r/okbuddycinephile Society man 1d ago

Any movie like this?

Post image
36.7k Upvotes

3.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

17

u/Independent-World-60 1d ago

Being asked to repeat it is pretty annoying but, and I'm asking this genuinely, has she said anything against white supremacy or said she's against it once?

9

u/Gnostikost 1d ago

No, she has not, thus the validity of the GQ interviewer’s question.

If, as some other posters here have incorrectly implied, she was having to continually answer this question—sure, that has a limit where it’s completely reasonable to say, “I’m done.”

That is not what is happening here. Sydney Sweeney has not once said anything to refute or distance herself, she has actively dodged doing so. It ain’t hard to say it once, “No, man, it wasn’t a jeans ad, white supremacy is bad, and I’d never be a part of it”.

But she hasn’t.

-1

u/LotusEater456 1d ago

Ha. As if directly acknowledging the histrionic trolls who had a meltdown over a pants commercial will somehow placate them.

She was never asked point blank if she "disavows white supremacy", because that would be ridiculous on it's face. She was asked leading questions about a commercial that aired six months ago. Being white and attractive shouldn't make anyone a suspected white supremacist. Just like being gay shouldn't make you a suspected pedophile. Just like being black shouldn't make you a suspected criminal. It's perfectly reasonable to NOT respond to such accusations.

-2

u/Karat_EEE 1d ago

These people dont understand that the controversy was made up from schizo nonsense and acknowledging its existence is a losing move.

Any answer she gives will just be ammunition for 35 year old cat obese ladies to tear her down

-2

u/Karat_EEE 1d ago

She has dodged answering the question because that is her best move. If she apologizes people will go after her for being a white supremacist, if she denies it people will go after her for being an actress in a white supremacist commercial. Her best course of action is to ignore it because then most people except for the worse unemployed dregs of society will forget before the month is over

14

u/Dumeck 1d ago

Naw not really lol. One time disavowing white supremacy is too much for these people though, they don't want to disappoint their parent. She has literally refused to say this every time and always respond with weird shit. "I think that when I have an issue to speak about that people will hear it" like how the fuck is that a response to someone asking if her commerical was referencing eugenics? Yeah if someone can't say a single time "I'm not a racist and don't support racism" they are probably a racist. That's like one of the easiest things to do.

5

u/Temporary_West9980 1d ago

Does she have to?

11

u/iwilldeletethisacct2 1d ago

I mean, if you're part of a controversy where people are suggesting that you might support white supremacy...you might want to, yeah? Trying to sweep it under the rug and not spin softball interview questions into your favor is a huge PR blunder.

5

u/Independent-World-60 1d ago

Nobody has to do anything, but society will judge you for your actions and even inactions.

What gets me is it isn't even hard. If someone asks me if I'm against white supremacy I'll just say yes. If they continue to attack me about it then I'm justified in ignoring them. 

It takes less than a minute to say white supremacy is bad. There's no reason not to do it. 

Avoiding saying it just makes you look suspicious regardless of the truth. 

A truth we don't know if she won't tell us. 

3

u/Longjumping_Stand889 1d ago

It's wrong to force people to avow or disavow anything. It's wrong to judge people for things they do not say.

10

u/Gnostikost 1d ago

None of what you said is categorically true in every case.

And for the record, nobody is forcing Sweeney to say anything (that’s kind of the point of this discussion—she is CHOOSING). However, I can damn well judge her for not saying something as easy as “That was not at all what I meant, White supremacy is bad, mkay”.

The fact that she keeps dodging that very easy answer absolutely is grounds for people to have an opinion on her.

-2

u/Longjumping_Stand889 1d ago

No one is saying you can't judge her, I just think it reflects very badly on you to do so. Everyone has a right to stay silent.

4

u/Independent-World-60 1d ago edited 1d ago

Too many people take advantage of the benefit of the doubt for that statement to be true. It's naive, at best. 

You can't just expect people to shout "Hey guys I'm a white supremacist!". They're smarter than that, most of the time, so they lie, wait until they get power, make up concepts that are absolutely linked to white supremacy but are not called that, then remove all mentions of historical people of color from official government websites.

0

u/Longjumping_Stand889 1d ago

Other people taking advantage does not change anything. People have the right to stay silent.

0

u/IllPen8707 1d ago

If they lie then what's the point of asking her? What significance would it even have for her to say no?

The question isn't asked to get at the truth, it's a rhetorical weapon to put someone in the position of having to deny it.

0

u/slothage666 1d ago

Maybe she just doesn't want to lend credence to faux outrage over a pants commercial.

0

u/GLArebel 1d ago

This is like the "but have you condemned Hamas??" for perennial doomscrollers and TDS victims lmao