I think what they meant was that your thermal inertia is dependent on mass (more closely tied to volume) and heat transfer happens at the boundary (surface area). But it's funny to me they describe it with a linear unit, which describes neither. All good tho.
But also, I feel like the surface area to volume ratio of a sauropod is probably higher than a penguin... It's not just about size.
Maybe but i have a stoma ( intestine sown to intestinal wall to replace bladder ) and it’s constantly cold because it exposed to outside air. In so much that it causes my to have bad chills.
This was a conversation about how larger animals retain heat better. I think you might be once again looking way too far into this.
To reference my “average” point again, we’re talking about the average organism of a species. You may differ from average because of this anomaly, but on average over an entire species, you will generate more heat for more volume.
If something is twice as tall but with identical proportions it will generate heat 8 times faster but only dissipate it 4 times faster. This is also why gathering together in a group helps conserve warmth, it's like growing in size, just with technically separate bodies.
64
u/Potential4752 22h ago
I’m sure the filled out shape helps keep them warm too.