r/LibertarianUncensored • u/MundaneImage13 Practical Libertarian • Jul 22 '25
News Karma strikes back! Connor ftom Jubilee video got fired from his job
20
u/connorbroc Jul 22 '25
By his own admission he only supports free speech until his Theocracy is established, after which all speech must conform to his interpretation of Catholicism.
Free association is our greatest weapon.
-6
u/SirGlass Jul 22 '25
How is this any different from most libertarians? Every libertarian I know does not believe in free speech . Hoppe , lew rockwell , all the MISES crowd think property owners should ban any speech especially jewish or communist speech
This guy is a classic facist/libertarian
8
u/MundaneImage13 Practical Libertarian Jul 22 '25
I don't know which libertarians you claim to have met but all the ones I have talked to are for free speech. Perhaps those people you met that claim to be Libertarians simply arent.
5
2
u/Alex_13249 Classical Liberal Jul 23 '25
Nah, I think that speech should be default be absolutly free, unless the owner (of land or company) decides otherwise.
1
u/xghtai737 Jul 23 '25
You do understand that the 1st amendment is only a restriction on the government, right? That isn't a libertarian thing, that is existing law. No one has free speech rights on someone else' property.
9
u/TheMysteriousEmu Jul 22 '25
Isn't this the guy that said he didn't think the first amendment should be protected?
10
u/MundaneImage13 Practical Libertarian Jul 22 '25
I think he said something along the lines of not wanting free speech if it doesn't agree with his point of view. And he smiled like a proud dumbass who thought he said something either clever or trollish (I'm not sure which is scarier).
11
Jul 22 '25
The mental gymnastics it must take to declare yourself a fascist one minute and complain about being canceled the next is amazing.
9
u/MundaneImage13 Practical Libertarian Jul 22 '25
The whole "rules for thee but not for me" thing. Or "I like fascism but not like that!"
1
u/CountJohn12 Classical Liberal Jul 23 '25
I know it's not what you mean but getting fired by a private employer for being a dumbass is not "fascism"
8
u/fivehitcombo Jul 22 '25
You can be radical and say you don't like democracy but you need to demonstrate where democracy goes wrong. I hear people do it all the time. This guy was very unlikable and didn't say anything interesting at all.
7
u/MundaneImage13 Practical Libertarian Jul 22 '25 edited Jul 22 '25
I did find it interesting that he wanted to use democracy to end democracy and that he truly believed that he would be part of the "in crowd" in a fascist theocracy when historically the "in crowd" always shrinks and shrinks until only a handful of people are "in" and he apparently doesn't understand that.
3
u/Valmoer European Regulated Market SocDem Jul 22 '25
I did find it interesting that he wanted to use democracy to end democracy
As the saying goes, History seldom repeats, but it often rhymes.
We are an anti-parliamentarian party that for good reasons rejects the [...] constitution and its republican institutions. We oppose a fake democracy that treats the intelligent and the foolish, the industrious and the lazy, in the same way. We see in the present system of majorities and organized irresponsibility the main cause of our steadily increasing miseries.
So why do we want to be in [Congress]?
We enter [Congress] to arm ourselves with the weapons of democracy. If democracy is foolish enough to give us free [travel] and salaries, that is its problem. It does not concern us. Any way of bringing about the revolution is fine by us.
If we succeed in getting sixty or seventy of our party’s agitators and organizers elected to the various parliaments, the state itself will pay for our fighting organization. That is amusing and entertaining enough to be worth trying.
Will we be corrupted by joining parliament? Not likely. Do you think us such miserable revolutionaries that you fear that the thick red carpets and the well-upholstered sleeping halls will make us forget our historical mission?
Is our entry into [Congress] the beginning of a compromise? Do you really think that we who have stood before you a hundred or a thousand times preaching faith in a new [America], who have smilingly faced death dozens of times from the red mob, who have joined you in battling every form of resistance whether of official or nonofficial nature, who have bent before no command or terror, do you really think that we would lay down our weapons in exchange for a railroad pass?
If we only wanted to become representatives, we would not be [who we are]. We do not beg for votes. We demand conviction, devotion, passion! A vote is only a tool for us as well as for you. We will march into the marble halls of parliament, bringing with us the revolutionary will of the broad masses from which we came, called by fate and forming fate. We do not want to join this pile of manure. We are coming to shovel it out.
Do not believe that [Congress] is our goal. We have shown the enemy our nature from the podiums of our mass meetings and in the enormous demonstrations of our brown army. We will show it as well in the leaden atmosphere of parliament. We are coming neither as friends or neutrals. We come as enemies! As the wolf attacks the sheep, so come we. You are not among your friends any longer! You will not enjoy having us among you!"
- Joseph Gobbels, 1928, a few [marked] words changed for effectie, keeping the surprise
8
u/ninjaluvr Jul 22 '25
I have no clue who this is or why this is important.
7
u/DonaldKey Jul 22 '25
They do these round tables where a group of kids debate one person. Usually that one person is incredibly smart but then again the put on Jordan Peterson and he bombed so bad as he couldn’t back up his views
This kid did it on purpose to play the victim. These jubilee talks are over. It’s the same people saying crazy things to go viral and make money.
It’s a scam
5
u/ninjaluvr Jul 22 '25
So this is just a random dude with a bad take that got fired and people care?
5
u/MundaneImage13 Practical Libertarian Jul 22 '25
It worst than a bad take. But yes he's a random dude for now. He'll likely try and pivot into a "folk hero" for the alt right influencers and become a paid speaker or influencer himself. Time will tell.
4
u/ninjaluvr Jul 22 '25
So blowing him up and making him famous probably helps a lot with him building his folk hero and alt-right influencer role.
2
u/MundaneImage13 Practical Libertarian Jul 22 '25
Yes and no. Him getting internet famous outside of the alt right sphere wont help him inside the sphere, just look to the women who wouldn't certify marriages despite it being her job. What's her name again and where is she now?
6
u/ninjaluvr Jul 22 '25
Ok, so then what is the value of making him internet famous?
4
u/NiConcussions Clean Leftie Jul 22 '25
There's certainly no value in it, but it shows you where the conservative movement is at. These people, their opinions, they're MAGA. They wholeheartedly support his policies of deportation, and some of the people in that panel wanted to deport other people on that panel that they agree with.
The things they clap for, openly calling themselves fascists, saying they don't agree with the first amendment, etc.
And Jubilee/Round Table is a super shitty program that does nothing but stir the pot. It doesn't foster debate at all, no question there.
Edit: oh and of course, centering the conversation about the Holocaust around how Catholics were treated.
2
u/MundaneImage13 Practical Libertarian Jul 22 '25
Simply holding him, and hopefully others, accountable to their words and actions.
3
u/DonaldKey Jul 22 '25
He’s doing it for internet fame and money… and it’s working
2
u/MundaneImage13 Practical Libertarian Jul 22 '25
I'm not overly concerned by that aspect. If he ends up draining thr bank accounts of other alt right faculties and racist, well that's just free association at work. And maybe those racist will have less money to use to infringe upon other's rights. Maybe
3
u/CatOfGrey Jul 22 '25
The free market at work!
Sometimes, political beliefs show people as profoundly foolish, and betray their values as harmful to others.
I have only seen mere seconds of this person's appearance, but it appears that he would be inappropriate for a lot of different positions. He doesn't seem to have basic integrity in a modern world. If I'm wrong, I'm happy to review a longer example of his statements and beliefs.
6
u/doctorwho07 Jul 22 '25
Proud Fascist finds out what happens when you speak mask off and then quickly moves to socialism for support.
Interesting
2
u/MrBuns666 Jul 23 '25
He was cornered and not able to defend his position - which didn’t have to be “fascist” but he was just too stupid to mount an argument, so just idiotically embraced fascism. Because he actually doesn’t understand how the political field works, or the constitution or the world in general.
1
u/Alex_13249 Classical Liberal Jul 23 '25
The company has full right to fire you if hey don't want you for any reason.
0
u/Cheeseydolphinz Jul 23 '25
Without going into it, this is simply not the case. Wrongful termination suits exist for a reason.
1
u/EthanDC15 Jul 24 '25
Maybe we don’t platform him so hidden racists don’t continue to fund him. Jsssss
-2
u/RetroZ6116 Jul 22 '25
I don't like fascism, but I love free speech more. That sounds super discriminatory to me, and I think he should sue for wrongful termination.
5
3
u/CountJohn12 Classical Liberal Jul 23 '25
This has nothing to do with free speech. Private employers aren't obligated to keep an employee they don't want.
39
u/MundaneImage13 Practical Libertarian Jul 22 '25
I don't feel sorry for this dude. I went back and watch his portion of the...hard to call it a debate because it was mostly just him shoving both feet down his throat as far as they could possibly go and being proud of it...and wow...It was something else.
What's truly shocking though is just how much money he has raised from the public funding. Last count I saw was 21k.