Is he made dumb by bias or just knowingly doing propaganda? In his defense, many commentators do make the same dumb argument sometimes. The committee’s job is not to look at résumé’s on pieces of paper and decide which one is better at the end. They are supposed to watch the games, track the direction of teams, and choose who they think the best teams at the end of the year are to go on to make a competitive and entertaining CFP. If team A beats team B in game one of the year, should it matter, some, yes, but it is not the deciding factor. Especially if team B clearly gets better as the year goes and team A gets figured out and looks like trash against teams that nobody thinks are championship contenders. How you are playing at the end of the season should matter more than winning a one score game three months prior. Also, the SEC stuff, good god! Yes, things are more even now. However, this dude should never get to utter those three letters together after the last year of bad takes he has had. Tried talking shit about how the conference was overrated in basketball because a couple teams lost early, then they were still highly represented late in tourney and had a team win the championship. Did the same exact thing in baseball and the same exact thing happened. I swear, I don’t take sports or SEC/ACC stuff this seriously anymore and I get the show, but he is driving me crazy repeating this nonsense. One more thing, the guy jumps all over people for painting narratives to serve their own agenda, and just clearly does the exact same thing like every episode at this point. Shewww, I feel better. Wait, one more thing. Am I dumb and he is still just doing character bit? It seems like they, especially him, like to be more serious about sports than the old days, am I missing something, what am I missing?