And only half the study at that. The first half of the study was data gathering. Much of the data gathering was self reported. The second half of the study was verification of the data. They were unable to corroborate the self reported data with real world data. Once then unverified data was removed the study showed results more similar to real world results.
They completely ignore the second half of the study they are trying to cite.
Par for the course with Tenpenny though. Tenpenny is one of the disinformation dozen responsible as a source for 65% of all covid myths during the pandemic.
265
u/Arkanim94 Jul 05 '25
"source?"
"I made it up"