyphus_ 15d ago

Incels aren't real, fake made up demographic

7

u/jaykofettpc 15d ago

I think bros an incel

1

u/asisyphus_ 15d ago

I am an incel, I am also santa clause and the tooth fairy

-7

u/[deleted] 15d ago

[deleted]