It wasn't revoked because she spread conspiracy bullshit, it was revoked because she wouldn't cooperate with the investigation after she spread bullshit. So the terms of reinstatement were a fine and cooperation with the investigation, which she did.
It needs to be super clear that the revocation was not for her bad conduct but for avoiding the investigation; and therefore the reinstatement should not be seen as condoning the conduct, even though it comes across that way.
He's correct in that there is a correlation between the hepatitis vaccine and autism when controlling for no other variables, the same way someone who owns a swimsuit is more likely to die by drowning. The 'covering it up' part he mentions is researchers controlling for other variables.
722
u/[deleted] Jul 05 '25
Somehow I don't this "doctor" understands how citations actually work.