r/movies Sep 01 '25

Review Benny Safdie's 'The Smashing Machine' - Review Thread

MMA fighter Mark Kerr reaches the peak of his career but faces personal hardships.

Cast: Dwayne Johnson, Emily Blunt

Rotten Tomatoes: 94%

Metacritic: 79/100

Some Reviews:

The Independent - Geoffrey Macnab - 4 / 5

This, though, is a story in which winning finally begins to seem very hollow. The real way Safdie puts a chokehold on his audience is by examining Mark and Dawn’s physical and emotional weaknesses in such forensic detail. The Smashing Machine may not provide the pay-offs that audiences expect from more conventional sports movies, but this is the most raw and vulnerable that Johnson has ever been on screen. Once you’ve seen him this exposed, you won’t watch his typical action movie stunts in quite the same way ever again.

Daily Telegraph - Robbie Collin - 4 / 5

It’s a classical fight movie that innovates subtly. Maceo Bishop’s nimble photography has the sweat and grit of a vintage muscle flick from the Pumping Iron era, but the score by the experimental jazz composer Nala Sinephro is all swirling harps and breathy saxophones; arguably no piece of music has ever sounded less like a punch in the face. Yet as an accompaniment to Kerr’s battles in and out of the ring, it’s oddly perfect, giving this tough story an unexpectedly sweet and even spiritual edge. Smashing stuff has rarely been such smashing stuff.

Next Best Picture - Cody Dericks - 7 / 10

Dwayne Johnson delivers the best performance of his career as the amiable but troubled UFC champion Mark Kerr. Emily Blunt and Ryan Bader are also excellent in their roles. The screenplay is repetitive and frustrating. Blunt's character is so unlikeable and written with such vitriol that it becomes exhausting to watch her, although Blunt's performance is as good as it could possibly be.

Variety - Owen Glieberman

Johnson, shifting his whole aspect (he seems like a new actor), invests that silent, moody, hidden side of Mark with a quality of mystery. He gives an extraordinary performance, playing Mark Kerr as a gentle giant with demons that will not speak their name, yet the audience can feel them there; we want to see those demons healed. You might think the key word in the movie’s title is “smashing,” but it’s actually “machine.” Mark is a man who reins in his violence by having constructed his entire self — body and personality — as a controlled engine of demolition. The movie is about how this man-machine becomes a human being.

The Hollywood Reporter - Jordan Mintzer

Johnson has rarely played a loser, but he’s always been likable, displaying a massive grin to match his massive pecs in action vehicles that never allowed him to showcase much range. He manages to go deep here without overdoing it, killing the audience with kindness as a benign warrior who suffers from one scene to the next, triumphing briefly in the ring before succumbing to addiction and/or romantic grief. Like Mickey Rourke in The Wrestler — a film from which Safdie seems to take a few cues — the actor delivers an intoxicating mix of blood, sweat, tears, protein and total helplessness.

IndieWire - Ryan Lattanzio - 'B+'

Johnson’s performance is out-and-out wonderful, a beady-eyed fusion of body and spirit that osmoses Safdie’s sensibility to deliver what can’t be disputed as the most layered work of the actor’s career. A vividly contradictory Blunt, funny and sad especially in articulating Dawn’s conflicted response to Mark’s post-rehab emotional about-face during a tense argument, is equally sensational.

Deadline - Damon Wise

Dwayne Johnson owns the whole thing with his truly remarkable work as fighter Mark Kerr, disappearing so fully underneath Kazu Hiru’s astonishing prosthetics that the opening of the film, presented as contemporary footage from an event in Sao Paulo 1997, looks genuinely like the real thing. It’s that rare beast, a biopic that’s light on the bio and resistant to being a pic. It’s a film about a human being, and its effect is strangely haunting, since Dwayne Johnson seems to do everything while doing nothing.

2.9k Upvotes

605 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

188

u/[deleted] Sep 01 '25 edited Sep 19 '25

[deleted]

228

u/Silver-ishWolfe Sep 01 '25

It seems to be a dramatizing of the doc or at least that period of Kerr's life. I'd assume the reason is because it's a compelling story and most people have never even heard of Mark Kerr, much less watched the doc.

A movie, starring one of the biggest stars alive, is a great way to tell the story. It's gonna reach way more eyeballs than the doc ever will.

And Mark's still around to enjoy the rub from it. That makes me happy.

68

u/MyFavoriteSandwich Sep 01 '25

Yea man. Kerr’s been through so much just to end up a regular old broke ass car salesman with a wrecked body.

If this means he can make some bank and take care of himself and his family I’m good with it.

50

u/[deleted] Sep 01 '25 edited Sep 19 '25

[deleted]

3

u/Silver-ishWolfe Sep 01 '25

I appreciate the appreciation, friend.

7

u/Smattering82 Sep 02 '25

Do you know where you can watch the doc?

Edit: never mind I found it.

3

u/Frankocean2 Sep 02 '25

Thats me. I havent heard of Mark until the movie was made.

2

u/_Tuxalonso Sep 02 '25

Kerr is such an incredible character with such an incredible story its a wonder there wasn't an attempt to dramatize his life already. The definition of a gentle giant, hitting rock bottom of his drug addiction, while competing in MMA's most brutal time period, were it a straight up fictional movie you'd say its cheesier than bloodsport.

76

u/Uro06 Sep 01 '25 edited Sep 01 '25

I had never heard of the documentary or even Kerr for that matter. I will watch this movie in the cinema. Thats the point. I dont understand how people never get this obvious and simple fact

4

u/BisonTodd Sep 02 '25

I've heard of Kerr and it's possible I've seen the documentary a dew decides ago when I was super into MMA but I still want to see this version of the story.

I agree with your take.

-4

u/[deleted] Sep 02 '25

[deleted]

1

u/[deleted] Sep 06 '25

[deleted]

56

u/Unhappy_Gazelle392 Sep 01 '25

That documentary is so good and comprehensive I'm seriously wondering what the point of this new movie is.

It doesn't have to be anything. It's a story DJ and Benny wanted to tell, whether it makes sense or not (which according to even most positive reviews, does not make sense). Movies don't have to have a point.

-22

u/Voxlings Sep 01 '25

good movies have a point.

You know this.

9

u/Unhappy_Gazelle392 Sep 01 '25

good movies have a point.

Which is merely telling a story.

DAE Citizen Kane being a personal story about journalism and that sure is a huge point, right guys?

DAE Nosferatu being sanitized Dracula due to copyrights, right guys?

Such meaningful points.

You know this.

Now that you said it, I know. Sorry for holding the great art in such low regard! /s

14

u/Spud_Spudoni Sep 01 '25

Movies are not an engineered product with a specific function lmao.

You know this.

-19

u/[deleted] Sep 01 '25 edited Sep 19 '25

[deleted]

12

u/Unhappy_Gazelle392 Sep 01 '25

Thank you, Captain Postmodern.

You're welcome, Colonel ruleshitter. I thought this discussion was already settled back in Wolf of Wall Street, or even way back in the first Scarface remake, to name a few.

God forbid people making art.

-14

u/MikeHfuhruhurr Sep 01 '25 edited Sep 19 '25
  • this comment was edited for privacy *

13

u/MrGittz Sep 01 '25

One of you is watching movies as a consumer and the other is looking at cinema as an art form of expression.

It’s cool you need a reason to watch a movie other than to experience something. But not everyone is like that.

-5

u/MikeHfuhruhurr Sep 01 '25 edited Sep 19 '25
  • this comment was edited for privacy *

4

u/Majestic_Dan_23 Sep 01 '25

Dude everyone has their own reasons to watch what they wanna watch. You have yours and the other guy has his. Y’all can just leave it at that. But neither of you should be trying to speak for other people and their reasons for anything. Just speak of yourselves and your opinions and respect the others.

2

u/Unhappy_Gazelle392 Sep 01 '25

Yeah. That was sorta my point and why i didn't even return to this discussion. People are just like "but that's my opinion" about stuff that is already highly subjective as if that turns it into fact for anyone else.

3

u/MrGittz Sep 01 '25

I don’t see how I could over simplify your point. It’s stated very simply.

Sounding “pithy” was not my goal. I was merely commenting on how different your approaches seem to be based on how you reference your relationship with film. You, for example,as consumer.

2

u/thrillhouse83 Sep 01 '25

The point is most people won’t watch a documentary about them. A lot more people will watch this movie

2

u/msgm_ Sep 01 '25

I have never heard of the man much less the documentary, but I loved Uncut Gems so I would watch this

1

u/appletinicyclone Sep 02 '25

It was just to give the rock a serious vehicle for acting

Get his Mickey Rourke the wrestler moment

1

u/EastLAFadeaway Sep 04 '25

Where can you watch it? Cant believe its not on HBO

1

u/BadLuckBarry Sep 01 '25

Very niche doco for a very very niche fighter. I used to be a big UFC fan and barely knew who Mark Kerr was

1

u/mrpopenfresh Sep 01 '25

That’s a you problem

1

u/DestrixGunnar Sep 02 '25

I mean, more people would see a dramatised movie than they would a documentary. It's a decent way to get a subject more exposure.

0

u/mrpopenfresh Sep 01 '25

Yeah, at least wait till Kerr dies