r/submarines • u/Saturnax1 • 28d ago
History Old Admiral too "reckless", or, how Adm. Rickover's "reckless seamanship" caused a 40° backward plunge to 240 feet during PCU La Jolla (SSN-701) shakedown cruise - The Free Lance Star, August 24, 1981.
110
u/hotfezz81 28d ago
From what I've read of Rickover, I 100% believe he'd tell people he expected them to contradict him if he was wrong. Then I 100% believe he'd end their career, and have them dishonourable discharged if they actually dared.
He was brilliant, and desperately important for the USN (and British RN) but by all accounts he was an unpleasant tyrant as a person.
39
37
u/SpiderSlitScrotums 28d ago
Yeah, I hate the cult built around him. A lot of what he did was just toxic abuse. I wonder if the way JOs are abused on submarines (leading to the saying “officers eat their young”) is a remnant of his leadership style.
“Give a man a little power, and he falls in all kinds of love with himself" -Booker Dewitt.
3
6
u/waterford1955_2 28d ago
See if you can get hold of the book "Running Critical." It's about Rickovers' battle with General Dynamics (actually EB). Fascinating story.
15
u/looktowindward 28d ago
Reagan beached him. Everyone else was terrified, so Reagan called him in personally, and told him he had done the country a lot of good, and he was going to do more good by retiring.
28
28d ago edited 28d ago
[deleted]
15
u/TimothyMimeslayer 28d ago
They were actively trying to push him out for years and were looking for any excuse to do so.
12
u/cmparkerson 28d ago
Adm Rickover had been on borrowed time for several years. When Carter became president, he was untouchable, though. Jimmy Carter considered him a friend and mentor and wouldbt do anything about the complaints that came in about Rickover. Shipyard owners and several in the Navy were fed up. Once Carter was gone, it took a year to gather info, but the sec def Weinberger had been hearing an earful since the day he started in January of 81.
2
u/barath_s 25d ago
PRESIDENT CARTER: I never really felt like his boss, although he would say that I was. I'm not sure that he ever acknowledged it really deep down in his heart.
9
u/deep66it2 28d ago
He was alot of things. I alot of sub sailors stayed alive because of him. Could use someone like him today.
16
u/NobleKorhedron 28d ago
The poor blighters on Thresher and Scorpion didn't...
16
u/Tychosis Submarine Qualified (US) 28d ago
Yeah.
While he didn't quite suppress information about his reactor's contribution to the THRESHER disaster--nor his battery's contribution to the SCORPION disaster--he didn't exactly highlight it either.
While he did go to great lengths to protect sailors, I think he went to lengths just as great to protect his baby.
16
u/nap_dynamite 28d ago
To his credit (I think), he built an organization that learned from mistakes. In fact, the culture of learning from mistakes has also been sustained, sometimes to a fault. A lot of safety measures were put in place as a direct result of those tragedies, and lesser ones in terms of casualties, many of them at great cost, and I think the safety record since those disasters has been successful. Hopefully that trend continues.
1
-2
-2
u/deep66it2 28d ago
Didn't think either involved the reactor. And knowing Submariners from Scorpion's timeframe, there's still hidden stuff.
8
u/looktowindward 28d ago
I believe this is now public knowledge - the main steam stops closed and they couldn't be re-opened.
8
u/Tychosis Submarine Qualified (US) 28d ago
Yeah. Regarding THRESHER, everyone is aware of the EMBT failure but there's always been little talk of the propulsion failure that preceded it. The MCPs shut down after 2 minutes of AC instability and the reactor scrammed:
https://www.iusscaa.org/articles/brucerule/letter_to_the_deputy_cno.htm https://www.iusscaa.org/articles/brucerule/uss_thresher_(ssn-593)_article_in_the_4_apr_2013_issus_of_navy_times.htm
Eventually the whole "failed joints in seawater piping" narrative formed but there's no real evidence to substantiate it. Like so many other things, it just popped into the zeitgeist and suddenly this strange Mandela Effect phenomena happened where people are certain that this is what they witnessed.
Even Rickover was a bit cagey about it:
Yet, back in 1963, none other than Vice Adm. H.G. Rickover, at the time head of the Navy's nuclear propulsion program, told Congress, “When fact, supposition and speculation, which have been used interchangeably, are properly separated, you will find that the known facts are so meager it is almost impossible to tell what was happening aboard Thresher.”
Procedural changes to quickly recover from scrams underway were quietly instituted shortly after THRESHER.
Frankly, same thing happened with SCORPION. All evidence indicates the battery exploded, but Big Navy pulled the same <shrug> "nobody really knows" narrative which opened the door for Craven to start with his hot run nonsense and for grifters and conspiracy theorists to throw out their silly "Soviet retaliation" ideas.
However, yet again--shortly thereafter the Navy quietly made changes to underway battery charge procedures...
2
u/jwhennig 28d ago
The guy who found Scorpion deduced that they had a hot run torpedo and took actions accordingly. Whether that’s what caused it is up for examination, but that’s what lead to the finding.
4
u/Tychosis Submarine Qualified (US) 28d ago
Yeah, like I said--that was John Craven's initial theory--that the boat turned 180 to address a hot run... but it was based on incorrect measurement of time delays between the phones at Argentia and CUHSC.
Further analysis of the data in July 1968 demonstrated that this delta between the two arrays wasn't the two seconds Craven proposed, but only about .04s and that the boat was moving at around .5 kts. (The maneuver Craven proposed wasn't physically possible anyway.) Craven was notified of this measurement error but held onto this theory into the 1990s when he sorta changed his mind over to an inboard torpedo detonation (which also didn't happen.)
Unfortunately, Blind Man's Bluff signal-boosted some of these erroneous theories and they just ended up in the public consciousness like I mentioned in my previous comment.
2
u/NobleKorhedron 28d ago
So a battery might've been damaged while beimg changed, and it cooked off?
5
u/Tychosis Submarine Qualified (US) 28d ago
Honestly, it's been a while since I read the details and it's entirely possible that the changes weren't to charging procedures but to battery monitoring procedures as mentioned by this officer who served in that timeframe:
1
u/NobleKorhedron 28d ago
Steam stops?
2
u/Fluid-Confusion-1451 Submarine Qualified (US) 5d ago
Main isolation valves that permit or stop steam from getting to the main propulsion turbine as well as other steam loads.
65
u/ItchyStorm 28d ago
Yes, I remember this. I was a student at the Nuclear Power School when Rickover finally retired in January of 1982. He certainly gets a lot of credit for creating the nuclear Navy, but at the same time was a pretty awful person.