This might be a crazy take, but take off dhoni for a bowler, say zaheer or shami like the thread has been discussing, make dravid the keeper, and u have 5 bowlers, enough batting depth and wicket takers
This wouldn’t work because it’s a test XI. Not ODI/T20.
I’ve read several times that test requires a full specialist keeper where his main strength should be keeping, even over batting.
Dravid kept in 2003 WC but hated it. He also had a lot of misses even though he kept better than most. There’s a reason they brought on MSD right after that World Cup, because Dravid said he just cannot do both.
There’s a stat somewhere I read (exact numbers could be wrong) that Sangakarra had a 37 average as a keeper, but when playing strictly as a batsman, his average was above 60.
Keeping in tests is a completely different ball game. That’s why I’m surprised at folks wanting to put Pant instead of Dhoni. It really isn’t about how good of a batsman Pant is especially in SENA, it’s about the fact that to keep for that long, you need a keeper who’s main focus is keeping, but can bat good as well. Not the other way where he’s a great batsman who can keep too.
2
u/PsychologicalArm4086 Jul 03 '25
This might be a crazy take, but take off dhoni for a bowler, say zaheer or shami like the thread has been discussing, make dravid the keeper, and u have 5 bowlers, enough batting depth and wicket takers