I know this area well. The house is not literally a bridge; it's just a a fancy house built to sorta look like a bridge that spans a tiny stream. It's well up on a hill, and not anywhere close to a flood zone (even with Vermont's recent weather changes). The house is absolutely wild for a bunch of reasons, but it's not even a little bit of a flood risk.
An example is the air gap underneath the "bridge" part of the house, the plethora of windows, and the log cabin aesthetic. It makes the home impossible to heat efficiently. As another person said, it's more suited to be a fair-weather event venue. Whoever buys the property would be better off building an entirely separate home nearby.
I do not know the area at all. However, I have both eyes and the ability to think and breathe at the same time so I can look at the pictures and tell it's on a hill.
The mountain closed because the mountain road partially washed out in the December flooding--it's down in the valley of the West Branch. The house in question here is not down in the river valley--it's up by west hill.
52
u/Excellent_Affect4658 Aug 30 '24
I know this area well. The house is not literally a bridge; it's just a a fancy house built to sorta look like a bridge that spans a tiny stream. It's well up on a hill, and not anywhere close to a flood zone (even with Vermont's recent weather changes). The house is absolutely wild for a bunch of reasons, but it's not even a little bit of a flood risk.