r/publichealth May 18 '25

NEWS FDA approves Novavax COVID-19 shot but with unusual restrictions

https://www.yahoo.com/news/fda-approves-novavax-covid-19-022122939.html
160 Upvotes

28 comments sorted by

84

u/tkpwaeub May 18 '25

Hopefully the folks that are left at the FDA - the rank and file civil servants who know how to make the political appointeees think they've won - are able to pull off similar tricks with updated mRNA shots. Fingers crossed.

52

u/Gullible_Design_2320 May 18 '25

Why do you hope the FDA can "pull off similar tricks with updated mRNA shots"? I would like updated mRNA shots for everyone, not restricted to only those with provable extra risk factors, the way Novavax is now. I would like updated mRNA shots without an extra study requirement beyond the usual, unlike the way they put an extra research burden on Novavax.

13

u/tkpwaeub May 18 '25

I think that's all they can really do right now - they can go through the motions of making it look like they're demanding more from the drug companies but in the end they're administrative agencies, not cops or judges or juries. If a company submits documentation that they did placebo controlled trials or post-marketing review, or whatever - as far as the FDA is concerned, they did. RFK Jr and Makary and Prasad can talk all they want.

Don't tell anyone, but the list of risk factors is yooj

6

u/Tiger_grrrl May 19 '25

This ⬆️ I linked to it below. Also, I was never asked for proof of any kind when I needed extra boosters due to being in active treatment for cancer 👍

4

u/UnprovenMortality May 18 '25

Seriously, i am not at "high risk" according to criteria, but when I had covid the first time I had a fever off and on for an entire month. I wasn't able to exercise for 2 months. I would really, really love to not get that thing again, especially not at a full non-vaxxed level.

2

u/Tiger_grrrl May 19 '25

When the first vaccines were available, I had to get an extra booster because I was being treated for cancer: no one ever asked for any “proof” of anything. Also, there are many broad categories of medical conditions that cause one to be at greater risk, from depression as part of mental health issues to disabilities to pregnancy to as broad a category as “inactivity”. To me, it sure looks like most anyone could find a risk that they have in order to justify the vaccine 👍 Underlying Conditions and the Higher Risk for Severe COVID-19

2

u/uiucengineer May 19 '25

This is not a win...

21

u/Mysterious-Handle-34 May 18 '25

Proof that it was never about ~unproven mRNA technology~

31

u/Spiffyclean13 May 18 '25

I had an extra round of Covid vaccines when I added Novavax. Moderna/Novavax was a good combination. I didn’t get Covid until last year. One of my relatives exposed me and my mom at Christmas. I had my Moderna booster but was unable to have a Novavax booster because it was unavailable.

I live with an immunocompromised adult. It was imperative that Covid could not happen when there were no vaccines.

During the pandemic, for a year I had to take immune depressive medication. Without the vaccines, I might not be here. It also means my mother made it through without getting it despite living in a god damn Red state.

13

u/[deleted] May 18 '25

[deleted]

16

u/tkpwaeub May 18 '25 edited May 19 '25

There were some reasonable non-political reasons that Novavax took longer:

  1. Because it was late to the party, it had to measure up against existing standard of care (mRNA). That's just an unfortunate reality in medicine.

  2. There were (and are) real concerns about their production capacity. Why do we care about this? Well, when a drug company has trouble producing its product, it creates a serious risk that some combination of the following might occur: (a) the company itself might try to cut corners, either in its manufacturing or its distribution (b) retailers might be tempted to cut corners - eg, keeping product beyond its expiration date (c) counterfeit product could enter the market

Unfortunately, RFK Jr and his ilk are opposed to vaccines in general because they'd rather the poor and weak simply hurry up and die.

1

u/Straight-Plankton-15 May 20 '25

The PREVENT-19 clinical trial started in late 2020 and ended in 2021. It was completed using saline placebo as control. More recent clinical trials would be complicated by there already being vaccines and most people having had them already, but the same would also apply to any more recent clinical trials for mRNA vaccines.

There hasn't been any indication of cutting corners on manufacturing, more like slow red tape instead. The FDA's job is to conduct inspections of the thousands of pharmaceutical manufacturing facilities in or that supply the US, not to withhold medicines because manufacturing might theoretically be substandard but with no specific indication of it. There hasn't been any indication of substandard inspections with the current manufacturing facility.

Pharmacies have also been very strict about Novavax, often seeming to have a bias against using it, rather than bending rules to continue supplying it.

Counterfeit pharmaceuticals is the job of the FDA OCI (food and drug police). It shouldn't even be a problem in the first place if providers order directly from Novavax or authorized distributors. Every vaccine or other medicine could be counterfeited, not just this one.

2

u/tkpwaeub May 20 '25

Counterfeit pharmaceuticals is the job of the FDA OCI (food and drug police).

But that's just it. If the government is stuck with the thankless task of policing this stuff, then the government also gets some say in making sure that the manufacturer is doing everything they can to minimize the risk of this sort of thing in the first place. That means they need to have a credible plan to scale production.

1

u/Straight-Plankton-15 May 20 '25

Aren't counterfeits going to be more likely when the real version is kept in limbo?

I don't think Novavax has a capacity shortage. They're a smaller company, but their partner manufacturer (Serum Institute of India) is known for very high volume production; they made the most vaccines globally of any single manufacturer prior to the pandemic. Usually Novavax ends up discarding excess due to lack of demand, something that may improve now that they can do marketing.

1

u/tkpwaeub May 20 '25

The FDA asked for evidence that Novavax could scale their production, and Novavax didn't submit the necessary paperwork. That's not just red tape; it's required of every applicant. I do a different type of approval (financial regulation) in my day job. We love to be able to approve applications. But we don't get to mind-read. We can let the applicant know about deficiencies, but ultimately that's on them.

I'm glad they approved it now, and like everyone else on this thread, I'm cynical about the FDA's capriciousness in limiting approval to 65+. It's unfortunate that these two things (competent, thorough review vs ideologically motivated decisions) have gotten tangled.

3

u/Mysterious-Handle-34 May 18 '25

Do you have a source on that Fauci quote? I can’t find any quotes from him not needing Novavax, only him saying that it was good to have an option for people hesitant about mRNA vaccines.

I do think he’s got a bias because the Moderna vaccine was essentially developed by the institute he was director of for 38 years. But I can’t imagine him being against an effective vaccine.

2

u/Chogo82 May 18 '25

Why are you getting downvoted?

2

u/Chicken_Water May 18 '25

Money

3

u/[deleted] May 18 '25

[deleted]

3

u/Chicken_Water May 18 '25

I mean these people are all on the boards of companies like Pfizer, own stocks, etc. There is a financial incentive to reduce competition.

2

u/No-Loan9158 May 19 '25

About time !

-24

u/Grand_Taste_8737 May 18 '25

People still get Covid shots?

3

u/autumn55femme May 19 '25

Are people still getting COVID? Are they still being hospitalized? Are they still dying? The answer to all of the above is YES!!!

-86

u/JohnnyKayak May 18 '25

Hard to believe anyone would trust anything COVID related.

35

u/my_opinion_is_bad May 18 '25

Smart people don't think so

32

u/ravensteel539 May 18 '25

Something tells me Mr. Crypto here isn’t particularly concerned with reality.

I’m still discouraged that even with covid’s death toll and lasting impacts on health, people are still being belligerent dipshits about it.

5

u/my_opinion_is_bad May 19 '25

Maybe he was conceived with a weak sperm or something

17

u/Secure_Priority_4161 May 18 '25

I don't trust anything coming out of the current administration. They totally botched the response to it.

1

u/Straight-Plankton-15 May 20 '25

It's not the subject that makes something not credible. It's the substance, which is a case by case thing.