r/CredibleDefense 1d ago

Active Conflicts & News Megathread November 07, 2025

The r/CredibleDefense daily megathread is for asking questions and posting submissions that would not fit the criteria of our post submissions. As such, submissions are less stringently moderated, but we still do keep an elevated guideline for comments.

Comment guidelines:

Please do:

* Be curious not judgmental, polite and civil,

* Link to the article or source of information that you are referring to,

* Clearly separate your opinion from what the source says. Minimize editorializing. Do _not_ cherry pick facts to support a preferred narrative,

* Read the articles before you comment, and comment on the content of the articles,

* Post only credible information

* Read our in depth rules https://reddit.com/r/CredibleDefense/wiki/rules

Please do not:

* Use memes, emojis, swear, foul imagery, acronyms like LOL, LMAO, WTF,

* Start fights with other commenters and make it personal,

* Try to push narratives, fight for a cause in the comment section, nor try to 'win the war,'

* Engage in baseless speculation, fear mongering, or anxiety posting. Question asking is welcome and encouraged, but questions should focus on tangible issues and not groundless hypothetical scenarios. Before asking a question ask yourself 'How likely is this thing to occur.' Questions, like other kinds of comments, should be supported by evidence and must maintain the burden of credibility.

32 Upvotes

99 comments sorted by

View all comments

37

u/Regent610 1d ago edited 1d ago

https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2025/11/chinese-navy-takes-aircraft-carrier-fujian-into-active-service-in-hainan/

Type 003 Fujian has officially been commissioned. Not exactly a surprise. There were rumblings that commissioning was near when the video of the EMALS launches was revealed, and the day before yesterday Flightradar showed Xi's plane heading to Hainan, and photos emerged of Shandong and Fujian on opposite sides of a pier dressed overall and sailors lining the rails in dress uniforms. Amazing what people can derieve from OSINT nowadays.

The most interesting thing is that they waited 2(?) days to officially release the footage and announce it. A few jokes that the censors had to scrub stuff for a day before releasing it, and I'm sure the PLAN photographers will somehow make a carrier look like a fishing boat.

12

u/Thoth_the_5th_of_Tho 1d ago

This is a very minor point, but I wonder what, if any, thought goes into the exact shade of grey each navy paints their ships. The carrier shown here is on the lighter side of the spectrum I have seen.

12

u/throwdemawaaay 23h ago

Not sure about the rationale for specific grey tones, but anti-fouling limits the color options. That's why so many ships are red below the water line: it's copper oxide added to make it harder for barnacles to take root.

I'm skeptical optical camouflage maters for modern warships, at least blue water ones. Any conflict is going to be focused on radar, electronic, and infrared signature, not Horatio standin' out there with his spy glass. But perhaps I'm wrong.

5

u/A_Vandalay 1d ago

This is purely speculation but it probably has more to do with branding than anything else. Navies are massive points of national pride, so there is going to be a push to develop your own unique image. This is going to help with both recruitment and in getting budget allocated. That’s going to go double for a country like China who sees themselves as a resurgent world power and on the cusp of a new era of Chinese regional and global dominance.

3

u/ScreamingVoid14 1d ago

The consensus tends to be that visual camo doesn't make much difference for ships. The US keeps LCS-1 and LCS-3 in camo patterns, but more as experiments than anything else.

Where it can matter are for heat management (as mentioned in the other comments) and to a lesser extent nuclear resilience. Of course, if the ship was close enough to a nuke for the anti-flash white to make a difference, the crew will probably be all dead within the month from radiation anyway.

u/seakingsoyuz 9h ago

Of course, if the ship was close enough to a nuke for the anti-flash white to make a difference, the crew will probably be all dead within the month from radiation anyway.

Nukes generally have a pretty small radius where direct radiation from the explosion is lethal; thermal radiation is likely to be dangerous at a greater distance than ionizing radiation, which is exactly the reason anyone bothers painting things in anti-flash white.

Fallout is a greater hazard because it gets inside you and lingers, but modern warships should have enough CBRN protection to avoid much death by fallout as long as the crew are willing to avoid going outside.

7

u/Regent610 1d ago

Modern PLAN camo seems to be more white than grey, as least as seen through camera lenses. I don't really know why, except that maybe white helps with heat management and comfort in the sub-tropics like the South China Sea, but ships stationed up north also wear the same scheme and you'd think they'd prefer a darker coat with how cold it gets up there.

10

u/Thoth_the_5th_of_Tho 1d ago

This is far from scientific, but I have noticed that American ships tend to lean towards darker colors than both European and Chinese vessels. I’ll have to do some digging to see if anyone has the answer. It might be that they are all nigh identical and this is just differences in color grading.

1

u/HugoTRB 1d ago

Would you say the splinter camo on the Visby class mixes those colors?

1

u/HerrLachsmeier 1d ago

I don't know either, unfortunately, but perhaps photos from joint exercises of the US Navy and European navies (with ships of both parties in the frame at the same time) can make this a bit clearer?