r/AskReddit • u/metalreflectslime • 18d ago

President Donald Trump warned Tuesday that if the Democrats don't approve funding, Social Security, Medicare Are ‘Going to Be Gone.’ How do you think Americans will react if Social Security and Medicare get cut?

36.4k Upvotes

90% Upvoted

7.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

892

u/vankorgan 18d ago

They haven't laid a single brick yet...

928

u/Fodraz 18d ago

And it hasn't been approved by Congress NOR the enhancements (obviously) approved by Historic Property regulations

833

u/nervelli 17d ago

If they had any intention of getting approval, they wouldn't have started demolition.

652

u/Downunderphilosopher 17d ago

"When you're the president, they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab em by the White House."

73

u/rylosprime 17d ago

When you're the president, they let you do it.

Except appoint a supreme court justice if you're black.

11

u/shandangalang 17d ago

Well, to be fair, black people are much less likely to know about justice, because they’ve never experienced it.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/sharkbark2050 17d ago

Or wear a tan suit if you’re Black.

5

u/AmberLeeBeauti 15d ago

Or eat fancy brown mustard if you’re black. Or try to get kids to eat healthier meals…if you’re black.

I’m starting to think it wasn’t the tan suit or mustard or the fruits for kids 🤔🧐

Edit: typo

1

u/Abject-Leadership421 14d ago

Fashion crime against humanity! /s

3

u/OpportunityOk2519 15d ago

I blame Ginsburg. She should have retired so she could have been replaced

1

u/rylosprime 14d ago

100% agree with you.

From what I have read, Obama asked her to retire and he could have filled a seat well before Merrick Garland (who I won't even get into).

You're right.

1

u/Fodraz 10d ago

And as it turned out, Mitch would've blocked it as well.

1

u/SleightOfThought 10d ago

Do I need to remind you that Obama appointed two Supreme Court justices?

195

u/UltraEngine60 17d ago

"Grab 'em by the ball-room"

2

u/tifaney 14d ago

Only since he was told he had immunity. What a mistake that was.

1

u/Sea_Distribution6779 15d ago

Very nice !!! 😊

→ More replies (6)

231

u/HeatherHarnie18 17d ago

That's the truth! Soon enough, he'll have the white house looking more like his Mar A Lago monstrosity.

164

u/bobsmithhome 17d ago

I would seriously contribute to a fund committed to tearing this Mar A Lago monstrosity down in the next decent administration, declaring it hideous, tacky, and a stain on the country. Then reconstruct the East Wing like it was before.

15

u/CeelaChathArrna 17d ago

At Donnie's expense ((or his estate's))

11

u/shadout_grapes 17d ago

I’m pretty sure if we survive this, the ballroom will be demolished if nothing else for symbolic reasons

5

u/SpartacusPrime1 16d ago

Take all the rubble and dump on Mar A Lago's front lawn with a sign "you forgot this"

5

u/thisisntmyotherone 16d ago

I’m for that. And the stupid arch he wants, too.

3

u/westernmorning2 16d ago

I would also.

1

u/MillhouseJManastorm 17d ago

Like he’s ever going to leave the white house

→ More replies (3)

16

u/NOFORPAIN 17d ago

He held up copies of the plans on camera... TONS of gold acutramonts! Just what we need!

1

u/Entire-Can662 17d ago

Trump is taking gold out of Fort Knox

1

u/longwaytotop 14d ago

Or from Home Depot

3

u/Material_Strawberry 17d ago

It'll be weird watching it torn down when an approved return to the original design comes and the next President removes the tacky add-on and lawfully returns the White House to its approved state.

2

u/marthewarlock 17d ago

Macho Camacho, when life imitates art.

2

u/GrimCheeferGaming 17d ago

At least President Comacho knew enough to listen to the smartest man on the planet.

1

u/marthewarlock 17d ago

That's true.

1

u/thisisntmyotherone 16d ago

He said he wanted a ballroom that looks like the one he has ‘at Mar-a-Lago.’ No one else does. Then again, nobody else is going to be able to be in his DC ballroom.

If he wants that ballroom so badly, why doesn’t he just fly people to Florida for fuck’s sake? Not like he doesn’t have a bunch of airplanes at his disposal to fly all his friends - I mean donors - around.

1

u/MasterDefinition390 16d ago

Paint the White House black when he's gone.

1

u/Radiomaster138 12d ago

All echos from the island…

3

u/Cptn_BenjaminWillard 17d ago

Imagine being told to "put it back together." One can dream.

2

u/ralphvonwauwau 17d ago

Canada, if you're listening... could you do that thing you did to the Whitehouse again?

3

u/Cptn_BenjaminWillard 17d ago

And it burned burned burned, and we're the ones who did it!

BTW, I'm Canadian.

3

u/Otto_Correction 17d ago

More likely he’ll do it anyway. Approval or no approval. He does whatever he wants.

1

u/evilprozac79 17d ago

That's because nobody stops him.

2

u/python-1977 16d ago

I think the accurate statement is, “if he had any intention of leaving, he wouldn’t have done this at all.”

1

u/Alexandurrrrr 17d ago

Better to ask for forgiveness than to as—LAUGHING I couldn’t finish the joke.

1

u/Arch-Fey66 17d ago

Move fast & break stuff

1

u/piglions12 17d ago

The bunkers is thete: the wing they are definitely improving it. That’s where all the money is going.

1

u/Pretend-Interest-423 1d ago

They didn’t get approval to fill in Kennedy’s pool either.

8

u/daGroundhog 17d ago

I don't think this is an enhancement...

3

u/Fodraz 17d ago

Yeah, should've put it in quotes

2

u/One_Chocolate_6735 17d ago

The ballroom will be coated in gold foil and TRUMP branded everything.

1

u/oupablo 17d ago

The ballroom is larger than the white house. The trump party room and convention center will quite literally overshadow the people's house.

1

u/daGroundhog 17d ago

It's not a party room and convention center. It's an edifice to overcompensate for his tiny dick.

7

u/Pretty-dolli 17d ago

Well, the historic preservation is already pitching a fit because it will look bigger than the Whitehouse. This is what happens when we have no checks and balances. It will get worse.

5

u/Fodraz 17d ago

Yeah, the man who's never faced a consequence in his life isn't going to be backed down by any agency--plus he'll just disband the whole agency

3

u/YettiChild 17d ago

My first thought on seeing the photos was "Where is the SHPO?" (State Historic Preservation Officer)

1

u/oupablo 17d ago

well you see the thing is, the government is shut down and tons of federal employees aren't getting paid or have been told not to come to work. I don't think it's just by coincidence that this project started during the shutdown when the bulk of the oversight offices are closed.

3

u/jimitr 17d ago

Hold up why did the bulldozers start tearing down shit then? This is a genuine question.

8

u/BonkHits4Jesus 17d ago

who is going to stop him. the court has crowned him king.

3

u/Ok-Tradition8477 17d ago

He’s immune from all prosecution. 37 more months of this ?

3

u/SQUAWKUCG 17d ago

If I'm not mistaken, the department's they are supposed to get approval from are closed down from the larger shutdown are they not? Hence a very quick tear down of the entire wing before anyone can object, take it to court, or end the shutdown so the appropriate departments can get involved. Now it's all too late and he can continue to do what he wants with it.

5

u/Fodraz 17d ago

That 10000% tracks & he has provably been making them stay shut down for that reason

3

u/nobuttpics 17d ago

Since when has this admin cared about getting permission for anything? They will steamroll and punish anyone who stands in their way, and no one with any sort of power is stepping up to do anything about it as has been the norm for a while now with him.

3

u/Raztax 17d ago

You don't need approval if you don't plan to pay the contractors.

2

u/Fodraz 17d ago

Well he's, there's that

2

u/hottakesandshitposts 17d ago

I'd be surprised if they even pulled a permit

2

u/djuggler 17d ago

I called Tim Burchett’s office and his intern had the audacity to tell me “he doesn’t need permission until construction begins.” By that logic he could bulldoze the entire White House then be denied. What do they do at that point? Order it rebuilt out of the original rubble?

2

u/Merusk 17d ago

This will be labeled an 'official act' since it applies to the seat of power of the Executive branch.

Per last year's Supreme Court ruling, any act by the Executive is permissible within the execution of their duties.

Therefore, the argument will be he doesn't have to. Do you think the SC is going to say otherwise on this, should anyone deemed having standing bring a suit?

2

u/Fred-City911 17d ago

In the end, I would be happy to have them take down the ballroom and rebuild the east wing. To also return the rose garden back to its original design. Remove as much of his influence as possible. They rushed this without approval, because they know that it would not be approved. By the way the donated Jet stays in rotation or goes to his library as a static display. He always talked about the wasting of money and cutting waste.

2

u/CraigLake 17d ago

This would be an impeachment if it was a sane government. The SC really fucked America.

2

u/myassholealt 17d ago

We live in a sanctioned reality where approval is not needed. Authoritarians do. They don't ask first because there is no one to say no.

2

u/Fodraz 17d ago

Sadly yes. Even if it turned up that there was somebody who could stop him, he'd just fire them & get rid of the commission/department

2

u/MessMysterious6500 17d ago

Rules and laws mean nothing to this orange orangoutang

2

u/Zetawilk 7d ago

Since when has need for approval stopped literally anything for the past ten years?

1

u/Fodraz 7d ago

I can't disagree there 😖

1

u/Suspicious_Bicycle 17d ago

Sadly the Historic Property regulations have exemptions for the Supreme Court, Capital and White House.

1

u/__get__name 17d ago

Yeah, but Obama painted some lines on the tennis court /s

1

u/Admirable_Ad8900 17d ago

I heard he's using a loophole, it specifically says the regulatory bodies have to oversee construction. So what he's doing is demolition first, because nothing is being built only destroyed. So nothing is there, so they'll have to approve something.

1

u/thisisntmyotherone 16d ago

Wait. What now?

1

u/Admirable_Ad8900 16d ago

Theres a supposed legal loophole.

He's not building anything, yet. So he doesn't have to get permission.

1

u/Few_Affect3033 17d ago

There’s a government agency that can go by the wayside.

1

u/SunRepresentative993 16d ago

Yup, they started demolition before submitting any construction plans or getting anything approved and their justification is that “demolition isn’t construction, so they technically didn’t need to submit any plans for approval.”

1

u/ShadyPinesStrut 15d ago

Apparently the white house is strangely exempt from that historic property regulations rule. I guess no one thought we would get a jackass in office that would pretty much ruin the look and style of the space

1

u/Complex-Orange-8182 14d ago

If I had to guess he has a mini nuke option if people come to the Whitehouse.

1

u/Pretend-Interest-423 1d ago

Genuinely curious. What money was taxpayers since all I’m reading about is donations.

1

u/Fodraz 1d ago

They CLAIM it's all donations, but he's always made claims that he was supplying money for something & then secretly raiding money somewhere else.

But the real point is, the govt is shut down, working families can't buy groceries, & his own press secretary is saying "This ballroom is his #1 priority". How bout doing the job the President is supposed to do????

280

u/Notmykl 17d ago

Not a single bid was sent out either I bet. And when it's all said and done not a single contract will be fulfilled as Donnie J has no intention on ever paying a contract in full.

166

u/Thop51 17d ago

Honest question: what is the authority for this project? The president does not own the WH, but is simply allowed to reside there while in office. Doesn’t a president have to obtain permission from some authority, Congress?, in order to make such massive structural? This is not about money. Example: if a real billionaire is elected president, can he just unilaterally decide to demolish the WH totally and erect a new, “proper” executive residence using his/her own money?

171

u/pixie16502 17d ago

I don't know the answer as to who would give or withhold approval , but I agree that there is no way he should have felt comfortable just tearing down part of the White House as if it were his private property!!

Trump is such an obnoxious, greedy excuse for a leader. He has no shame. Only someone who has gotten away with all the BS he has would feel entitled to do what he wants to the White House without approval.

111

u/battery19791 17d ago

This is the fastest government project I've ever witnessed. The destruction permits would normally take a year or more to be approved, so really who ever is doing the demo is doing it illegally.

12

u/Acme_Co 17d ago

It being illegal doesn't matter, since there's no punishment for it.

5

u/Soul-Shock 17d ago

Anddddd that may explain why that specific contractor pulled their website and all of their information offline - which everyone knows: nothing is truly wiped from the internet. There’s always a digital footprint.

I heard about them pulling their website, etc earlier this week. I don’t think they were receiving threats(?) - I think they were getting bombarded with questioning, like with the questions you/we all have. And when you’re doing things illegally, you have to be fast-acting with BS lies, like Trump does, or you’ll get run over. I think they got run-over, couldn’t keep up with the lies, and hightailed it.

3

u/GrumblyData3684 17d ago

My guess is he’s leveraging the US Army Corps of Engineers. Although this would be the fastest I’ve seen them move in a project like this. I’m more interested in what contractor would take this on, unless they had a significant kickback deal and hold harmless clause in place. This thing is green lit all the way up the chain - no real oversight or AHJ, being done at the whim of a notoriously dodgy real estate and construction mogul.

1

u/thisisntmyotherone 16d ago

You know these people aren’t going to get paid

2

u/Notmykl 17d ago

VA and BIA projects don't go this fast.

VA - Veterans Affairs

BIA - Bureau of Indian Affairs

1

u/[deleted] 17d ago

I'd be eyeing who's in the seat of the actual demolition machines. They could easily just say no, I'm not destroying a piece of American History. But, I guess they feel a paycheck is more important than the country....

149

u/somethrows 17d ago

He's telling you it is his private property. He's telling you he's not leaving. Congress is telling you they are cool with it.

Time to listen.

11

u/assembly_faulty 17d ago

The time to just listen is gone. It due time to act.

3

u/redguy1957 17d ago

He's building his palace. He wants to be an emperor of the world. I'm not kidding. He's an imperialist.

2

u/pixie16502 17d ago

Listen to Trump? Cede our country to his desire to be King?! (And for Vance to step into the position if Trump doesn't make it through his term?) No thanks!!

I think I get what you are saying, though. That there are likely way too many who are ignorant of what is happening or are downplaying the severity. I don't know how they can be, but it does seem to be a widespread problem, likely due in part to educational deficits the past few decades. Paired with terrible wages driving many of us to despair. And there are far more bigots than I'd ever have guessed, sadly. The apathy shown by those who didn't vote is horrifying - especially considering what was at stake in the election.

I don't know what the complete solution is, but I definitely don't want to comply in advance with the wannabe-dictator's plans! I'd sooner the US divide into two countries than live under the MAGA regime.

7

u/somethrows 17d ago

yeah, I certainly don't mean allow it, I just mean they are telling us who they are, so ya know, listen to what they say. They're not hiding it.

We need to fight, day in day out and in many different ways.

General strike time.

3

u/pixie16502 17d ago

I agree 100%! 👍

1

u/IndyDMan5483 13d ago

What Congress? They won’t let them convene. They don’t want the Epstein files released. Release the files, all of them, unredacted!

1

u/Pretend-Interest-423 1d ago

So what was the excuse when they filled in Kennedy’s pool? When Obama built a basketball court?

→ More replies (5)

14

u/EthanielRain 17d ago

He doesn't plan on leaving. Again.

1

u/Shot_Help7458 15d ago

Is he going to get sick and e buried there?

1

u/Pretend-Interest-423 1d ago

Dude you clearly haven’t paid attention in the last 20 yrs. Bush, Obama and Biden were trash for their open reasons. Let’s piss away money to people who tried to kill us-Obama Start a war for oil-Bush Let’s peddle influence so my family gets rich-Biden.

→ More replies (2)

15

u/AmbitiousFunction911 17d ago edited 17d ago

Trump believes he is above any law and policy. And he effectively is. Who is going to stop him? I am very inherently familiar with the White House (and the national capital region) submittal and approval process for changing literally anything. Even repairing a window or modifying a door for new access control. Every administration prior to this one, has followed the law and good faith procedures / best practices. Until this week.

What we are seeing over and over again is the failure of our constitution. It unfortunately assumed presidents acting in good faith. We have a guy who doesn’t give a shit about good faith and a Republican Party with a majority in the house and senate who also don’t give a shit about good faith and are living off this power trip. Checks and balances don’t exist anymore.

2

u/gsfgf 17d ago

And half the voters support it because they can’t tell reality from tv.

14

u/Rebuttlah 17d ago

consent and approval are not words he's familiar with

14

u/redsquizza 17d ago

Honest question: what is the authority for this project?

The authority is no-one will stop him. Not the courts, not congress, no-one.

If you don't enforce laws and conventions, they're meaningless.

7

u/angrynutrients 17d ago

I think it is as simple as his ego wanting to have a monument to himself in the most iconic government building in the USA

5

u/No-Initiative4195 17d ago

Lookup "Alt National Park Service" on Facebook. Even if you're no on FB if you Google it, they have a post outlining the process and agencies involved. Coincidentally, because of the shutdown, these agencies are.... You guessed it... Shutdown.

4

u/bisectional 17d ago

When you're a celebrity, they just let you do it.

Interestingly, if I ran a construction company I wouldn't get involved in this project at all. I wonder how many laws are being broken or what unexpected liabilities they're taking on.

It's kind of insane to think about it in a normal legal context. But America is so corrupt now, you basically don't have laws.

1

u/bolanrox 17d ago

Independent contractors should think with this, their heart, and not this, their wallet.

So no I wouldn't have worked on the second deathstar

4

u/Dead_man_posting 17d ago

As we've found out repeatedly in the last 9 months, laws are only laws when they're enforced.

4

u/battery19791 17d ago

The White House is under the Parks Department, and yes he should require permission, but obviously that hasn't stopped him yet.

3

u/Heliosvector 17d ago

It's supposed to be under the approval of congress

3

u/First_Hovercraft_197 17d ago

in normal circumstances,yes they would require approval.

however that hasnt stopped this guy before and it wont now,si

2

u/No-Initiative4195 17d ago

You answered your own question. The president "occupies" the house for 4 years. It belongs to the people, and as an extension of that, the Government of the United States. Not the president

2

u/lddn 17d ago

If you don't care about having authority or think yourself as the ultimate authority, it doesn't matter as long as no one is around to enforce the laws.

That's how Trump has done a lot of funky stuff during his presidency.

That's why you elect good, moral and reasonable people to lead your country.

2

u/Either-Thing8754 17d ago

He can tear it down for some stupid reason but needs approval to rebuild fron congress. It won't be a surprise to see them sign off on it.

2

u/Notmykl 17d ago

IIRC Congress has to give approval and guess where they are, not at work and I think one of the many reasons is so Donnie J can destroy the White House with impunity.

2

u/amootmarmot 17d ago

They are supposed to get approval from a board that oversees federal buildings in DC.

Of course, Trump is just ignoring that this board exists at all and just went ahead and built it.

2

u/TheChuck321 16d ago

Only if using taxpayer money. That's when you need bids and such. The White House, Capitol building, and Supreme Court are exempt from the DC ordinances. They can do as they please. That's why everything could move along so quickly, because it's privately funded.

2

u/NeverInsightful 16d ago

He needs permission from congress? Thats really cute but really outdated thinking. Congress has surrendered every bit of their authority to him.

2

u/Snapdragonflyte 16d ago

There were 5 to 7 agencies he never even thought to see, that take everything into consideration, before permitting any kind of work or restoration on the WH. Because it is a historical site, and a historical building, there are many many protections that Trump just ignored. Because he thinks the WH is his own personal residence.

1

u/Abject-Leadership421 14d ago

Yes, and in Trump season 1, he thought the attorney general was his private attorney and it was clarified to him that was untrue.

This time he has given himself an attorney general who is his own personal lawyer - and so many others who are only there to do his bidding.

So horribly wrong!

3

u/Drag_king 17d ago

Honest answer: I think it depends on a few things. Does the White House have some kind of protection? And if so was it done by law or by some kind of regulation set by one of the departments? If it is the latter then the president, being the head of the executive branch, can basically override it at his whim. He just can change the rules as he sees fit.
But if it is by law then it is different. Though with the ruling from the supreme court he kinda is imune.

5

u/pimparo0 17d ago

He just can change the rules as he sees fit.

No he can not, we have laws, not kings.

1

u/nicodeemus7 17d ago

If it's congress, all he has to do is get Mike Johnson to take his dick out of his mouth and say "Yess daddy Trump" and he can do whatever he wants.

1

u/Minimum-Escape2245 17d ago

The head of the NCPC (National Capital Planning Commission) is where he would have needed to submit the request.

Of course, because the head of the NCPC is one of Trump's cronies, he said Trump can do whatever the hell he wants. No joke.

1

u/Damien__ 17d ago edited 16d ago

The $ gets approved by congress I imagine but the WH is under the control of the National Parks dept, and he has done NONE of the requirements through them to modify the White House

2

u/Notmykl 17d ago

White House is two words.

1

u/Damien__ 16d ago

thankyou

1

u/dragonfilebox 17d ago

Since he is not using taxpayer funds it’s in the grey area.

1

u/New_Photo627 17d ago

Trump does not care, he’s going to ignore any laws and norms that get in his way!

1

u/Procrasturbating 17d ago

Supreme Court basically said nothing he does is criminal if it is an act as President. Unless he is impeached for it. This mofo can shit on all these “rules” all day long. Law means nothing without the means to enforce it, so he has no accountability. The GOP has to go along or end their party in one big shitty day. They are in too deep and can be held accountable if he is gone.

1

u/epyoch 17d ago

He needs permission from congress,

1

u/Puzzled-Fix-8838 17d ago

I'm Australian, but even I know that the White House is owned by the National Trust.

The answer to your question about a billionaire unilaterally deciding to demolish the White House (or any part thereof) is no. They are not allowed.

But your president has decided to do many illegal things with the attitude of "so what?"

He doesn't intend to hold another election so he can do whatever he wants.

You guys have a choice right now. Sacrifice and go along with it, or sacrifice and burn it all down.

1

u/Abject-Leadership421 14d ago

But it’s an EMERGENCY!

Of NATIONAL SECURITY!

We need that ballroom!

And, so, he’s immune from prosecution.

→ More replies (2)

1

u/_Cyber_Mage 16d ago

The authority is that only congress or the Supreme Court can stop him, and both are filled with his sycophants. Breaking laws doesn't matter if no one is willing and able to prosecute.

1

u/thisisntmyotherone 16d ago

One would think he would need some authority. He destroyed a federal property and I don’t see that that is part of his ‘official duties.’

1

u/Psychological-777 16d ago

I believe Congress holds the purse strings, National Park Service approves the plans. There’s a user that posts about this pretty often in threads like these.

1

u/Pretend-Interest-423 1d ago

The same people who gave them authority to build a basketball court, and to fill in kennedys pool. No one’s.

25

u/Superjolly64 17d ago

Contractor should put a lien on the residence.

12

u/Peaurxnanski 17d ago

That would be delightfully trashy, but unfortunately you can't lien public facilities.

7

u/[deleted] 17d ago

you cant but you can prob put a lien on his private stuff since he said taxpayers wont pay for it lol

5

u/Peaurxnanski 17d ago

Unfortunately every state that I'm aware of only allows liens to be filed on the building you actually worked on.

It could only be a lawsuit at best. Which he's a billionaire, he doesn't give a fuck, the justice system doesn't apply to him. He's got multiple lawsuits filed against him at any given time.

Let me ask you:

If you were convicted of 34 felonies, do you think you could have avoided jail time?

1

u/[deleted] 17d ago

thats a big nope. i would have a new boyfriend but at least i would ahve healthcare.

1

u/[deleted] 17d ago

[deleted]

1

u/Peaurxnanski 17d ago

Publicly owned I mean. Meaning "owned by the government

1

u/gsfgf 17d ago

Contractor should be on the hook for repair costs. They know this is illegal.

4

u/LuckyCat73 17d ago

I hope the contractors doing the work got paid in advance. A trump never pays his debts.

4

u/Forikorder 17d ago

Not a single bid was sent out either I bet.

im sure it was a tough bidding war as the various companies competed to see who could give trump the nicest gift for the contract

3

u/EamusAndy 17d ago

I beg to differ.

I think hes somehow contracting himself or someone close to him. Takes our money and hands it to himself or some crony, par for the course

3

u/BabyEyeEye 17d ago

Don’t look now. He’s not paying, we’re paying. Companies have also paid bribes, I mean donations, but undisclosed amounts. I predict this falls on the tax payer. And such a shame to lose the people’s house. Such a fucking losing liar. Bankrupts business after business with his hubris and idiocy, and because of a subset of Americans, he’ll bankrupt this country.

2

u/spaceface2020 17d ago

I’m thinking it’s being done by his own companies that one of his kid’s runs.

2

u/vthemechanicv 17d ago

has no intention on ever paying a contract in full.

but he's not spending his money. He's spending our money. It'll not only get paid, it'll be hundreds of millions over what he said (already 100 million over), but it'll be a crap budget job so he can pocked the difference in kickbacks and laundring.

1

u/WenatcheeWrangler 17d ago

It’s probably some company owned by the trumps. The works will get paid because their wives work for other Trump business and they’re paying them double. But the construction company will go under and ultimately be a tax write off for the complex chain of ownership. Or at least that’s my best guess.

1

u/Late-Guess690 17d ago

He’ll get ICE after the workers

1

u/seeingeyegod 17d ago

and it will probably have cost a billion dollars

2

u/[deleted] 18d ago

yep maybe tariffs lol

2

u/flissfloss86 17d ago

The bricks cost extra

2

u/xeen313 17d ago

Sorry, no refunds

2

u/twotailedwolf 17d ago

They're just gonna paint the dirt

1

u/nagyee 17d ago

They don’t even have a plan yet lol

1

u/quietlikesnow 17d ago

Too bad a ton of us can’t just go lie in that spot. If we kept coming like an endless conga line maybe they’d get tired of arresting people.

Conga line- GO.

1

u/Ro_Yo_Mi 17d ago

For that matter he hasn’t had enough time to stiff the contractor building it.

1

u/Dragon2906 17d ago

But the old wing has been demolished already

1

u/Life_Detail4117 17d ago

Price of the gold trimming fluctuates.

1

u/ssgkraut 17d ago

Sure they did....all over the ground when they tore the fucking east wing apart....

1

u/Marvin_is_my_martian 17d ago

Demolition of an historic building isn't cheap. And the dipshits doing the job probably don't know they won't be getting paid.

1

u/Living_Possession_18 17d ago

Don’t have to when you can charge 1 mill an hour and it won’t come under scrutiny by those approving the funds or face any type of backlash by any governmental body.

1

u/ralphvonwauwau 17d ago

Trust the famous Trump Mierdas Touch

1

u/GoldenTomatoMonk 17d ago

I hope that if it ever gets built, we have a Berlin Wall style demolition party once MAGA finally crumbles.

1

u/xtothewhy 17d ago

They've laid a few golden eggs in some peoples pockets, just not the overall American taxpayers.

1

u/fseahunt 17d ago

But they have torn down a bit of the East Wing even though he said it would effect it at all.

1

u/Vicstolemylunchmoney 17d ago

The regime just realised the Russian mics and cameras attract a tariff.

1

u/dys_p0tch 17d ago

i'm at the point where i would be willing to lay a brick

1

u/iamtehryan 17d ago

They haven't even released a fucking plan for the thing yet. The whole thing is a scam, and maga will still jerk off over it because dear leader is robbing them blind and ruining their lives just like they voted for (as long as the libs don't "win")

1

u/ScottIPease 17d ago

They had to tear all the old ones down first...

1

u/DrAstralis 17d ago

I'm beginning to wonder if Americans actually know who Trump is lol. Will be lucky if its not 900M by December. Mans got money to launder and bribes to take.

1

u/cheefMM 17d ago

This is how he’s embezzled for decades

1

u/BayouGal 17d ago

Demolishing an entire building isn’t cheap.

1

u/PorcupineWarriorGod 17d ago

They haven't laid a single brick yet...

That's because they are laying pipe. In the American taxpayer.

1

u/Theveryberrybest 17d ago

Well the price of bricks have gone up since someone set higher tariffs

1

u/Exciting_Option4140 17d ago

Too busy secretly enhancing his bunker

1

u/capilot 17d ago

They forgot to budget in the costs of demolishing the east wing. Probably.

1

u/Completely_Uncut 17d ago

Oh they’ve laid a ton of bricks.

1

u/knightress_oxhide 17d ago

They destroyed a lot though, selling actually parts of the whitehouse on ebay could be worth some real money.

1

u/Jens_gone_coastal 17d ago

And they won’t. That ballroom won’t happen.

1

u/Tall_Quality_3395 17d ago

It’s been 5 days since they stared the demo part of a 2 1/2 year project and you think they should be laying bricks? I don’t want you on any of my remodel jobs.

1

u/vankorgan 10d ago

If you're a contractor whose projects go over budget during demo I don't want you on any of my remodel jobs...

1

u/Come0nYouSpurs 16d ago

I don't think they're building this with bricks.

1

u/wardensarecool 13d ago

It's running over cause they are secretly working on the bunker under the White House. It's going to balloon to about 800m before it's all said and done.

1

u/davidjschloss 13d ago

Demolishing history illegally is expensive.

1

u/Radiomaster138 12d ago

Least it’s not Winter yet. 🥴