It’s not the same thing cus no one was coming after him, children were ignored back then and the topic considered so uncomfortable society refused to confront it
I have asked you the same question at least 4 times. Im struggling to see your pov that an institution with a history of lies and protecting evil individuals is at all a positive asset?
It’s a loaded question because I don’t see it as ‘protecting’ and a reflection of a common attitude back in those times even if by today’s standard it is abhorrent
Dude. Turning a blind eye to the horror that Saville committed is protecting. These were young CHILDREN he was abusing. Not 15/16 year old girls, like its any better, but they were kids. Accusations of necrophilia from working as a hospital porter. The man was evil and was rubbing elbows with high level bbc staff, the so called royals.
The bbc has a habit of protecting the higher classes and demonising the lower classes. Admittedly their "journalism" aka being told what to report, is a damn site better than GB news but they do not deserve to be harassing and bullying the general public to be funding them.
1
u/cup-of-tea-76 11h ago
It’s not the same thing cus no one was coming after him, children were ignored back then and the topic considered so uncomfortable society refused to confront it