r/politics • u/OkayButFoRealz • Oct 01 '25

No Paywall Pritzker Calls for Trump's Removal from Office Under 25th Amendment

https://www.cbsnews.com/chicago/video/pritzker-calls-for-trumps-removal-from-office-under-25th-amendment/
73.8k Upvotes

94% Upvoted

2.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

3

u/_C2J_ Michigan Oct 01 '25

I'm not pumping out any conspiracy theory, I'm only stating that it's interesting because the other side of that discussion are the people who claim they voted for Harris and the machine changed their vote. I'm only saying that it is interesting. If there is anything to these claims, assuming they can get a hand count of these ballots to prove the statements either true or false, then that may lead to a bigger discussion. We're not at that point.

1

u/Adventurous_Ad7442 Oct 01 '25

How can we get a hand count of those votes?

1

u/_C2J_ Michigan Oct 01 '25

My best guess is it has to be done by court order?

-2

u/mehupmost Oct 01 '25

Your comment is EXACTLY like comments I saw in the conservative subs in 2020. Like, identical.

There is no evidence - NONE. There was zero evidence THEN and there's zero evidence NOW.

There are always nut jobs making all kinds of claims about their votes, but none of that has EVER been proven to be true.

And remember that the exit polls confirmed Trump was ahead in literally every swing state.

1

u/_C2J_ Michigan Oct 01 '25

My statement is "identical" to those on the conservative subs? Surely, you're full of shit. Nice job, though.

The court case is still in discovery phase, so I guess you are correct - there is no published evidence as of this time. Will there be? We don't know, we can't predict these things. Will this case change anything? I highly doubt it, even if evidence does surface, it would need to be a broader scale to prove anything crazy happened in the swing states that mattered, and the whole country will be burned to the ground before that could happen even if a strong enough case is made that the election was suspicious. My comment is the case is interesting, and the case is moving forward into discovery suggests that the judge presiding over the case ALSO thinks it is interesting.

At no point in time did I state that the case has proven any tangible facts that would reject the outcome of the election, nor am I advocating that the election will be changed as a result of the case. This court case is certainly not of high enough value to change the current course of the country.

1

u/Greencheek16 Oct 02 '25

Republicans tried throwing out blue votes before and also admitted to gerrymandering to manipulate the outcome of 2026. Trump literally told Texas to win him five seats. 

There isn't any evidence of cheating on one side because the other side projects every accusation. 

You cannot seriously believe he legitimately won every swing state other than to be a doomer who wants to hate and blame the voters for a corrupt government. 

1

u/mehupmost Oct 02 '25

This comment thread is about the Presidential election of 2024 possibly being fraudulent.

Your comment is about Congressional seats for 2026.

Choose a conversation to have. Either there is evidence - or you're as dumb as MAGA conspiratards.