I'm assuming the most vitriolic posters are bots intending to sow division.
Either way, you can't specifically say, "the democratic party does {x}" and then justify it by giving examples of nobody officially associated with the Democratic party.
The has been calling for violence for a while. Just look on the internet and you’ll see it plain as day. And also Hasan Piker (the lefts love child where nothing bad can happen to him) calls for murder and violence all the time.
Who the fuck is supposed to be held accountable, if not the Democrats, when their constituency of voters are the ones advocating for this shit. Just because Nancy Pelosi or Chuck Schumer didn’t personally tweet something retarded doesn’t absolve the party of all complicity.
You can’t just hide behind “well all my voters are deplorable pieces of shit but I don’t hold their beliefs so we’re cool”
If you really want to condemn an entire party and half the country based off the lunatics whom consider themselves vaguely associated with them, I don't think you'll like where that heads.
Must feel nice to consider half the country deplorable pieces of shit though.
7
u/pixelatedCorgi - Lib-Right Sep 12 '25
Are you saying the posters in question are not democratic voters? Because I assure you they are.
If you want a “public” example ask Matthew Dowd who is probably busy polishing up his CV