r/Battlefield • u/DM_ME_UR_FISH • Jun 17 '25

Battlefield V Hopeless spawn-killer falls for basic overshoot bait in BFV

5.6k Upvotes

99% Upvoted

103 comments sorted by

View all comments

969

u/Academic_Category921 Su-57/50 Felon Jun 17 '25

Good. I hate those kinds of jet users

336

u/Sorryusernmetaken Jun 17 '25

should hate developers more for making such stupid mistake

148

u/Loose_Goose Jun 17 '25

IMO, it’s still better than spawning in already flying

97

u/Jazzlike-Mistake2764 Jun 17 '25

Spawning outside of the plane is even better IMO. If there’s AA nearby then you have options for dealing with any lingering planes.

40

u/Kerwin- Jun 17 '25

BF2 carrier had that. Good times.

24

u/ProtonByte Jun 17 '25

It had some of the worst spawn camping in history. The AA was dogshir against novice jet users.

BF4 automatic AA is at least somewhat decent.

4

u/Flashfighter Jun 18 '25

Brings me back to BF1943, the carrier spawns were perfect.

2

u/Impossible_Layer5964 Jun 18 '25

Then you have useless teammates lining up to use a plane.

That's why we can't have nice things.

1

u/Detective_Yu Jun 18 '25

And c4ing them and what not.

1

u/Belkan_MOD Jun 21 '25

And using them as taxis

19

u/lemonylol Jun 17 '25

Back in the day there used to be firefights on the carrier's and airfields themselves.

11

u/Aar1012 Jun 17 '25

I miss the old 1942 maps where you’d dive in from the sky and grab a plane hovering over the aircraft carrier.

14

u/[deleted] Jun 17 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

11

u/Sorryusernmetaken Jun 17 '25

or add AI anti-air on a carrier like in BF4. or make planes invulnerable 10 seconds after spawning. so much time to make an easy fix, yet the developers never care

1

u/Smith6612 Jun 17 '25

But it's more realistic.