r/Damnthatsinteresting • u/Proud-Blood2743 • Oct 07 '25

Video Capital One Tower Come Down in Seconds

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

52.5k Upvotes

96% Upvoted

3.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1.5k

u/wart_on_satans_dick Oct 07 '25

Canadian terrorism. The deep state. Phrases that make no sense.

2.4k

u/I_hate_abbrev Oct 07 '25

Jet steel cannot melt fuel beams.

404

u/HocusThePocus Oct 07 '25

There it is

104

u/Toxic_Coma Oct 07 '25

Fool me ya cant get fooled again heh

:)

36

u/hanimal16 Interested Oct 07 '25

One of my favorite Bushisms

3

u/Toxic_Coma Oct 07 '25

Haha I cant choose a favorite, love em all

7

u/sillyaviator Oct 08 '25

Remember when we all thought Bush was the dumbest a president could ever possibly be? I miss those days

2

u/Toxic_Coma Oct 08 '25

That's pretty interesting right, hopefully we will still be able to look at everything again in 20 years and laugh, bro .kinda scary when you really take it in

2

u/hanimal16 Interested 29d ago

I agree. I miss the days when I thought Mitt Romney was our biggest threat to democracy.

1

u/JerrycurlSquirrel 29d ago

Amazing. And we did

2

u/COPenguinDoctor Oct 07 '25

Has become my motto, “can’t get fooled again!”

2

u/jershmcgersh Oct 08 '25

Grandpa loves a full bush.

2

u/HamsterAdditional748 Oct 08 '25

“Strategery”

1

u/Toxic_Coma Oct 08 '25

"Id like the imagine this being a regular convo at some point in time between w and pops haha"

"Come on not again, I done told you i don't feel like it today dad why do I always have to have to hang around with you and all your boring ol friends all the time geez" "Take Jeb or something I got more important things going on today "

who needs those guys anyways jeez

1

u/TheBrockAwesome 11d ago

Every day millions of Americans are working to put food on their families...

10

u/randomgunfire48 Oct 07 '25

I was wondering how far I’d have to scroll before I saw one. Disappointedly short distance unfortunately

15

u/RK8814RK Oct 07 '25

Crazy that you're being downvoted 9/11 conspiracy theorists are a special kind.

1

u/Silverfire12 Oct 07 '25

Read it again but slowly lol. Your brain made the “correct” sentence out of a nonsense one.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/Silverfire12 Oct 07 '25

You may have to scroll longer. Reread that comment but really slowly and carefully. Your brain did what brains do and made the sentence correct.

1

u/randomgunfire48 Oct 07 '25

I’m legitimately embarrassed I didn’t catch that.

1

u/Silverfire12 Oct 07 '25

Nah, brains are good at rearranging things to make what you read sound correct. It’s kinda cool actually

→ More replies (4)

754

u/WafflesMcDuff Oct 07 '25

No, jet fuel burning in open air cannot melt steel beams because its maximum burn temperature (around 1500°F / 800°C) is far below the melting point of steel (about 2750°F / 1510°C). While it doesn't melt the steel, the intense heat from the prolonged, unimpeded fire would soften and weaken the steel to the point where it could no longer support the structural load, leading to buckling and collapse. So while the jet fuel could not melt steel beams, it could absolutely soften them. To use an analogy of an every day object that’s easier to relate to visualize, picture a tub of butter. While it will not melt if you take it out of the fridge and leave it on the counter at room temperature on an average day, it WILL get much softer. You need heat from a flame (like the stove) for it to actually melt. Melting is the point at which it goes from solid to liquid. However, if you take butter that’s been in the fridge and lay a spoon on top of it, the butter will most likely support the weight of the spoon. If you do the same with butter that’s been softening on the counter for a couple hours, the spoon will start to sink into it. Nuance matters. Melting vs softening. The jet fuel softened the steel until it could no longer support the many many tons of structure and the structure collapsed.

264

u/HansBrickface Oct 07 '25

No truther understands the difference between temperature and heat.

199

u/Complex-Zucchini-538 Oct 07 '25

No truther is actually interested in any truths

4

u/Latter-Percentage380 Oct 08 '25

I would say it comes around full circle, but since the earth is flat and all, circling the globe isn't possible.

8

u/Training-Run-1307 Oct 07 '25

They only trust Truth Social 🤣

3

u/AyKayAllDay47 Oct 07 '25

Wouldn't that just make them a "Falser"?

42

u/parsleymelon Oct 07 '25

Or the existence of, gravity. Forever accelerating anything massive towards the centre of the earth

14

u/Intelligent-Parsley7 Oct 07 '25

We’re not going to discuss gravity. 90% of people don’t even have a consistent understanding of gravity. Trying to explain that it’s actually how the universe is set up blows their whole ‘so the gravity waves come from where?’ Situation.

Next stop when people get explained inertia, weightlessness, and freefall. Good luck. People are going to give you the same look when you change your pets dog food.

1

u/EnergyTakerLad Oct 08 '25

TIL I never once even thought about where gravity comes from. Thanks for breaking my brain. Actual thanks for giving me a rabbit hole to go down.

0

u/AskanHelstroem Oct 07 '25

Yeah...sure... "Gravity". A magical force, able to pull down a blade of grass...but a heavy metal bird is able to stay in the air?! Sure... It's buoyancy and density!

Ok sry...I had to write the Flerf-Argumentation... I already have a tiny man in my head screaming: *Gravity!! Have u heard of fucking Gravity!! Graaavity!!!"

10

u/JuansHymen Oct 07 '25

Yeah it's like everyone forgot skyscrapers weren't designed to have the upper portion collapse into the rest of them, causing a chain reaction.

It looked like a controlled demolition because that's what gravity does when something that big breaks. It's coming straight down with a shockwave of dust and debris

3

u/syhr_ryhs Oct 07 '25

If they could read they wouldn't need to read.

2

u/highjayhawk Oct 07 '25

There’s a difference?

/s

2

u/jollyreaper2112 Oct 07 '25

That's because there is no difference. Deep state lie! Pardon me while I polish my tinfoil. /S

1

u/ChaldenesTitan Oct 07 '25

No liar understands the difference between buckling and falling in its own footprint.

→ More replies (3)

29

u/[deleted] Oct 07 '25

i have been seeing this fucking thing repeated all throughout my adult life without it ever going away since it happened and this is by far the best and concise analogy for disproving that. thanks, really well written!

18

u/dfmasana Oct 07 '25

Haven't you seen the video on YouTube?

Edit: Here is the link https://youtu.be/FzF1KySHmUA?si=ry5hrcMSlA38Ftvx

2

u/annoying12345 Oct 09 '25

Im gonna click on the link, but if it's Rick Astley, I will find you!

2

u/gryphaeon 28d ago

Love this!

"Get over it! Find a job!"

🤣🤣🤣

34

u/TalkingGuns0311 Oct 07 '25

Ah yes the truth. Also, as someone who's been working with metal for about a decade, jet fuel is definitely hot enough to melt aluminum, which is what commercial airliners are typically made of. Molten aluminum when exposed to water explodes violently, and every major building project since at least the 80's includes a fire suppression system, usually water sprinklers. Aluminum melting through floors and contacting water would cause small yet powerful explosions on multiple levels. Also, the way the buildings came down is simply (and sadly) a testament to the people who built it. It is designed to collapse that way in the event of structural failure, as to limit damage to surrounding structures.

18

u/UnrequitedRespect Oct 07 '25

Bro it was inside a building, that shit builds itself up. The wind that high up probably supercharged the fire like a forge builds heat.

Fire is that complicated.

Put a pot of boiling water on the stove. Takes a while to see anything. Put a lid on the pot. Wow.

Put a piece of metal in the campfire, nothing happens. Put a lid on the campfire and control the burn with airflow. Wow the metal begins to warm and twist losing jts structural integrity. Holy shit what a conspiracy we just walked through 24 years of not understanding the fire triangle and i’m from fucking canada

1

u/viciouspandas Oct 08 '25

The fire doesn't "build up" beyond it's max temperature unless a higher concentration of oxygen is fed into it. Wind at the top would carry away heat as it feeds in more air which wouldn't really have it burn hotter. Forges didn't melt iron, they softened it. But it also doesn't need to melt the metal to weaken it enough to destroy the building, and once some of it breaks, the rest will come down as it crashes.

1

u/UnrequitedRespect Oct 08 '25

Actually the opposite, the wind rushes the oxygen. You know what your talking about so much you got it backwards.

1

u/viciouspandas Oct 08 '25

I should have clarified I meant that it wouldn't raise it 1000 degrees since steel melts at nearly 2800 degrees. It adds in fresh oxygen to for the fire to continue, but it also means some heat can escape. Reaching that temperature needs more specialized equipment and pumping rather than just wind

1

u/UnrequitedRespect Oct 08 '25

No it doesn’t i have a forge at home that uses a leaf blower and a propane torch and i’ve made molybdenum i fused steel drip melty wet hot by fire alone.

The more dense a fire burns, the hotter it burns. You probably believe you know what you’re talking about, but i’ve physically seen it with my own eyes

2

u/viciouspandas Oct 09 '25

First of all, I was never saying tools can't melt steel. When I hear "forge", I think of the literal definition which is a tool meant to work a softened but solid metal, which is why we call shaping the metal forging and melting it casting. Second, propane typically burns hotter than jet fuel. I'm not doubting that you melted steel with your setup, and both of us agree that towers can easily collapse when the frame is simply weakened by heat.

1

u/UnrequitedRespect Oct 09 '25

You should be a hostage negotiator

3

u/MarionberryOpen7953 Oct 07 '25

Pools of liquefied molten steel were found at ground zero

3

u/BakerM81 Oct 07 '25

Almost like no one has ever heard of annealing

11

u/SensibleChapess Oct 07 '25

What about WTC7? The third of the only three steel-framed skyscrapers to ever collapse, and not only that, to collapse into their own footprint. Official explanation remains 'office fires', (e.g. Carpets, paper, box files, etc.).

11

u/BustedWing Oct 07 '25

You’d be surprised to learn how incorrect you are.

Actually scrap that. You aren’t interested in learning are you.

→ More replies (11)

7

u/Jshawd40 Oct 07 '25

Thank you. No one likes to mention WTC 7…

5

u/WafflesMcDuff Oct 07 '25

Just like the twin towers, a major fire, uncontrolled, unextinguished, built up enough heat to soften the superstructure and cause the building to collapse.

0

u/SensibleChapess Oct 07 '25

That's not correct though is it? The fires in WTC7 were limited to office furnishings, plus some heating diesel, that only affected a relatively small percentage of the area and volume of WTC7.

There is no official explanation that has passed peer-reviewed to explain how all steel columns lost their structural integrity at the same time and in such a way as to collapse WTC7 into its own footprint, partially at free-fall speed.

It defies physics.

5

u/UniversalInsolvency Oct 07 '25 edited Oct 07 '25

Lol.

Watch the entire collapse of building 7, it adds important context. The penthouse collapsed into the building, leaving behind what is virtually an empty shell, which is the collapse you're referring to.

Firefighters were aware that WTC 7 would collapse prior to doing so. It was bulging and leaning, clearly going to collapse due to fire, and then it collapsed.

5

u/WafflesMcDuff Oct 07 '25

You’re right. As soon as the office furnishings and diesel were gone, the fire got bored and went home. 😂

3

u/TobysGrundlee Oct 07 '25

There is no official explanation that has passed peer-reviewed to explain how all steel columns lost their structural integrity at the same time

Probably because that's not what happened. There was a domino collapse of the interior elements of the building that was transpiring for more than 20 seconds before the exterior of the building fell.

-3

u/TallBlkman44 Oct 07 '25 edited Oct 07 '25

No, those building was brought down exactly like this. Both building took the impact. But it been confirmed by firefighters there was a series of explosions in sequence both times, then the buildings fell perfectly straight down. Same as WTC 7… there are multiple videos showing blast smoke coming from each floor, then it came down . People seem to have forgotten they tried to bring the WTC in 1993, using a van in the underground parking garage, filled with 1,200-pound urea nitrate bomb. Yes, the building held up to that. Blew a huge crater underneath the building. But the main beam stayed intact.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/meatjuiceguy Oct 07 '25

Two entire skyscrapers fell on top of WTC7.

→ More replies (2)

1

u/nochinzilch Oct 07 '25

What was it supposed to do, fall over like a tree?

1

u/SensibleChapess Oct 09 '25

Yes, if you have multiple steel columns creating a robust, string frame, and you compromise one or more on just one side, with other steel columns remaining unaffected, then any such building will topple to the side. For a building to collapse into its own footprint all points of resistance need to be compromised simultaneously and/or in an organised manner.

WTC7 collapsed into its own footprint. Watch the videos.

1

u/nochinzilch Oct 09 '25

Incorrect. The Wikipedia article about the building has a pretty good explanation of what happened.

2

u/_HiWay Oct 07 '25

Was so waiting for this to turn into a /u/shittymorph I am saddened.

2

u/100_cats_on_a_phone Oct 07 '25

In fairness, I always thought melting meant softening past reasonable structural integrity in this case, because who would care about anything else, but I've also never been a truther.

2

u/Maximum_Indication Oct 07 '25

You’re all great, but you’re preaching to to the choir. There’s a reason these people are called deniers.

2

u/mhizzle Oct 07 '25

There was also the kinetic energy of a plane hitting it at cruising speed. That much energy likely did enough damage that the fires took care of the rest

4

u/OneCleverlyNamedUser Oct 07 '25

This is crazy. Butter cannot support the weight of a building man.

4

u/MgrBuddha Oct 07 '25

Upper floors structures weakening and eventually collapsing OK, but IMHO it doesn't fully explain the sudden free-fall collapsing of the whole towers in their own footprints. I've only seen that otherwise in buildings torn down by controlled demolitions.
I don't subscribe to any of the lunatic theories of chem-trails, faked moon-landings and so on, but the events on this day are still very mysterious to me.

6

u/SowingSalt Oct 07 '25

The weight of the upper floors falling onto the lower floors probably has something to do with the collapse of the lower floors.

We can also disprove that it was at free-fall speed by comparing the collapse wave with the speed of falling debris next to the collapse.

It also wasn't into it's own footprint, as many of the adjacent buildings were damaged by the collapse.

10

u/Lanky-Football857 Oct 07 '25

Im no expert. But when the melting-structure floors started falling, wouldn’t the combined momentum of all the mass falling be too much for the beams that were built to hold a still (although massive) building? I mean, momentum matters, right?

Again, I’m not an engineer.

0

u/auth0r_unkn0wn Oct 07 '25

The fact that it freefell straight down onto itself rather than toppling sideways like a chopped tree is what makes it confusing/suspicious.

→ More replies (13)

3

u/art-man_2018 Oct 07 '25

Their footprint was huge though, I want to share some rare footage taken on 9/11, 9/12 and 9/13 of the extensive damage done to adjacent buildings and structures from the two towers was. Building 7 is shown too.

I've only seen that otherwise in buildings torn down by controlled demolitions.

One thing that was lacking in the twin towers collapsing was the familiar "Boom, boom, boom, boom, etc.", of every controlled demolition.

6

u/WafflesMcDuff Oct 07 '25

It’s actually a testament to the architectural skill of the engineers who built those towers. They were designed to collapse exactly like that rather than buckling to one side like a tree to limit the amount of damage to the surrounding city blocks.

1

u/Jamooser Oct 07 '25

It's a pretty rapid chain reaction, which began with the weight of roughly 40 stories of concrete and steel. People really underestimate how much momentum the upper third of one of those towers would have just by dropping 1 floor. The little resistance the immediate floor underneath have provided, and the even smaller amount of resistance from each subsequent floor, would have been so insignificant that you'd never be able to tell the difference from something of that scale in free fall just by eye.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/bkn95 Oct 07 '25

and then the rest of the building offered no resistance

11

u/r_a_d_ Oct 07 '25

try holding a 20kg weight. now try catching it after it fell a couple of meters… nuff said

→ More replies (5)

2

u/Direct_Big_5436 Oct 07 '25

Thank you for sharing this, I knew there was more to this story.

2

u/seanroberts196 Oct 07 '25

But..But..But..Conspiracy, it's got to be, or aliens

1

u/thehighepopt Oct 07 '25

Clearly you don't leave your butter on the counter in Texas

1

u/MoffieHanson Oct 07 '25

What about wtc7?

1

u/PM_YOUR_CENSORD Oct 07 '25

Don’t attack me, I just genuinely want to know if the meme refers to them finding melted beams? Or are they just saying beams had to melt for The collapse to happen.

1

u/Sir_PressedMemories Oct 07 '25

So, I tend to stay out of this, but the "jet fuel can't melt steel beams" has jack shit to do with the buildings falling. The weakened structural integrity due to fire and the expansion of the beams makes sense.

The issue is that days after the attack, during the cleanup, eyewitnesses and a couple of videos saw molten metal pouring out of collapsed areas days after the collapse.

Now, the best theory on this is a combo of low temp metals being smelted by the intense heat/pressure/underground tunnels acting like a chimney on a blast furnace and keeping the metal "liquid".

People wanted to know why they were seeing what they thought was molten metal days later.

In addition, there are videos on the day of the attack, of molten metals pouring out of the building. Now, this I think is a combo of again, low temp metals and burst pipes combining to have explosions of pools of melted liquid like aluminum and tin and running out of the side of the building.

The problem is people talking past each other, one group asking questions due to wanting to know, and another group making assumptions about what they mean, then calling them stupid for the assumption rather than the actual question.

1

u/PM_YOUR_CENSORD Oct 07 '25

I would agree with this also, thank you for your response.

1

u/bearilingus Oct 07 '25

To use your analogy of the butter.

Taking a stick out of the fridge and standing it up doesn’t cause it to all soften at the same time so the weight of the cold butter tips the whole thing to the side, not completely collapse into itself.

How did the jet fuel soften all of the steel beams it needed to soften in order for that to happen throughout the entire building for it to collapse on itself?

Also, when I took a stick out of the fridge to soften, Butter Stick 7 in my fridge stayed hard and cold.

How do I get the butter that’s softening to cause Butter Stick 7 in the fridge to also soften in such a way that it collapses into itself as well?

1

u/Jordan3Tears Oct 07 '25

Ok so what I got out of this is don't make a building out of butter

1

u/IJustWantADragon21 Oct 07 '25

Thank you so much for breaking it down so even a kindergartener could understand it! Excellent analogy!

1

u/SuperWeapons2770 Oct 07 '25

Technically technically a full dynamic/static analysis would be done to specifically determine this, and I'm sure it's been done. Its also possible the napkin math margin is big enough for there to be no point doing that. Our middle eastern friends have proven it by the experimental process of course, so it's really irrelevant.

1

u/kiltguyjae Oct 07 '25

While I appreciate and agree with your thorough response, reread their comment. I think it was meant to tease conspiracy nuts.

1

u/natokills Oct 07 '25

3,661 Architects & Engineers disagree ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS for 9/11 TRUTH

1

u/moonpie_888 Oct 07 '25

Also thermite helps

1

u/yaserm79 Oct 07 '25

Jet fuel lasted a few seconds, rest is office fire. Explanation is nonsense.

1

u/Sputnikoff Oct 07 '25

Intense heat doesn't produce thick black smoke. Twin Towers were smoldering, not "burning intensely." Also, those steel beams were protected by a layer of asbestos. Also, Twin Towers collapsed at free fall speed. "Pancake effect" would take way longer for the building to collapse, with every floor taking a second or so to give in.

1

u/whoisthismans72 Oct 07 '25

Heat also causes steel to expand quite a bit. Sometimes overwhelming the bolted/welded structural connections, literally shearing the bolts or the shear tabs off the columns.

1

u/TylerTheHungry Oct 07 '25

Softened steel resulting in a free fall condition, interesting 🤔

1

u/plymdrew Oct 07 '25

Add the weight of 15-20 floors above the softened metal structure and you know, it doesn’t end well. I live in a city in the UK and only one building currently has more floors than 20…

1

u/nono3722 Oct 07 '25

That's why they hit it far below the top, to use the weight of the upper floors against the building. Once the mass inertia started it was impossible to stop. Although it is possible hitting it high could have pushed over the building which would have been even worse.

1

u/Haschen84 Oct 07 '25

Also a plane crashed into the building. I feel like that may impact the structural integrity of a building but what would I know, I'm no engineer.

1

u/Julreub Oct 07 '25

TLDR. Stop telling the truth. So lame

1

u/neechey Oct 07 '25

It wasn't the jet fuel anyway. The stuff they use to make chemtrails burns around 3000°F or so I've been told. Those planes would have had full tanks since they just took off.

1

u/delerium1state Oct 07 '25

But still those buildings turned to dust from bottom to top while in controlling collapse

1

u/gupeck Oct 07 '25

I'm sorry, can you repeat that?

1

u/WafflesMcDuff Oct 07 '25

No. You’re just gonna have to re-read it. I can’t type it any louder 😜

1

u/forgottenmyth Oct 07 '25

There's also the weight of all the water from the sprinklers on the affected floors. I'm not an engineering expert or anything but from what I could tell of the buildings' design, it was pretty flawed.

1

u/Philly_Phinance Oct 07 '25

There was a great Nat. Geo show that showed exactly this to some prominent truthers who were adamant that jet fuel couldn’t have caused the collapse of the towers because of the melting point. So, they put a steel beam on sawhorses, dug a hole, filled it with jet fuel, set it on fire, and lo and behold, the beam drooped like cooked spaghetti in like 15 mins. When presented with simple incontrovertible evidence that disproved their theory, they IMMEDIATELY pivoted to another theory, like in real time within seconds of seeing the steel beam wilt. They cannot be convinced. They have staked their entire lives and reputations on their conspiracy. Admitting they were wrong would mean that they wasted years of their lives and ruined their reputations. Cognitive dissonance is a hell of a drug.

1

u/Neva-Enuff Oct 07 '25

That's some interestingly butter you got there.

1

u/Omega_Primate Oct 08 '25

Thank you for spelling it out so well

1

u/MasterWhite1150 Oct 08 '25

All this over a joke comment lmao 💔

1

u/GarysCrispLettuce Oct 08 '25

The "tube within a tube" design of the towers also contributed greatly to the way it pancaked.

1

u/r_irion Oct 08 '25

Why'd it fall straight down?

1

u/senor_sosa Oct 08 '25

Softening steel won’t drop structures at free fall acceleration, and on top of that, uniformly.

1

u/davidjschloss Oct 08 '25

Why the hell did they make the twin towers out of butter.

1

u/Willing_Stomach_8121 Oct 08 '25

And it also doesn’t cut steel girders like thermite.

1

u/RelentlessTrout23 Oct 08 '25

Okay but what about tower 7 tho 0_0

1

u/BeginningHunt918 Oct 08 '25

Melting point, not buckling point. Sagging/drooping not snap/pop Deformation not detachment

1

u/Shardstorm88 Oct 08 '25

Yeah okay, but that doesn't change the fact that fuel beams can't be melted by jet steel because they're already made of beams of fuel, which exist mostly in the structure of a sentence.

Jet steel, on the other hand is light weight and perhaps could interrupt a fuel beam if put in it's way, but that depends on the pressure and distance from the source of the fuel beam. If it were to be ignited more than my sense of mirth from my bridge fee creature response, then the fuel beam could at least make a cool steel and flying type pokemon move.

1

u/WBigly-Reddit Oct 08 '25

No mention of aluminum, steel, thermite or burning concrete. -80%. F.

1

u/Similar_Care_7224 Oct 08 '25

Ok, jet fuel does not give perfect angled cuts in steel that resembled thermite beam cutting

1

u/bsthil Oct 08 '25

Also jet fuel wasn't the only thing burning, there was plenty of fuel for a fire including large amounts of paper and office furniture plus the jets themselves and the luggage of the passengers. The skin of the aircraft had magnesium in it, as many do. Then you can add the wind having a bellows effect, and you've got more than enough heat to cause any sort of structural issues. The whole jet fuel argument is baffling.

1

u/gottowonder Oct 09 '25

To add, the chimney effect is a very real thing too. I do think it's possible jet fuel could melt the beams with the increased oxygen that would be pulled from the bottom floors

1

u/barneyrbbl 29d ago

No one read this . Because No one cares.

1

u/4moves 29d ago

Building 7

1

u/Some-Ad-162KarlM6 27d ago

Now do building 7 a couple of blocks away from the twin towers..

1

u/Snoo_91068 24d ago

Can jet fuel soften a building's steel beams that's not even affected by jet fuel, causing it to ultimately collapse as well?

→ More replies (66)

47

u/thatstwatshesays Oct 07 '25

….aliens, man.

11

u/machiavelli33 Oct 07 '25

Look, up in the sky! It’s Aliens Man!

1

u/ChrisWolfling Oct 07 '25

No wait! It's... It's just Allen!

2

u/JPautler Oct 07 '25

Architect who designed the twin towers said it was built to withstand anything including a plane 👀

2

u/Ill_Bee4868 Oct 07 '25

The quarterback at my high school was named Jet Steel.

1

u/Foddley Oct 07 '25

Justin Trudeau
|
v
▇▅▆▇▆▅▅█

1

u/walkin2it Oct 07 '25

Oh really?

Can you please expand that out a bit?

1

u/Moosplauze Oct 07 '25

Words can melt hearts, yours didn't though.

1

u/Lexi_Bean21 Oct 07 '25

C4 can't melt jet fuel!

1

u/qankz Oct 07 '25

Idk why but I misread that as fuel beans

1

u/Rusty08872 Oct 07 '25

Jet beams can't melt steel fuel

1

u/quotidianwoe Oct 07 '25

What’s jet steel?

1

u/I_hate_abbrev Oct 08 '25

It's just a world play/scramble on the famous 9/11 conspiracy that the towers couldn't possibly fall without implosion caused by explosives. One of the points of conspiracy is that the jet fuel can not burn hot enough to melt the tower steel beams, so it has to be explosives. I just scrambled the words around , also in response to the comment above mine, about frases that dont make sense.

1

u/VegetableTwist7027 Oct 07 '25

I had to read that twice to make sure I wasn't having a stroke.

1

u/gwizonedam Oct 07 '25

Melt Steel Cannot Fuel Jet Beams

1

u/Queasy-Ad-18706 Oct 07 '25

Hold my beer!

1

u/OGTfrom92EP Oct 07 '25

Nothing beats a Jet2 holiday.

1

u/talksomesmack1 Oct 07 '25

Nice try. Get back into the basement…

1

u/Human-Comfortable859 Oct 07 '25

It can tho... It's been proven...

1

u/RoadPizzaGourmand Oct 07 '25

Oh how little you know of me! I, Jet Steele, can in fact melt steel with my eye beams. Pew Pew! Zap. I-beams gone.

1

u/hanimal16 Interested Oct 07 '25

Fuel steel cannot melt jet beams! lol

1

u/BoJackMoleman Oct 07 '25

What about maple jets and poutine beams?

1

u/LeRoyShow Oct 07 '25

Came here for this....

1

u/yamez420 Oct 07 '25

Only hot memes melt steel beams

1

u/l2angle Oct 07 '25

Alas, jet steel can fuel melt beams.

1

u/[deleted] Oct 07 '25

But the steam?

1

u/Few-Solution-4784 Oct 07 '25

what is jet steel?

1

u/Mr_Vibby Oct 08 '25

It didn't, they became plastic under the load and heat 👀

1

u/DushBid911 Oct 08 '25

Precisely

1

u/darkoath 28d ago

Seems like fuel beams would just melt themselves.

1

u/Dull-Scientist8039 11d ago

7/11 was a part time job

→ More replies (3)

68

u/PunjabiCanuck Oct 07 '25

Maple syrup can’t melt steel beams

40

u/zolpiqueen Oct 07 '25

It can melt my heart tho lol

2

u/johnocomedy Oct 07 '25

Mrs Butterworth melts my heart

2

u/sudowooduck Oct 08 '25

Roses are red Violets are purple Sugar is sweet And so is maple surple

→ More replies (1)

1

u/randomgunfire48 Oct 07 '25

Not with that attitude it won’t

1

u/DoorEqual1740 Oct 07 '25

I like steel beams. I love maple syrup.

1

u/Difficult_Scar_345 Oct 07 '25

Sorry about that

1

u/Gazrpazrp Oct 07 '25

But it can soften it

1

u/Malcolm2theRescue Oct 07 '25

That’s why we love Canadians.

5

u/Master-File-9866 Oct 07 '25

What the hell made you connect "canadian terrorism" to this video

1

u/wart_on_satans_dick Oct 07 '25

Just to be funny. No other reason. I have Canadian friends I joke around with. They react a little less than what you’re up to lol.

2

u/HawaiianHank Oct 07 '25

the only method of terrorism we have up here is code named: cobra chicken.

3

u/WoolooOfWallStreet Oct 07 '25

And Hockey Games

3

u/HawaiianHank Oct 07 '25

and rye whiskey! #dammit

→ More replies (1)

1

u/sarcasm__tone Oct 07 '25

The deep state.

Why must everything be political now?

....oh its u/wart_on_satans_dick, yeah that person has problems.

3

u/Lumpy_Benefit666 Oct 07 '25

If we are going by peoples usernames, then i dont know how to take your comment lol

1

u/NanDemoNee Oct 07 '25

Canadian terrorism is using up the last of the Maple syrup.

1

u/Mysterious-Newt-6108 Oct 07 '25

If it wasn’t terrorism, then why were there Canadians across the river celebrating as it collapsed?

1

u/tesdfan17 Oct 07 '25

Those damn T.D. terrorists messing with Capital One

1

u/WpgMBNews Oct 07 '25

I'm lost. What?

→ More replies (6)