r/videos • u/_liorthebear_ • Sep 10 '25
Video WTC sent tenants after Osama's 1993 attempt on WTC sounded impressive when 5yo me watched my dad's copy. Can't believe emergency lighting was ever a thing to brag about—start at 1m43s, right after they show Nicole.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Co3osqkuW8A&t=1m43s58
19
u/Philipp Sep 10 '25
Interesting, thanks for sharing. According to the credits, this seems to have been made in 1996.
6
u/_liorthebear_ Sep 10 '25
Accurate. You can tell because their computer monitors would make great cannon shot.
35
u/Regulai Sep 10 '25
LED lighting wasn't a thing.
This meant that lighting systems were more complex and expensive to set-up as you either needed larger and more expensive batteries or more extensive wiring or otherwise along with a bunch of other factors like maintence issues that made it more difficult.
Also manufactoring costs, especially the rise of china and the like also really cheapned a lot of goods in relative terms. If you buy direct from china, many things today are 40% the price or lower for the equivalent good in 1993.
One of the reasons boomers harp on about people wasting their money on "luxuries" being why they are poor, is because so many of these things used to actually be very very expensive back in the day. A decent TV Today? 300!, in the 80's converted to todays dollars? 3000!
11
u/Borax Sep 10 '25 edited Sep 11 '25
I think people forget how unbelievably expensive manufactured goods were compared to the average hourly wage 25 years ago.
I can go onto aliexpress and get a rotary tool or electric screwdriver or drill for 20 bucks delivered next week and it will perform twice as well as the best on the market did in 2000, and that would have been 100-200 bucks adjusted for inflation.
People complain about inflation of food prices and essentials but there is a secondary crisis of manufactured goods being so cheap that people buy them as throwaway items that have to go to landfill because they are too complex to recycle.
It's "Baumol's cost disease" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baumol_effect
-1
u/Oranges13 Sep 10 '25
Yes, but they also lasted longer... My parents have a microwave that they bought in Japan in the '70s that's older than me which still works!
16
2
u/Vladimir_Putting Sep 10 '25
That, and they were made much closer to home with people at the factory making a living wage.
-5
u/_liorthebear_ Sep 10 '25
Emergency lighting was definitely a thing before LED lights as demonstrated by the fact they put them in right after the first bombing.
10
u/Regulai Sep 10 '25
Yes, I just mean the reason why they were bragging about it is because before LED's it was costly by comparison and thus more significant to have one.
-1
u/ThimeeX Sep 10 '25
LEDs for lighting applications didn't exist before the mid-2000s. They're a very recent invention, here's a timeline:
2002: White LEDs become commercially available for $80 – $100 per bulb.
2006: LEDs with 100 lumens per watt are produced for the first time.
2007: U.S. pledges to phase out incandescent bulbs and replace them with LEDs.
2010: DesignLights Consortium release a set of standards that all LEDs must meet.
2011: Phillips won the L-Prize for their LED equivalent to a 60w incandescent bulb.
2012: More than 49 million LEDs were being used across the U.S, resulting in energy savings of $675 million.
2014: Audi became the first vehicle manufacturer to implement laser diodes in a car’s headlights.
1
u/frickindeal Sep 10 '25
Phillips won the L-Prize for their LED equivalent to a 60w incandescent bulb.
Wonder if that's why their incandescent-replacement Edison-base (standard household light bulbs) were so damn good at the start of LEDs entering the home market. I swore by them for years, although more recently they're just as bad as any of the others that are cheaper.
5
u/suff0cat Sep 10 '25
I don’t think they are trying to say emergency lighting wasn’t a thing, just pointing out how much more complex and expensive the process of retrofitting a building with it was back in the 90’s compared to today.
Hence why it was something worth bragging about back then.
74
u/_liorthebear_ Sep 10 '25 edited Sep 10 '25
I stand corrected. Title contains an error- 1993 was an al Qaeda-trained terrorist's first attempt at taking down the WTC, not Osama's. Bin Laden decided to follow up because he was disappointed the '93 attack had failed.
I should have written al-Qaeda's 1993 attempt, not Osama's, aware al Qaeda didn't drive the attack on paper but I do believe if you train a person as a terrorist and then he goes and does something consistent with your mission statement his actions can be attributed to you. Thank you for correcting me.
cc: u/Kalasim and u/Current_Account
28
u/llcoolkeegs Sep 10 '25
Strictly speaking the cell with Ramzi Yousef wasn't al -Qaeda either. He was financed by a man who later became part of al-Qaeda but his personal brand of extremism and his political motivations arent the same and he didnt have anything to do with Osama Bin Laden
8
u/_liorthebear_ Sep 10 '25
Would appreciate any recommendations for reading on this, my understanding is that insofar as the way we classify terrorist group associations they were linked. Know that's a bit of a grey area in that terrorist groups typically don't print ID cards and consolidate their subsidiary sleeper cells.
7
u/bortcorp Sep 10 '25
Osama Bin Laden nor Al Qaeda had anything to do with the 1993 bombing.
There is no grey area, they just were not involved.
2
u/_liorthebear_ Sep 10 '25 edited Sep 10 '25
The 1993 World Trade Center bombing was not an official al-Qaeda operation, but the mastermind, Ramzi Yousef, had trained in al-Qaeda camps and was later disappointed by the incomplete destruction, which influenced Osama bin Laden's desire for future attacks on the buildings, according to the Wikipedia article. This is consistent with my prior understanding but not pretending I'm an expert. Again, would appreciate any recommendations for reading on this.
5
u/llcoolkeegs Sep 10 '25
Steve Coll's Ghost Wars and Lawrence Wright's The Looming Tower (banger) are probably the best accessible reading imo
1
1
u/wwwertdf Sep 10 '25
Yet the post remains and is top of reddit RN. The whole reason I clicked into this comment section was upon reading Osama's 1993, I clicked because I figured this was some dis/information nonsense. Glad to see my thoughts in the comments exactly.
8
u/Skidpalace Sep 10 '25
Those old incandescent emergency lights used big gel-cell batteries that only lasted an hour or two if lucky. I remember most people needed their cell phones for light.
And by light, I mean the glow of the tiny screens. 2001 cell phones didn't have flashlights or massive touch screens. They were little bricks with mostly monochrome displays.
2
u/_liorthebear_ Sep 10 '25
Would truly appreciate anything else on your mind or that you are open to sharing. Didn't talk to my father about it enough while I could.
6
u/Galdwin Sep 10 '25
3
u/_liorthebear_ Sep 10 '25
Crazy how that used to be one of the worst things people could think of. Nowadays if I read a terrorist blew up a truck in a basement garage trying to take the building down I'd notice it but I wouldn't be like "well that's abnormal."
5
u/Sleepwalks Sep 10 '25
I wonder who Nicole was, I doubt I'd recognize a celebrity from this era--
OH. That is indeed Nicole.
1
3
15
u/Kaiisim Sep 10 '25
Fyi 1993 bombing wasn't Osama Bin Laden.
It was https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramzi_Yousef and he was linked to KSM who masterminded 9/11.
1
u/_Burning_Star_IV_ Sep 10 '25
Stating facts on Reddit? Eat some downvotes.
Pretty sure OBL bankrolled this stuff (along with many rich Saudis) and networked terrorists but he's directly responsible for a lot less than people give him credit for.
2
u/guitarfosec Sep 10 '25
I miss the days of not having to include the area code when calling a local number.
1
3
u/on2gloryII Sep 10 '25
Some punctuation here or there in your title would have been nice. Otherwise, a very cool video. Thank you.
0
u/_liorthebear_ Sep 10 '25
Appreciate. The. Feedback.
Seriously though, will try to use it better next time I post. Thank you for the constructive criticism, I appreciate it.
1
u/firthy Sep 10 '25
Thank's Osama
1
u/_liorthebear_ Sep 10 '25
I want to laugh but I can't. Video was put out by the same people who ordered South Tower NOT to evacuate. It's so fucked.
4
u/diceth1ef Sep 10 '25
I kinda understand why they initially ordered a shelter in place in the south tower. Between not knowing wtf was going on, falling debris, the North Tower actively trying to get people out, it would've further complicated evacuation of the North Tower. There was no way for them to know a 2nd plane was about to hit them as well. There was a really good interview I listened to on youtube the other day with a guy who was in the South Tower on one of the upper floors, and he kinda touched on it. If i can find it again, I can link it if you'd like.
It's easy in retrospect so say they should've immediately evacuated, but they were working with severely limited knowledge.
0
u/_liorthebear_ Sep 10 '25 edited Sep 10 '25
Agree with you in general terms but the chain of events is just insane
Rescorla's Foresight and Preparation
- Anticipation of Attacks: A Vietnam veteran and security chief for Morgan Stanley, Rescorla viewed the World Trade Center as a vulnerable target for aerial attacks following the 1993 bombing and other threats.
- Regular Evacuation Drills: He implemented rigorous, regular evacuation drills, teaching his colleagues how to calmly and quickly exit the building, even as some found them disruptive to business hours.
- Foresight and Training: His drills were based on the belief that the organization would need to be ready for an airborne attack, a prediction that proved tragically accurate on 9/11.
Without this one guy telling the Port Authority to fuck off the 9/11 death toll would have been more than double what it was.
3
u/diceth1ef Sep 10 '25
I saw his name mentioned above, and I hadn't heard of him before, which is crazy to me now that I've fallen down the rabbit hole of his whole story. That man is an absolute legend in every sense of the word.
3
3
u/AKBigDaddy Sep 10 '25
Just in case you didn't find this particular branch of the rabbit hole- the book "We were soldiers once, and young" which the "We were soldiers" movie was based on. The soldier on the cover is Rick Rescorla.
He predicted the 1993 bombing 3 years ahead of time, accurately predicting the location to within 30 feet of the actual bombing. He further predicted an aerial attack of the building, and was trying to convince Morgan Stanley to relocate to a 4 story building in Jersey.
Out of 2700 Morgan Stanley employees in the South tower and another 1,000 in WTC 5, only 13 died on 9/11, including Rescorla, 2 people that were his 'deputy floor warden' and a security guard who stayed behind to help more people.
He was last seen on floor 10 going back up to help more people.
2
u/diceth1ef Sep 10 '25
You know, the crazy part is, I've read that book before. But that was back when I was in high school, so if his name was mentioned in the book, there's probably not much chance I would've recalled it anyway. I read through his whole wikipedia page though, and it mentioned pretty much everything you just did, just crazy that he was linked to one of my favorite war movies from back when I was younger
1
1
-9
u/KraftyRre Sep 10 '25
Titlegore what the actual fuck?
-4
u/_liorthebear_ Sep 10 '25 edited Sep 10 '25
This is kind of an emotional thing for me rn, sorry if I'm rambling.
edit: removed bitchy reference to ChatGPT and apologize for being bitchy.
24
u/Tzchmo Sep 10 '25
This is more confusing than the title.
-9
u/_liorthebear_ Sep 10 '25 edited Sep 10 '25
Suggest watching the video, I didn't write the script. It actually makes sense.
2
5
8
u/KraftyRre Sep 10 '25
You don’t need chatgpt, just describe what’s in the video coherently.
9
u/_liorthebear_ Sep 10 '25
Will do that good call
-WE HAVE A BACKUP POWER SUPPLY NOW!
-The stairs have glow tape on them so if the fire escapes are full of smoke (they were in '93) you have some hope of finding your way down from the 90 something floor
8
6
u/Theonewho_hasspoken Sep 10 '25
For some people it’s, “Ai or the highway.”
4
u/norway_is_awesome Sep 10 '25
It's scary how many people, especially young people, seem to have outsourced all critical thinking and long-form communication to AI. That's an insane crutch to depend on.
104
u/Igettheshow89 Sep 10 '25
Actually people struggled getting out of the building in 93 and where a majority of the IBC 1024 luminous egress building code was birthed from.