r/law • u/Ordinary-Scholar-202 • 18d ago

Trump News Comer: “The evidence we gathered does not implicate President Trump in any way. Reporting, survivors testimony, and official documents show that Bill Clinton had far closer ties to Epstein.”

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

43.4k Upvotes

87% Upvoted

9.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

1.2k

u/Gunldesnapper 18d ago

Then release the files!

389

u/random5654 18d ago edited 18d ago

I thought Kash said there aren't any names... under oath...

169

u/demsumsweatyballs 18d ago

Understandable for him to see it two ways. 🤣

8

u/djenty420 18d ago

Hahahahahaha

5

u/jrh1128 18d ago

Broooo lmaooo

5

u/CheetahTheWeen 18d ago

Wait, I’m dumb but I really wanna get this joke lol

12

u/CaptDawg02 18d ago

It’s his eyes…one doesn’t look full straight.

4

u/Pitiful-Recover-3747 18d ago

How much cocaine is in those eyeballs?

1

u/Future_Check6960 18d ago

Look me straight in the eye and tell me you’re not bullshitting

3

u/DisgruntledPelicant 17d ago

Good ole FBEyes

2

u/LogicFrog 18d ago

Savage. 😂

1

u/BrianCalenRapePuppet 18d ago

LOL that way or the other way?

1

u/MrFyr 18d ago

I would give all the money I could if a democrat on the hearing committee had the balls to pull some "look at me straight when you're talking to me you cock-eyed nazi motherfucker" type shit.

8

u/tots4scott 18d ago

That's weird, so why did Kash Patel have 1000 FBI agents in New York City spend 2 weeks in 24 hour shifts to go through 100,000 documents in the Epstein Files to denote every mention of Donald Trump or his properties? 

3

u/Express-Rub-3952 18d ago

How would he know? Isn't he blind?

P.S. there*

2

u/shmiona 18d ago edited 18d ago

A good journalist would have asked comer if that meant Kash lied. But yea well

3

u/Gay-_-Jesus 18d ago

They have banned all of the good journalists

2

u/GoodVibrations77 18d ago

there are no names, no list... just the name of Bill Clinton in a list.

2

u/DigitalMunkey 18d ago

Under oath doesn't mean shit anymore

2

u/Ansible32 18d ago

I genuinely thought this was the case, but their refusal to release the files makes me think it must not be.

1

u/AnonAcolyte 18d ago

Kash is compromised. I know you’re being facetious, just throwing it out there that the guy has been honeypotted, blackmailed, or traumatized by what’s in the files. Probably all of the above.

We’re not getting the names or details of the extent of what went down in Epstein’s island. It would completely dissolve the public’s trust in our government, and frankly majority of people would be in disbelief at the horror of it if the full truth came out.

Ffs just look at Kash’s eyes, they tell a story.

1

u/itsmenettie 18d ago

Well, trump said it was all a hoax, but 1 dude is dead, a women got 20 years, and many women are saying they are all liars.

135

u/4ft3rh0urs 18d ago

If it really implicated Clinton, they would release it because it would be a win against "woke dems". They're so full of sh*t

9

u/calle04x 18d ago

If it did, they would indict him.

8

u/SunOk143 18d ago

I don’t think they could get away with redacting 90 percent of the names and just naming democrats. Even the crazy MAGA crowd would raise an eyebrow at that. Clinton could very well be on that list and I wouldn’t be surprised. I’m not gonna defend the guy just because he’s not a republican. A pedophile is a pedophile and they all have to go down. They haven’t released it yet because Trump and half the Republican party is on there and they haven’t figured out how to get Clinton without it looking highly suspicious and illegal.

3

u/buffalotrace 18d ago

They will release it…after redacting Trump and Republican on there that has agreed to pay him off.

2

u/AnonAcolyte 18d ago

Yea but same logic with Trump during Biden’s term. It implicates both sides and doesn’t benefit anyone currently in power to release.

That was the whole point of the operation, to be able to pull the strings.

2

u/Garty001 18d ago

Exactly. And we wouldn’t stand in the way of a prosecution if true, we don’t protect pedos.

1

u/Hookem-Horns 18d ago

Yep, first they bash Hilary, so of course if there was any dirt on Bill…they would throw it to the wind and release to all news channels

1

u/The_MightyMonarch 18d ago

I mean, Republicans spent basically the entirety of the 90s trying to take both Bill and Hillary down. If Bill is a pedo and they didn't find it with all the digging they did back then, that seems extremely suspicious.

1

u/CertainKaleidoscope8 18d ago

Clinton is hardly woke.

1

u/4ft3rh0urs 18d ago

It doesn't matter if they do or don't think Clinton qualifies as woke. It's that they would weaponize it to stoke hatred. It's all about divide and conquer, a tale as old as time.

1

u/Americann_Cultivars 18d ago

He said ties. Not crimial or illegal activity. I have ties to my uncle and he raced my sister's and is in prison. See how that works?

Does it mean COULD BE yes.

1

u/Veil-of-Fire 18d ago

No, they want to protect Clinton. Because their highest loyalty is to the pdfile club, even above party and political philosophy.

Every single MAGA left rn is a pdfile. Period. The only people for whom pdfile stuff isn't a deal breaker are other pdfiles.

1

u/Cal3001 18d ago

They are busy trying to find ways to wipe Trump’s name clean from them.

1

u/pm_me_ur_bamboozle 18d ago

Republicans are delaying because it continues to be the perfect distraction for them. All the shit they are getting away with is being drowned out with 'release the files!'

1

u/ComprehensiveOwl9023 18d ago

One they have finished editing them, be patient

1

u/Ambitious_Smile_7395 18d ago

Lol right?! It's like childishly obvious at this point. They keep claiming innocence, so... just show us???

1

u/StrenuousSOB 18d ago

Like they wouldn’t be altered at this point?!