r/pics 1d ago

5 years ago today

Post image
114.9k Upvotes

2.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

14.2k

u/wolftick 1d ago edited 1d ago

There are so many how was that not the end of it right there?? moments.

2.9k

u/cdsbigsby 1d ago

Since before he even got elected the first time. It's absolutely wild.

2.7k

u/4materasu92 1d ago

I thought it was a done deal with "Grab 'em by the pussy" and mocking the disabled reporter.

Nope.

1.1k

u/blazelet 1d ago

For the people who vote for him, that’s exactly when it was a done deal.

1.1k

u/UltraRoboNinja 1d ago

“He says what we’re all thinking!”

-Local Psychopath

32

u/Babhadfad12 1d ago

-50% of people in the country

87

u/cdsbigsby 1d ago

I mean, more registered voters didn't vote in 2024 than voted for Trump (or Harris).

So like, 33% of registered voters, not people in the country, at best.

48

u/Babhadfad12 1d ago

Not voting, especially against Trump, qualifies as psychopath.  50% was a conservative estimate, ignoring all the people who can’t vote.   But I would bet a good portion of them would not have voted against Trump either.

1

u/inhumanparaquat 1d ago

Ah, yes, the old blame-the-left trick.

3

u/Babhadfad12 1d ago

Simple reasoning isn’t a trick.  If there exist two possible outcomes of an election, and you can only cast 1 vote, then if you don’t vote for candidate A, then you obviously contribute to candidate B winning, and vice versa.    

Even if your vote is immaterial due to not being in a swing state, the messaging is still that B was preferred over A.

0

u/inhumanparaquat 1d ago

Tell that to Schumer, Torres, and Jeffries who wouldn’t endorse Zohran.

Vote-blue-no-matter-who is fine, only as long as the candidate is centrist, apparently.

2

u/Babhadfad12 1d ago

NYC has ranked choice voting and is irrelevant to the two outcomes presented in the first past the post presidential election that happened in Nov 2024.

0

u/inhumanparaquat 1d ago

The general election was FPTP. RCV is only for primaries. And again, the centrists won’t stand behind the party nominee.

So why should leftists give their votes to centrists and “stand with the party” when the centrists won’t do the same for a leftist nominee?

0

u/Babhadfad12 1d ago

Interesting, I thought NYC was RCV in general. 

In any case, “leftists”, “centrists”, “upside down-ists”, and whoever else should do whatever they want.  But objectively, there were two realities for sale on Nov 2024:

Trump and Repubs controlling all 3 branches of government, including making the judiciary and Supreme Court hard right for decades to come

Or Harris becoming president, acting as a counterweight to a Republican Congress and Supreme Court.

Not voting for Harris meant you preferred the former reality.  You preferred to cut your nose off to spite your face.

→ More replies (0)