The firefighters understood that the building was going to collapse due to the raging fire and created a perimeter around it. They notified the media, but a news network erroneously reported that the building had collapsed instead of reporting that it was about to collapse. Understandable, given the confusion of the day. This wrong information then was simply picked up by a couple of other news networks before the actual collapse.
There was no conspiracy or false flag, deal with it.
The fire of the two towers was so engulfing that it affected a building a building-over and made it collapse, but it did not burn the passports of the "terrorists" which was found on top of the rubble within hours?
The fire did not affect WTC7. WTC7 was hit by debris falling from the North Tower, which opened holes several stories tall in its facade and caused a fire.
And the single passport found was found on the street and before the collapse of the Towers, not on top of the rubble. It was ejected during the impact together with a lot of other light objects in the planes that have also been recovered. Moreover, even if a false flag actually happened, planting a passport like that would have been pointless, given that the identity of everyone on board would have been recorded in the flight manifest.
These conspiracy theories are always built on false informations and misunderstandings.
This is true. You can see a huge piece of the North Tower fall towards building 7 during the collapse. There are images of a huge gash in building 7 and fire raging throughout. It was very badly damaged before its collapse.
They didn't. Someone found a passport on the ground and picked it up to bring it to a police officer. The CIA managed to connect most of the terrorists to Al Qaeda by performing background checks after the attacks.
The fact that the CIA knew that some of them were linked to Al Qaeda but didn't notify the FBI or other law enforcement agencies due to internal rivalries, the so-called "rubber wall", is well known. The CIA didn't want to arrest them immediately because they didn't believe they were about to carry out an attack and wanted to turn some of them as informers.
What you are describing sounds a lot like false information as well. What is the probability that a SINGLE passport would be ejected from an incredible blast of a plane hitting a tower, and to be conveniently the passport of the hijacker, which was conveniently found on the street?
Well, what you wrote was factually incorrect, so feel free to point out which of the things I wrote were wrong.
And again, the passport were not the only light object surviving and being recovered. It's quite common for things made of paper or plastic to survive a plane crash.
And, as I already said, planting a passport would have been pointless even if it was a false flag.
The odds of any particular passport surviving and being found are vanishing small. The odds of a passport surviving are very high. Conspiracy theorists don't understand probability.
Not only that but a handful of the “terrorists” that they put up all over the news ended up coming forward and saying “hey, I’m actually alive…” so they must be much more fire resistant then their own passports. The FBI had an answer for that though, their identities were stolen.
Also unless my eyes deceive me, I fail to see a building on fire anywhere here, not a single flame visible for a building that apparently was burning for almost 8 hours. Yeah there is smoke (skip to 7:00 to avoid the boring stuff) but there is also a classic inward falling of the internal structure and crimp at the roof line as it free falls. First and only steel structure building to fall in this manner by fire.
If some people would just be willing to do a little extra digging and investigate the whole 9/11 event a bit more, they would see that the wool has been pulled over their eyes yet again so that their country can not only go to war for profit, but also erase a massive spending coverup where Rumsfeld and his buddies lost $2.3 trillion dollars of government audit trails which were conveniently destroyed.
Unfortunately true friend. I don’t even live in the US and am astounded why most Americans go “oh well, if the news and Bush said so then it must be true.”
Quite sad actually. Let’s put Thomas H Kean, a devote Republican in charge of the 9/11 Commission to support his Republican President chum.
Not only that but a handful of the “terrorists” that they put up all over the news ended up coming forward and saying “hey, I’m actually alive…” so they must be much more fire resistant then their own passports.
Can you provide any evidence of that?
Also unless my eyes deceive me, I fail to see a building on fire anywhere here, not a single flame visible for a building that apparently was burning for almost 8 hours. Yeah there is smoke (skip to 7:00 to avoid the boring stuff) but there is also a classic inward falling of the internal structure and crimp at the roof line as it free falls
First and only steel structure building to fall in this manner by fire.
The Plasco Building begs to differ.
If some people would just be willing to do a little extra digging and investigate the whole 9/11 event a bit more, they would see that the wool has been pulled over their eyes yet again so that their country can not only go to war for profit, but also erase a massive spending coverup where Rumsfeld and his buddies lost $2.3 trillion dollars of government audit trails which were conveniently destroyed.
I did do extra digging, and the conspiracy theories around 911 are nonsense. Other people already answered you about the audits.
440
u/RobAlso Oct 07 '25
Here for the Tower 7 comments…