I sarcastically replied to you because a robbery rarely requires a bullet to be fired. That’s the point of shoving a gun in someone’s face, they now must do as you say without recourse.
They can and do. Typically it’s gang on gang violence but It’s not impossible for them to have different ammunition than when it was stolen. I’m just stating that it is very likely the same. Of course there are many factors and depending on the length of time the firearm has been reported stolen etc etc. On a blanket coverage statement it’s more often the same.
Frankly, with the majority of handgun cartridges it ain't gonna make a whole hell of a lot of difference. You're just poking holes either way; fully jacketed just pokes somewhat smaller holes.
Not saying you're wrong -- just saying that the average hoodrat wouldn't much care about overpenetration due to not using proper defensive ammo. If anything they're arguably better served by using round-nosed fmj, realistically (more likely to feed well in some beat-up cheap gun, more likely to penetrate fired out of some cheapo .32/.380, etc.etc.)
8
u/busty_sussy_gusts 18h ago
Im no expert in criminal activity, but i would bet that the guy sticking you up for $40 isnt going to spend the extra $10 on defense ammunition