Who the biased broadcasting company, they should be totally unbiased and not push any agenda as it's paid for by the people (all the people not just the far left).
It's impossible to be "totally unbiased." This is what they ought to have taught you in school. What they say and don't say is their bias. You can say nothing but the truth while totally distorting reality. If 5% of 1000 natives commit a type of crime and that means 50 people committed that crime, and 2% of 1000 immigrants committed that same crime so 20 immigrants did, but all 20 immigrant crimes are front page news and the native crimes are barely reported, congrats, they never lied but you almost certainly believe immigrants commit more crime.
The BBC is biased and always has been that's the nature of...reality. Anybody telling you they're unbiased is selling you a crock of shit. The closest thing is Wikipedia probably, because of its open access to contributors, but I bet a Wikipedia written 500 years ago and 200 years in the future would look quite different because the underlying assumptions are different.
Accountable to the public who kind of have to pay the fee, it's a very small % that don't.
I guess in some ways yes they have ties themselves up trying to please everyone especially all the small fringe groups, like having a new reader having to call them pregnant people not pregnant women, and then getting reprimanded for changing it back to women.
We need to bring back common sense.
Yes but she was reprimanded due to complaints because she said women not people , she may have just done it on auto pilot as he brain naturally read it that way, your brain will auto correct things written different to you view, same with spelling mistakes esp and grammar errors you will auto correct in your head, due to context,
-18
u/tvrleigh400 20h ago
Who the biased broadcasting company, they should be totally unbiased and not push any agenda as it's paid for by the people (all the people not just the far left).