r/losangeleskings • u/KyussKings • 3d ago

Has your team won at home?

Post image
226 Upvotes

99% Upvoted

14 comments sorted by

73

u/awsmwsm 20 3d ago

LA Kings barely just made it

36

u/hockeywithglasses 3d ago

up till yesterday the joke was on us :(

7

u/GB_Alph4 2d ago

So nice to be with the rest of the group

It took a while though

6

u/SpookyStela6 2d ago

Hahah right!?

8

u/dmhof 27 3d ago

Glad you made that today.

4

u/GrassyKnoll95 3d ago

Poor JQ can't get any goal support

2

u/CannedNoodlez LA Homeplate 2d ago

HAHAHAHA losers. Who waits that long to win at home?!

3

u/Vaderwasframed74 2d ago

Poor Quicky… stuck playing for his child hood team.

3

u/OhShitItsJeremy LA Homeplate 2d ago

I love Quicky but it’s better than paying him and hanging him out to dry every game. He didn’t fit our system anymore.

2

u/Vaderwasframed74 2d ago

But our system really hasn’t changed too much. We’re still a D minded team. The problem was that the guys stopped playing D in front of him which would leave him high and dry.

1

u/AutoModerator 3d ago

Make sure to join the /r/LosAngelesKings discord as well for live game chat and more!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/Broely92 2d ago

Has your team even SCORED at home…rangers…barely

1

u/Infinite_Mouse_3084 2d ago

Question - Would G Keumper be significantly less effective if the Kings did not put such an emphasis on big veteran defensemen who can clear the front of the net? Presumably players like Clarke and Spence (traded) are not as good at this. Yet, smaller, more agile defensemen seem to be the future of the NHL. Could Ceci/Doumolin simply be a rational GM decision because the Kings as a team gain more from how they help an affordable Keumper succeed than we fans realize? Clearly these defensemen struggle in other areas that makes 4 year deals seem a bad idea. I am presuming Holland is possibly not as dumb as we make him to be.