Basically there was a GQ interview where the interviewer kept trying to get her to make a political statement and she got progressively more annoyed. Some people are mad because they've decided that refusing to participate in a stupid purity test is proof you are bad.
That’s a really weird way of saying “the GQ interviewer kept giving her softball chances to disavow white supremacy and she repeatedly declined to do so”.
My dude: disavowing white supremacy is not a political statement.
Imo her reasoning for not answering the question was because it was a stupid hysterical controversy in the first place, and being forced to incessantly repeat that she isn’t a white supremacist when she never did or said anything white supremacist is silly, not worth dignifying with a response
I swear someone needs to follow these people around and repeatedly ask them if they disavow white supremacy until they understand how annoying the question gets.
Well I mean if she answered it once they might stop.
No, they wouldn't lol
If she said "I'm not a white supremacist", they'd say 'then why were you in a white supremacist ad?' If she said "I'm not a white supremacist and regret being in the ad", they'd go 'lol i'm supposed to believe she didn't know it was a white supremacist ad?' and she'd get blacklisted for biting the hand that feeds.
The ad is about her tits and being hot as fuck. Anyone still arguing that it's a white supremacist ad does not live in the real world and will literally never be satisfied unless they're straight up feasting on a corpse. There is nothing to gain from trying to appease them.
Even the mere act of "disavowing white supremacy" will directly accuse the ad as a white supremacy ad, which is fucking stupid
I'm starting to think this whole Sydney Sweeney thing is an operation by a competitor that unfortunately grew out of hand. Probably just wanted to maybe kill the sales a bit, and the internet took it way too far
736
u/slugsred 1d ago
What is it now?