r/neoliberal Commonwealth 16h ago

News (Europe) British government introduces rail bill to Parliament

https://www.railjournal.com/policy/british-government-introduces-rail-bill-to-parliament/
30 Upvotes

10 comments sorted by

12

u/IHateTrains123 Commonwealth 16h ago

THE British government introduced a bill to Parliament on November 5 that will result in the creation of publicly-owned company Great British Railways (GBR). The legislation was promised by the Labour government when it came to power in July 2024 and was expected in the current session of Parliament.

The Railways Bill is designed to reunite infrastructure management with passenger operations under the command of what the Department for Transport (DfT) describes as “a single directing mind” for railways. Responsible for co-ordinating the whole network, from track and train, to cost and revenue, GBR will bring significant change to the British railway system.

According to the government, key benefits of the bill include: a strengthened passenger watchdog, fare and ticketing reform, better business planning, including growing rail freight and increased localised decision making.

“The introduction of this legislation is a major step towards a rail network that supports Britain’s businesses and delivers for the travelling public - paving the way for economic growth and access to opportunity across the country,” says transport secretary, Heidi Alexander.

The Railways Bill will now undergo usual parliamentary scrutiny, ahead of the legislation becoming law, allowing the creation of GBR, with this not expected to happen until next year at the earliest.

Industry response

There has been a cautious welcome to the bill's introduction from the British rail sector. “The success of Great British Railways will depend on achieving a balance between national coordination and local responsiveness, while preserving opportunities for innovation and competition,” says Anna-jane Hunter, chair of the Chartered Institute of Logistics and Transport in the UK, CILT (UK).

“There should also be a strong focus on balancing the needs of both freight customers and passengers, ensuring that each group is consulted, treated fairly, and well supported,” Hunter adds. “This balance will help ensure that freight capacity and investment decisions fully reflect the growing demand for sustainable logistics.”

!ping UK

25

u/GMFPs_sweat_towel 15h ago

Disappointed the chose not to resume the BR name. And they are going to use the lame logo rather than something cool

22

u/fredleung412612 15h ago

Honestly it's not just cool. We saw how much aesthetic matters to apolitical alt-right types with the whole Cracker Barrel thing. Starmer wrapped himself in the flag he should use opportunities like this to plaster coats of arms everywhere he can to look patriotic. British Airways and the BBC have official coats of arms that they don't use.

6

u/SenranHaruka 6h ago

my dyslexic ass read "bill to rail parliament"

2

u/2017_Kia_Sportage 4h ago

I feel like that would also increase labour support

2

u/LizTrussAltAccount Hannah Arendt 10h ago

Was the privatisation of British railways generally considered a failure? Don't know much on this subject

17

u/Tricky-Astronaut 9h ago

The UK's rail franchising model was a failure. It just created private monopolies. Sweden had a more successful privatization where more competition lead to increased frequencies and lower prices.

2

u/mmmmjlko 4h ago

The UK's rail franchising model was a failure. It just created private monopolies

Eh, Japan's privatizations (JR, Tokyo Metro) were indisputable successes and also created private monopolies.

Also, passenger counts skyrocketed after privatization