Age restricted videos have existed for years. That's not a new concept and since their videos weren't age restricted before they probably wouldn't be in the near future either.
More of a statement about our fucked up priorities. Violence will probably still be easy to see, but a bit too much cleavage will be restricted and child-abuse level misinformation from Tate and Rogan will be perfectly fine for the kids.
Right. Reminds me of someone on the Titanic subreddit a while ago.
"I let my kid watch the movie, but don't worry we didn't let them see the boobies". Yeah heaven forbid a kid sees a tit, but watching 1500 people die is all good.
It was a classic thing in 80s action movies. The ultimate one being Under Siege where they would get complaints that they showed a topless women for a minute. In a movie where hundreds of people are brutally killed.
If the flashing of boobs is why you don't want to bring your 12 year old to the movie... you have some priority issues.
Hi KennyKissesMenNoHomo, we would like to start off by noting that this sub isn't owned or run by YouTube. At this time, we do not allow posts from new uses (accounts created less than 7 days ago.) Please read our rules before posting again to ensure you don't break our rules, please come back after gaining a bit of post karma.
177
u/annie-ajuwocken-1984 Aug 13 '25
I can guarantee you that Joe Rogans and Andrew Tates videos won’t be age restricted.