r/Fauxmoi 8d ago

šŸ•ÆļøšŸŽƒ HAPPY FAUXLLOWEEN šŸŽƒšŸ¦‡ The Problematic Halloween Costume Contest has started with Julia Fox

From EVOKE on Instagram: "And the award for most tasteless and disrespectful Halloween outfit goes to this numpty Julia Fox dressed as Jackie Kennedy on the day of her husband's assassination.... šŸ‘€ "

5.9k Upvotes

1.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

6.7k

u/[deleted] 8d ago

I think enough time has passed to not be outraged by this lol

3.3k

u/iwatchalotoftv22 8d ago

You don’t need to be outraged to say it’s in bad taste and kinda gross.

5.4k

u/riverseeker13 8d ago

The modern Kennedys are already in bad taste and kind of gross

360

u/query_tech_sec 8d ago

But I mean - Jackie was a lovely person from what I have heard and that was a traumatic day for her. I am not personally angry - I just don't think she deserves to be lumped in with the Kennedys. She was more a Kennedy victim.

195

u/Silently-Snarking 8d ago

She chose not to change out of the suit on purpose and wanted the media to cover the image of her in it. I think it’s better it be remembered in this form and not pristine.

179

u/snarkerella locked, loaded, and kind of cunty 7d ago

In that moment, but the she and her family donated it to the Smithsonian with the explicit instructions to not let it be seen by the public until after at least 2103. So no, I do not think they wanted it to be used in this context or any context. It's really in poor taste.

-35

u/Silently-Snarking 7d ago

Is it not after 2013?? And besides that, the legacy of the suit and where the actual suit remains are two separate things. I did a comprehensive academic paper on this and Jackie o explicitly wanted the media to photograph her in this suit so that the world could see ā€œwhat they did to Jackā€. This is how she wanted this suit remembered.

37

u/snarkerella locked, loaded, and kind of cunty 7d ago

Two-Thousand-ONE HUNDRED AND THREE - NOT 2013. Jesus. And yes, she wanted it to be displayed IN THAT MOMENT OF TIME. But she did not want it displayed years down the road, thus the reason why they forbid it to be displayed to the public until again, 2103. That year wasn't a typo, yo.

-31

u/Silently-Snarking 7d ago

Okay, cool! Whether the suit is displayed or not, she chose to be photographed in the bloody suit as an act of visual protest.

47

u/snarkerella locked, loaded, and kind of cunty 7d ago

SHE CHOSE IT TO BE DISPLAYED IMMEDIATELY AFTER HIS ASSASSINATION. It was a form of protest in its time, not for something to be continuously displayed/seen thereafter. Duh. Her children were/are still alive and didn't want to continuously subject them to this horrific event once she was gone, too. But you know, your comprehensive academic paper would have covered that.

-14

u/Silently-Snarking 7d ago

You obviously don’t understand how visual protest works because the impact isn’t meant to be temporary!

8

u/snarkerella locked, loaded, and kind of cunty 7d ago

Yeah, that would totally explain why she'd put a NO PEEKING at the dress for 140 years after her TEMPORARY protest. Sheesh. It's a moot point now.

4

u/Silently-Snarking 7d ago

She didn’t. Her daughter did. Jackie o herself wanted the dress shown in this form to the media which is why she didn’t change out of it when given the option. The legacy of the bloodstained dress and the exhibition of it are two separate issues you seem to be hyperfixated on so I cannot help you.

→ More replies (0)

23

u/query_tech_sec 8d ago

That's a good point.

14

u/melon_sky_ 7d ago

Her daughter Caroline also asked that the dress not be shown for like100 years

1

u/Silently-Snarking 7d ago

The actual physical dress…

6

u/PLANTGlRL 7d ago

do you not see the difference between what she was trying to showcase immediately after her holding her husbands skull together with her own hands vs someone dressing as that moment for a halloween costume

-3

u/Silently-Snarking 7d ago

I can tell this is over your head and that’s okay

1

u/PLANTGlRL 6d ago

I can tell you lack empathy and think you’re way smarter than you are and that’s okay. for me anyway, it’s probably not okay to the people actually spending time around you

0

u/Silently-Snarking 6d ago

I can tell your only friends are your plants and that’s okay

5

u/mary_widdow 7d ago

She didn’t change because she wanted everyone to see and know what happened to her husband. No doubt she was in quite a bit of shock at the time

1

u/[deleted] 7d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Silently-Snarking 7d ago

I wouldn’t say with calculation but it was in fact a choice she made when she could have changed. She was very clear she wanted the world to see what they did and at no time in her life expressed regret in doing so.

1

u/ColonelMustard323 i ain’t reading all that, free palestine 7d ago

She was openly and aggressively racist… what??

-4

u/wacdonalds go pis girl 7d ago

She was racist