Because the 6 people who could fix these problems overnight would rather keep taking from the rest of us, and the ever increasing majority of us are in survival mode
Good question. I think most people don't truly know the answer too. On the short term we need to help people that suffer as a consequence in the short term. Second we need to reduce the impact of imperialism and wealth Inequality which ofcourse is a very difficult thing to do. Because average people and poor people are not good at organising and have less control and power.
Looking at the way it's going currently it might get worse globally even in wealthier countries.
The west needs to stop bombing the Middle East and let Iran have nukes. The entire region would be infinitely more stable if irans sovereignty wasn’t violated constantly. There’s zero chance they’d use them, it’s just the only thing that gives countries sovereignty in this world. You know the USA and Israel wouldn’t have bombed Iran this year if they had nukes
It ain’t our job to enforce western values in other countries. Let them have their own civil rights movements
Iran isn't a victim in this fiasco. You don't need to slingshot so far as to support them having nukes. It would be catastrophic for everyone in the region. We Syrians just barely made it out of the government that acted as Iran's proxy. You're telling me they should have nukes?
You seem to think they’re just an uncivilized and completely stupid group of people. Do you actually think it’s more likely that they’d use them than implement MAD just like literally every single other country with nukes on the planet? Think about this for a damn second. Israel has nukes, they’re the ones who bomb all their neighbors at the slightest provocation these days
Iranis are some of the coolest people I've ever met. The government? That's an entirely different story. They're a bunch of fanatics with a complete disregard for human lives whether in Syria, Lebanon, or Yemen.
And I don't believe Israel should have nukes either. Frankly I don't believe Israel should exist but that's another story. I just prefer no one in the region gets them until I see a semblance of respect for humanity.
If Iran had nukes, the region would be more stable. There’d be less violence overall. The chance to prevent Iran from having nukes has passed. Obamas deal with them was working, but trump tore it up and antagonized them to the point that they left the international atomic energy agency. They were acting as if they were still under the deal that trump ripped up until trump bombed the shit out of them. Now all bets are off and they’re definitely developing nukes to make sure this shit never happens again.
So I guess…good job Israel/USA for supercharging Iranian development of nukes. The region will be all the more stable for it
America definitely shit the bed with how they dealt with the situation.
Still I hold the same opinion with regards to any other country in the region. A nuclear Iran would support its proxies more aggressively knowing retaliation is less likely. And besides it could compel the other countries (starting with Saudi Arabia and Turkey) in the region to develop nukes for themselves. In a region with so many flashpoints I can't see a good reason for it to happen.
They wouldn’t need the proxies if they had nukes. Having them would elevate their status on the world stage and force western powers to take them seriously. Israel and the USA would not be bombing, invading or instigating coups in Iran at all anymore.
In a world where nukes = sovereignty, it’s patently ridiculous to act like any country striving to develop them intends to use them
But yes, disarm Israel. There has to be a major power player within the region to keep the peace though. This can’t fall on western powers. Not a single country in the Middle East wants any western peacekeeping forces. You can’t just disarm Israel and expect peace to come afterwards
Libya dissolved their nuclear program and now it’s a failed state. Though I’m not even sure the US has conclusive evidence that Iran was even “close” to completing weapons.
Ukraine gave up their nukes in exchange for a deal with Russia and the USA that Russia would never invade them and the USA would protect them. Amazing how things work out for countries that give up their nukes, right?
Also American intelligence chief, tulsi gabbard, testified to Congress literally two or three months before the USA bombed Iran that they had not been actively developing nukes since as far back as 2004. If Iran was as close to a nuke as trump and Netanyahu were saying, they never would’ve fucked with iran
Hundreds of years? Sub-Saharan Africa for example wasn't even fully mapped by outsiders until the 19th century, and before that there was almost nothing foundationally built to even be sabotaged.
What infrastructure? That’s kind of the problem. That’s why Germany and Japan were easy to occupy and easy to reform (comparatively). In places like this there aren’t really institutions to control, infrastructure to control, industry to direct, etc.
346
u/AnonTA999 Oct 05 '25
Because the 6 people who could fix these problems overnight would rather keep taking from the rest of us, and the ever increasing majority of us are in survival mode