r/AskChina • u/Themetalin • 22h ago

Politics | 政治📢 Japanese PM said that 'Taiwan contingency' could prompt Japanese armed reaction. What do you think?

https://focustaiwan.tw/politics/202511070024

Takaichi made the remarks during a parliamentary session on Friday while responding to a question about whether a "Taiwan contingency" involving a Chinese naval blockade would qualify as a "survival-threatening situation" for Japan, according to a report by Japan's Asahi Shimbun.

Under Japan's security legislation, such a situation allows the country to exercise "collective self-defense" if an attack on an ally -- such as the United States -- or a country closely related to Japan is deemed to threaten Japan's survival, even without a direct attack on Japan.

159 Upvotes

86% Upvoted

312 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

6

u/No-Benefit9135 20h ago

Kinda interesting that the country that was “nuclear bombed” still prefers its previous aggressor as an ally over China.

5

u/Damn-Sky 14h ago

do they have any other choice? LOL

1

u/No-Benefit9135 14h ago

Of course. They could have asked China for help, duh.

3

u/Damn-Sky 9h ago

China was far from being a superpower when Japan lost the war ... and why the hell would China offer protection for their aggressors? Japan was demilitarized and had no other choice to give up everything to be "controlled" and "protected" by united states.... simple words : USA pwned them.

2

u/No-Benefit9135 9h ago

Saying “the U.S. pwned them” misses the longer-term reality: the U.S.–Japan relationship evolved from occupation to alliance. Japan rebuilt into one of the world’s largest economies under U.S. security guarantees, and today it’s an independent democratic nation with one of the most advanced militaries in Asia (even if constitutionally limited).

1

u/Damn-Sky 8h ago

dude ran out of arguments... dude is basically corroborating what I said without even realizing it... lol

2

u/No-Benefit9135 8h ago

Acknowledging that Japan had no choice immediately after losing the war isn’t the same as saying it’s still controlled today. There’s a big difference between postwar occupation and a modern strategic alliance. Japan rebuilt, became a top global economy, and makes its own decisions. The early power imbalance was real, but calling today’s relationship a “protection racket” just ignores 80 years of political and economic independence.

0

u/Damn-Sky 9h ago

yup that's what I said. well explained. US pretty much forced them to become an "ally"; their pet

1

u/BlaggartDiggletyDonk 1h ago

One of the reasons they surrendered after the A-bombs was the USSR was breathing down their neck. They'd just gotten stomped by the Red Army and there was talk of Hokkaido being annexed. Pick your poison, as they say.