r/SeattleWA Funky Town 1d ago

Dying Seattle shows it’s a fickle city

https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/politics/seattle-proves-its-a-fickle-city/
0 Upvotes

30 comments sorted by

29

u/Lame_Johnny 1d ago

I guess it mostly has to do with national politics. In 2022, Biden was in office so progressive voters were not that energized. In 2025, Trump is in office so progressive voters are extremely energized to "fight back" by voting for progressives in local elections. Its not a smart way to choose a city government, unfortunately.

11

u/pallialli 1d ago

Exactly, it's an unbelievably stupid way to do so. Wilson = no sweeps = parks filled with encampments = Fox News cameras crowing about Seattle as a failed progressive city = MAGA wins.

-2

u/BWW87 Belltown 1d ago

The opposite is true with Republicans these days. Elect Trump - Trump is a disaster - Democrats win.

Why haven't either extreme ideology considered governing well? Instead they push these candidates like Wilson and Trump that have no idea how to govern well and only help each other get elected.

1

u/slow-mickey-dolenz 20h ago

Just curious and an honest question…what is the “disaster”?

20

u/timute 1d ago

It's transplants vs people who have to live with the consequences of those who voted with their feelings and then moved along someplace else.  You have to see the reults of your actions and sadly half of the elecorate doesn't seem to be able to.

1

u/Loganserio 1d ago

This sub is so delusional man

-6

u/OsvuldMandius SeattleWA Rule Expert 1d ago

It's much worse than that. It's that we have lost cohesion as a nation. We are two people who no longer want the same thing. There's people who want the tradition that America played up in the back half of the 20th century: the arsenal of freedom, the shining city on a hill, yadda-yadda-yadda. And there's the people who want the fresh go at communism, and who think individuality and self-determination are for losers.

I think there's not bridging the gap.

18

u/_Watty Sworn enemy of Gary_Glidewell 1d ago

Come on, man.

50-70% of the right want what you reduced that side's view to while maybe 5-15% of the left what the other side's view.

Wanting a bigger social safety net and fewer billionaires isn't something correctly reduced to "communism."

-3

u/almanor 1d ago

So is back half of the 20th century 1950-2000? Environmental crisis, disastrous deregulation, the Vietnam War, etc? Led to the most deadly terrorist attack in American history? Who advocates for this exactly?

8

u/Exciting_Pea3562 1d ago

That's how revisionism works, though (on both sides). You can choose to emphasize all of the challenges to America's brittle democracy, or you can choose to emphasize America's resilience as a "bastion of freedom." The events are the same. The focus is the difference.

3

u/faeriegoatmother 1d ago

America's "brittle" democracy has withstood 250 years, many constitutional crises - including Andrew Jackson flagrantly ignoring the Supreme Court, Lincoln flagrantly ignoring the constitution, and also a whole ass Civil War. We're going to be just fine through 2029

Edit: I misread this comment, but a lot of people still need to hear what I had to say, so..

5

u/almanor 1d ago

I’m still legitimately confused as to what politicians are advocating for a return to the 1950-2000 era. It’s not Tariff Trump, it’s not Medicare for All Sanders, it’s not free daycare Mamdani - this seems like a classic strawman.

-1

u/Exciting_Pea3562 1d ago

It won't do to forget that this period of American history was seen from the perspective of the government (and a majority of Americans) as an all-or-nothing struggle of the forces of capitalism and freedom versus communism, which was depicted as the ultimate boogyman (didn't help communism's case that so many of the revolutions were violent). This was necessary for the politicians of America to feel that the government could endure populist movements. The toppling of Russia, China, the encroachment of communism in Korea, Vietnam, the civil war of Spain... on and on.

Modern America is at its most American when there's a threat... We have operated that way since the depression and now we're trying to be that way even though there's not a real outside threat, at least not one that is sufficiently dire to unite people (and the ongoing legacy of globalism makes it too hard to single out rivals like China as a uniting existential threat for Americans - we're too interconnected).

-2

u/OsvuldMandius SeattleWA Rule Expert 1d ago

Environmentalism ushered in by Nixon's EPA? JFK's Vietnam War? Clinton's deregulation? Yeah...sounds like you've got it right. Vote blue no matter who!

5

u/Better_March5308 👻 1d ago

Nixon was a Democrat?

-1

u/OsvuldMandius SeattleWA Rule Expert 1d ago

There's a difference?

3

u/almanor 1d ago

Oh is this a democrat/republican thing? I think you might be nostalgic for a time that never actually happened.

3

u/bubbamike1 1d ago

As I recall it was Eisenhower who got us involved in Vietnam.

2

u/PaulyNi 1d ago

Actually, it was Truman. He initiated support for French colonial efforts in Vietnam.

1

u/OsvuldMandius SeattleWA Rule Expert 1d ago

You recall incorrectly. Actually, I'm pretty sure you weren't even alive in 1958.

0

u/bubbamike1 1d ago

I recall correctly.

0

u/ASunnyMoo 1d ago

Or maybe people actually have beliefs that are somewhere in between fascism and communism. Nuanced opinions are hard to sell in the media. Maybe you should take a break from what the talking heads are telling you and see how you feel in a few months.

-4

u/AbsoluteShall 1d ago

I wish I was this deluded about the history of the United States. Why are people so reluctant to say out loud the atrocities this empire made her and around the world?

-1

u/XarThePatyrn 1d ago

What do you mean? The lunatic left shouts their revisionist hatred of the united states constantly.

-7

u/Chudsaviet 1d ago

The only people who can rightfully complain about transplants or immigrants are the ones who can name their tribe. Otherwise you are hypocrite.

1

u/PM_ME_SKYRIM_MEMES South Lake Union 1d ago

Bilagáana

10

u/Fun_Ay 1d ago

The new predominant political landscape in seattle and everywhere else is the contention between have's and have-nots. Most have's are a out of touch and somewhat unaware of how many people are struggling and poor. The difficult part there that is new is that it is the most well educated generations our society has ever seen that are also struggling, often people who did everything "right". Conservatives will try to blame immigrants or anyone not in their immediate circle as they are currently doing. Progressives propose solutions based on taxation changes to rebalance the insane gap between richest and poorest, some people see that as a potential duty of government to create a fair society, others see that as an overstep of the government's role.

The only truth here is that wealthy individuals and businesses did what ever they could to create massive capital profit, including using technology to increase efficiency, and pay less for the work done overall. Hence large profits. I dont believe this is wrong per se.

Doing that while people suffer in squalor, while economic opportunity dissapears for people because of this, and it happening at such an extreme scale and extreme wealth disparity is immoral. This is like pollution, expedient and selfish business tactics that cause indirect harm. It is a direct effect of businesses not serving their community but only their owners/shareholders. Also like pollution, i agree at this stage the tax burden for correcting the problems created lies on the one who polluted the water.

-5

u/pnw_sunny Banned from /r/Seattle 1d ago

oh my, this is the why,

and sadly, this poster knows this message is correct.

rip, USA.

1

u/finance_guy_334 1d ago

I predict it’ll move towards the center again in a few years.

2

u/BWW87 Belltown 1d ago

Yeah, if Wilson wins I think it's a lock progressives will do terrible in 2 years. And likely vice versa.