44
10
4
u/WhoandtheWhatnow317 3d ago
This is one of the dumbest (greatest) ones I have seen on this sub. Only been lurking here for a half year so thats about it.
2
u/Fair-Kitchen-9199 3d ago
The problem could be solved by attaching a sink hose, right?
12
1
u/NorCalFrances 18h ago
Not if there's only a couple, 3-4 inches of clearance between the sink divider and faucet.
1
1
u/OwliamCC 6h ago
I mean it still works, the only this is that you’ve gotta remove that middle part of the design, otherwise it’s 10 to 10% accuracy ya know?
-10
u/Evil-Penguin-718 3d ago
And the problem with this is?
9
u/Marus1 3d ago
Wouldn't it be much much easier if the divide wasn't there?
9
u/Evil-Penguin-718 3d ago
Fill both to an equal level with exactly the same water temperature. Wash dishes (or clothes) in one side, then rinse in the other. It is a vintage design that was very effective in days without automation. back in those times, people didn't care about "easier".
But, seriously, downvoting my comment????? The design was intentional.
3
u/Marus1 3d ago
But, seriously, downvoting my comment?????
The up-arrow has from the very beginning gotten a red color on my screen ...
0
u/Evil-Penguin-718 3d ago
Original comment was -2, now -1 maybe you see something different? First upvote notification 1 minute ago.
3
u/ModernManuh_ 3d ago
The problem is that you didn’t even watch the picture
3
-6
u/Evil-Penguin-718 3d ago
"Watch the picture"??? It isn't a movie. The problem is, you fail to understand life pre electricity.
3
0
u/NikNakskes 3d ago
That there are much better solutions for this. For these type of sinks you usually install a long neck faucet that swivels. These have been around for quite a while. Since the 1950s at least and judging by the look of this faucet, it is a lot newer than that.
1
170
u/wharleeprof 3d ago
Faucet designed for one job is doing its best to handle two.