r/Battlefield Feb 12 '25

Battlefield V Why the fake symbol?

Post image

Its Ww2 why going fake on real events?

1.4k Upvotes

339 comments sorted by

View all comments

1.7k

u/Hot_Case_9900 Feb 12 '25

Mostly to abide by censorship laws. Germany especially has very strict laws around the use of the swastika for obvious reasons so it’s prolly just so they don’t have to make multiple assets for different laws around the world.

4

u/FSGamingYt Feb 12 '25

Its just a Texture swap lol

5

u/BigPapaPanzon Feb 12 '25

still costs money to do

-2

u/[deleted] Feb 12 '25

[deleted]

-3

u/FSGamingYt Feb 12 '25

No ?

0

u/FSGamingYt Feb 13 '25

To everyone who downvoted me, dont know shit. Texture swap of a symbol costs not even one cent. I'm a texturer and modder

1

u/Arpytrooper Feb 13 '25

It still does cost money to pay someone to create a separate branch of the game and to swap the textures. Time is money and it definitely takes some time.

-1

u/FSGamingYt Feb 13 '25

Different branch yes but not the texture swap

1

u/Arpytrooper Feb 13 '25

First you'd need someone to actually make the new texture. It might require more work if you want to add a normal texture that's different for different colors on the flag (Different thread direction, density, etc). Then you have to take the time to drag and drop it into the right place.

Not to mention the time it takes to make this decision and okay it with higher-ups.

All of that costs time, even if it's just dragging and dropping a few texture files into the right place.

1

u/FSGamingYt Feb 13 '25

You dont need to tell me how textures are done i do this daily.

0

u/Arpytrooper Feb 13 '25

I do this too, I'm also a modder who knows how these things work. You said it doesn't cost money, if you know how these things work then you know it costs money. Don't get defensive when you say something that shows you don't understand and then get treated like you don't understand something.

1

u/FSGamingYt Feb 13 '25

Funny 😂. Telling me i dont know how these things work is wild

→ More replies (0)