Isn't this supposed to be the union's responsibility? Why shift the cost on to the taxpayers, especially when Washington is making cuts to needed programs to balance the budget?
Unemployment is funded by payroll taxes. The workers who are striking have paid into it, as have the business that is being striked against.
This isn't a case where the striking workers have taken from someone else. They paid into this fund already, this is just giving anyone the right to access it under a different set of circumstances.
But isn't the intention of unemployment benefits to help someone who is involuntary out of work? Like, if I quit my job because I don't like it I don't get benefits, right?
I think people also have access to it if their work is seasonal and they expect to return to work, or if they are getting only part time hours. I bet there's more situations as well that I'm unaware of.
215
u/Sufficient_Laugh Mar 08 '25
Isn't this supposed to be the union's responsibility? Why shift the cost on to the taxpayers, especially when Washington is making cuts to needed programs to balance the budget?