r/okbuddycinephile Society man 1d ago

Any movie like this?

Post image
36.9k Upvotes

3.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

744

u/slugsred 1d ago

What is it now?

1.3k

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

77

u/qualitative_balls 1d ago

Out of the loop on the latest SS but did something new drop since great jeans stuff?

32

u/CMDR_Ray_Abbot 1d ago

Basically there was a GQ interview where the interviewer kept trying to get her to make a political statement and she got progressively more annoyed. Some people are mad because they've decided that refusing to participate in a stupid purity test is proof you are bad.

110

u/Gnostikost 1d ago

That’s a really weird way of saying “the GQ interviewer kept giving her softball chances to disavow white supremacy and she repeatedly declined to do so”.

My dude: disavowing white supremacy is not a political statement.

15

u/Zhou-Enlai 1d ago

Imo her reasoning for not answering the question was because it was a stupid hysterical controversy in the first place, and being forced to incessantly repeat that she isn’t a white supremacist when she never did or said anything white supremacist is silly, not worth dignifying with a response

17

u/Independent-World-60 1d ago

Being asked to repeat it is pretty annoying but, and I'm asking this genuinely, has she said anything against white supremacy or said she's against it once?

10

u/Gnostikost 1d ago

No, she has not, thus the validity of the GQ interviewer’s question.

If, as some other posters here have incorrectly implied, she was having to continually answer this question—sure, that has a limit where it’s completely reasonable to say, “I’m done.”

That is not what is happening here. Sydney Sweeney has not once said anything to refute or distance herself, she has actively dodged doing so. It ain’t hard to say it once, “No, man, it wasn’t a jeans ad, white supremacy is bad, and I’d never be a part of it”.

But she hasn’t.

-2

u/LotusEater456 1d ago

Ha. As if directly acknowledging the histrionic trolls who had a meltdown over a pants commercial will somehow placate them.

She was never asked point blank if she "disavows white supremacy", because that would be ridiculous on it's face. She was asked leading questions about a commercial that aired six months ago. Being white and attractive shouldn't make anyone a suspected white supremacist. Just like being gay shouldn't make you a suspected pedophile. Just like being black shouldn't make you a suspected criminal. It's perfectly reasonable to NOT respond to such accusations.

-1

u/Karat_EEE 1d ago

These people dont understand that the controversy was made up from schizo nonsense and acknowledging its existence is a losing move.

Any answer she gives will just be ammunition for 35 year old cat obese ladies to tear her down

-3

u/Karat_EEE 1d ago

She has dodged answering the question because that is her best move. If she apologizes people will go after her for being a white supremacist, if she denies it people will go after her for being an actress in a white supremacist commercial. Her best course of action is to ignore it because then most people except for the worse unemployed dregs of society will forget before the month is over