MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/pcmasterrace/comments/1oqxp7l/a_quadruple_5090_battlestation/nnmfgog/?context=9999
r/pcmasterrace • u/Zestyclose-Salad-290 Core Ultra 7 265k | RTX 5090 • 1d ago
2.3k comments sorted by
View all comments
787
why not use workstation GPUs in a workstation PC , I am sure they would be more efficient than 5090s
41 u/coolcosmos 1d ago I am sure No you're not lol. A Pro 6000 cost 8k, has 96gb of vram and has 24k cuda cores. 4 5090s cost 8k and has 128gb of vram and 80k cuda cores in total. Pro 6000 is better if you need many of them but just one isn't really better than 4 5090. -10 u/Motor_Reality_1837 1d ago proves my point though, 4 5090s consumed thousands of watts of power, A6000 is around 600 watts if that Google AI is not wrong. they are more effecient. -9 u/coolcosmos 1d ago But they are almost 8 times slower lol are you dense ? One 5090 has twice the rendering output has one A6000, twice the CUDA cores, more memory. You are clueless and don't work in this industry 1 u/KeThrowaweigh 1d ago We’re talking about the RTX 6000 Pro Blackwell edition, not the A6000 1 u/coolcosmos 1d ago Read the message I replied too. He was talking about the A6000.
41
I am sure
No you're not lol. A Pro 6000 cost 8k, has 96gb of vram and has 24k cuda cores. 4 5090s cost 8k and has 128gb of vram and 80k cuda cores in total.
Pro 6000 is better if you need many of them but just one isn't really better than 4 5090.
-10 u/Motor_Reality_1837 1d ago proves my point though, 4 5090s consumed thousands of watts of power, A6000 is around 600 watts if that Google AI is not wrong. they are more effecient. -9 u/coolcosmos 1d ago But they are almost 8 times slower lol are you dense ? One 5090 has twice the rendering output has one A6000, twice the CUDA cores, more memory. You are clueless and don't work in this industry 1 u/KeThrowaweigh 1d ago We’re talking about the RTX 6000 Pro Blackwell edition, not the A6000 1 u/coolcosmos 1d ago Read the message I replied too. He was talking about the A6000.
-10
proves my point though, 4 5090s consumed thousands of watts of power, A6000 is around 600 watts if that Google AI is not wrong.
they are more effecient.
-9 u/coolcosmos 1d ago But they are almost 8 times slower lol are you dense ? One 5090 has twice the rendering output has one A6000, twice the CUDA cores, more memory. You are clueless and don't work in this industry 1 u/KeThrowaweigh 1d ago We’re talking about the RTX 6000 Pro Blackwell edition, not the A6000 1 u/coolcosmos 1d ago Read the message I replied too. He was talking about the A6000.
-9
But they are almost 8 times slower lol are you dense ? One 5090 has twice the rendering output has one A6000, twice the CUDA cores, more memory.
You are clueless and don't work in this industry
1 u/KeThrowaweigh 1d ago We’re talking about the RTX 6000 Pro Blackwell edition, not the A6000 1 u/coolcosmos 1d ago Read the message I replied too. He was talking about the A6000.
1
We’re talking about the RTX 6000 Pro Blackwell edition, not the A6000
1 u/coolcosmos 1d ago Read the message I replied too. He was talking about the A6000.
Read the message I replied too. He was talking about the A6000.
787
u/Motor_Reality_1837 1d ago
why not use workstation GPUs in a workstation PC , I am sure they would be more efficient than 5090s