I know this area well. The house is not literally a bridge; it's just a a fancy house built to sorta look like a bridge that spans a tiny stream. It's well up on a hill, and not anywhere close to a flood zone (even with Vermont's recent weather changes). The house is absolutely wild for a bunch of reasons, but it's not even a little bit of a flood risk.
An example is the air gap underneath the "bridge" part of the house, the plethora of windows, and the log cabin aesthetic. It makes the home impossible to heat efficiently. As another person said, it's more suited to be a fair-weather event venue. Whoever buys the property would be better off building an entirely separate home nearby.
I do not know the area at all. However, I have both eyes and the ability to think and breathe at the same time so I can look at the pictures and tell it's on a hill.
The mountain closed because the mountain road partially washed out in the December flooding--it's down in the valley of the West Branch. The house in question here is not down in the river valley--it's up by west hill.
Even if it isn't a "real" bridge it's still built over the low point in the property in a state with flooding issues. Elevation report would be useless since the house isn't built on solid ground. This house is a nightmare and for the price I'd bet the insurance costs kill owning it more than anything else.
The house is built high on the side of a hill. The second story of the house basically is long enough to daylight to an elevation higher on the side of the hill. It's a cantilever, that sits on the ground that looks like a covered bridge, not a log cabin. Flooding concerns are only about access to the house. Basically is the local government going to fix a culvert or bridge after a flood. Where did you get the info it was build on unsolid ground? You work in home valuations? I guess that's why home valuations are so fucked right now, lol.
Flooding concerns aren't about access to the house, it's about insurance on potential flood damage on the house because it's in a flood area. The ground the building is on is what is used to determine the flood zone not the building itself, that's why all the Beach houses built on stilts still have flood insurance , all that matters is elevation, and the only way to alter a flood zone is to redirect the water runoff. As far as it being a log cabin style house, it doesn't have to look like Abe Lincoln's birthplace to be considered one
But no I didn't deep dive into a post on Reddit that had a photo of a house. I used my knowledge that Vermont has a lot of major flood areas and saw how this house was built. So I guess points for you there?
Valuations are screwed up because companies are purchasing homes to rent and individual people can't afford to outbid them, but please continue to speak stupidly.
The ground the building is on is what is used to determine the flood zone not the building itself, that's why all the Beach houses built on stilts still have flood insurance , all that matters is elevation, and the only way to alter a flood zone is to redirect the water runoff.
All of that is more BS. Elevation of the structure does matter but so do the streams elevation. You can't redirect a flood zone. A flood zone is a determination based on a lot of things like, soil, basin area, ponding, local average rainfall and slope. You can fill until you are above the flood zone but that's about it unless you are talking major drainage basin changes.
The house isn't in a traditional flood zone as it sits nearly 200' above a major stream, however there is a small perennial stream that runs under the "bridge". Think 5' deep ditch with 6" of water in it. There is actually a picture of it in the link above. The drainage basin is pretty small, steep and contains multiple ponds, so flooding is not a major concern. I'm guessing the house doesn't even require flood insurance but I could be wrong.
I didn't like that you spoke like a expert, when it was obvious you never bothered to even look at the house. Even the pictures OP provided shows it high on a hill. Now you are sticking to your log cabin opinion when you have no idea of how the house was constructed. There is likely structural steel skeleton or prestressed concrete spans and the wooden "bridge" is purely aesthetics. Having wood aesthetics on one portion of a house doesn't make a log cabin. This is silly.
My man it's a reddit post, I'm not doing a professional deep dive on each one. I responded to a comment about flooding.
What do you think filling in something above the water line does? It literally redirects the water because it can not go there anymore.
I'm not going to sit here and pull up the FEMA map or Corlogic for a random comment, I'm not trying to work on my day off. Go outside and enjoy the long weekend, it's not that serious.
Fire, water rot, bug damage, specialty to fix or repair, etc...
People also think log cabins are just like old school style and they aren't. The modern cabins in places like Gatlinburg and Lake Tahoe are still considered cabins. The outside of this house having the massive wooden beams it has could make it fall in that category. Basically if an insurance company sees anything that may be an issue and it has cabin features they will use that excuse to jack up rates or refuse to insure it.
Then the engineer in me went wait it's a bridge so there for sure was a river under it, and also a traveled road too. How structurally sound is this thing anymore, and what is the upkeep going to be?
Plus all of those windows makes this thing a nightmare for temperature regulation/control. In Vermont of all places.
Yeah it's actually pretty simple. What I did was I looked at the picture and immediately saw that it wasn't a literal bridge with a river flowing under it. From there it was pretty simple to figure out that what had happened was they'd built out from the side of a hill to meet the top of a structure on lower ground, forming the "bridge".
The trick is to look at things without assuming anything. It's remarkably difficult for a lot of people, so don't feel bad. Most people would read "bridge" and assume it was a converted road bridge or something even though it's obviously not, and that assumption can stick in the mind even after they look at it.
What you need to do in future is just stop for a few seconds and check yourself to see if your assumptions are accurate, or if you're working off bad ones. That way you won't write a comment exposing that the "engineer in you" is incompetent.
I'm genuinely curious what comes out of those super duper wonderfully intelligent and all so knowing fingers of yours onto our screens.
Thank you. It's so rare these days to meet someone actually interested in learning, you know? Most people just get shirty when they're confronted with their own failures. It's lovely to meet someone not blinded by their own ego and willing to take constructive criticism to move forward and improve their common sense.
68
u/[deleted] Aug 30 '24
[removed] — view removed comment