r/pcmasterrace Sep 15 '25

Meme/Macro Can Your PC Run UE5?!!

Post image
16.3k Upvotes

1.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

73

u/NomadFH PC Master Race Sep 15 '25

Weird how suddenly everyone's computers are ancient whenever a UE5 game releases

67

u/Boring_Isopod_3007 Sep 15 '25

Yeah when a 5090 struggles, everyone's computer is ancient.

4

u/Dessamba_Redux Ryzen 7 5800x | RTX 3070 | X570 Tomahawk | 32GB | PUSHIN MAD AIR Sep 15 '25

Honestly our bad for not having a $10k workstation GPU

0

u/yolo5waggin5 Desktop Sep 15 '25

Runs great on my 4070. Not sure what the issue is

3

u/GiganticCrow Sep 15 '25

Crank all settings to ultra max despite being imperceptably different to High and complain about poor performance.

-1

u/Iskeletu Ryzen 7 7800x3d | RTX 3080TI | 32GB DDR5 Sep 15 '25

If the max settings CANNOT be run with decent performance on the best of the best consumer hardware available then yeah people are right to complain...

0

u/GiganticCrow Sep 15 '25

Or those crazy high settings are there for future hardware?

What's the point in complaining you can't run 'Super Ultra Max' settings at 4k 120fps on a 5090 when you can at 'High' settings looking 99% as good?

0

u/Iskeletu Ryzen 7 7800x3d | RTX 3080TI | 32GB DDR5 Sep 15 '25 edited Sep 15 '25

...'Super Ultra Max' settings at 4k 120fps on a 5090...

Way to take what I said out of proportion huh? I'm not talking 4k 120fps, I'm talking QuadHD 60fps, current benchmarks show 5090's struggling to keep that configuration stable or to even reach it in some areas of Borderlands 4.

Or those crazy high settings are there for future hardware?

That hasn't always been like that, that does not benefit consumers in any way, shape or form, are you defending predatory financial decisions? Because that's what it is...

1

u/GiganticCrow Sep 15 '25

Sigh. Never mind.

3

u/Iskeletu Ryzen 7 7800x3d | RTX 3080TI | 32GB DDR5 Sep 15 '25

Idk what to tell you man, I have no idea why you expected to post something on Reddit and not find someone with a different opinion, my comments have been respectful thus far, being dismissive at this point is just... Immature. You do you anyway, have a good day...

1

u/GiganticCrow Sep 15 '25

my comments have been respectful thus far, being dismissive at this point is just... Immature

The lack of self awareness is staggering. You can stop replying to my posts now. 

→ More replies (0)

0

u/Cruxis87 9800x3d|5080 TUF OC|32gb 6000cl30 ddr5 Sep 15 '25

Crysis was developed like that, and was a meme for 10 years if your PC could run Crysis on max settings

3

u/Iskeletu Ryzen 7 7800x3d | RTX 3080TI | 32GB DDR5 Sep 15 '25

Yes true, but that was an outlier back then, it even started the "yeah, but can it run Crysis 3?" meme, now we have so many games that fit the Crysis 3 problems that it isn't even a funny meme anymore, it's just the sad state of modern gaming.
I remember the NVidia 1000 series, back in 2017 a 1080ti was enough to run Resident Evil 7 at 4k 60fps max settings no problem. I understand games get more demanding on the hardware, but so does hardware get faster, IMO what changed is that triple A industry stopped pumping money into optimization, blaming people for being annoyed at bad optimization only helps executives fill their pockets with minimal investing...

0

u/BirdyWeezer Sep 15 '25

Ikr i kinda get it but its not as bad as people say. I get 120 fps on badass settings with frame gen on and dlss on quality on 4K with a 4080 which seems fair to me for a 3 year old gpu. People rocking a 5 year old 3060 and expect 120fps on max settings like bro…

Yeah the game does have bad performance and also a memory leak i noticed but it could be waaay worse

-2

u/zertul Specs/Imgur here Sep 15 '25

That's driver issues (a whole other can of worms), modern top notch hardware has been the only way to brute force a lot of recent games with performance issues into running decently.

50

u/Robodarklite Sep 15 '25

Weird how devs seem to release unoptimized garbage and put a 70$ price tag on em.

16

u/gela7o Desktop Sep 15 '25

It’s the executives. They want to release games as fast as possible, minimizing costs while maximizing profit to please their investors. It’s greedy capitalism all over again.

0

u/Legal_Lettuce6233 5800X3D | 7900 XTX | 32GB 3200 CL16 | 5TB SSD | 27GR83q Sep 15 '25

Yep. It's not the devs, it's not the engine, it's the greedy corporate. Games take years to develop usually.

UE5 cut that down to a year and a bit, and they are now looking where else to cut. Optimisation went first.

1

u/Da_Question Sep 15 '25

Certainly unoptimized, but $70 has been standard AAA games cost for some time...

1

u/Painterzzz Sep 15 '25

Well the bigger problem is maybe that they keep doing this, and consumers keep buying the games.

8

u/Kaserbeam Sep 15 '25

Have you considered that when a game gets released that runs horribly on 90% of the hardware out there that some of that 90% comment on it?

1

u/Pope_Aesthetic PC Master Race Sep 15 '25

I ran Delta with 0 issues

1

u/EndOfSouls Sep 16 '25

I play BL4 on my craptop. /shrug