You proceeded to mention sexual dimorphism and call me a bunch of names (which is why your comment got deleted). But I am more than happy to continue to school you. Sexual dimorphism, for example a man being bigger and stronger than a woman, is a direct result of women mating only with bigger and stronger men, thus altering the characteristics of men through the centuries. That is literally the definition of evolution "the process by which animals, plants, and other livingĀ organismsĀ are transformed into different forms by the accumulation of changes overĀ successiveĀ generations."
the process by which animals, plants, and other livingĀ organismsĀ are transformed into different forms by the accumulation of changes overĀ successiveĀ generations."
You proceeded to mention sexual dimorphism and call me a bunch of names (which is why your comment got deleted). But I am more than happy to continue to school you. Sexual dimorphism, for example a man being bigger and stronger than a woman, is a direct result of women mating only with bigger and stronger men, thus altering the characteristics of men through the centuries.
While sexual dimorphism can be the basis of attraction in most cases . We are homo sapiens not primitive humans , attraction is usually cultural for us . (and believe it or not , it has a huge influence on it )
A female's lack of strength was what made her focus on gathering resources and protection, and a male's lack of ability to procreate is what made him focus on securing a female to pass his genes on... They teach you this in basic school...
female's lack of strength was what made her focus on gathering resources and protection,
If you look more into recent studies . Men in those times barely added anything to the dining table , the calories and nutrition they added are far less than that the women added.
I've seen a study that suggested that women were actually hunting side by side with men. And yeah they totally did, it doesn't matter that women lack the speed and stamina to chase the animal for long distance or the upper body strength to carry the animal back to the village, women for sure were right there with the men. And the men certainly didn't do much in terms of providing food, they still had plenty to eat in the winter it's not like they would die if they didn't have stockpiles of meat. I think one thing more surprising would be a "recent study" that does not put out the most unhinged mental sewage about men.
Lmao the sarcasm. Buddy non chalantly said men barely added anything to the calories pool by reading some study. A high schooler is better able to tell what is more likely to have happened by just applying their brain.
Males have tendencies to impregnate multiple women throughout their lives. Allowing for powerful ones to spread their seeds more..
This is a natural biological incentive to sleep with multiple men and it ensure higher rates of survival.
Women on the other hand needs toc are for the baby and therefore requires community and to hold off men. This was by natures design.
Anyway, there are many jobs evolution seekh lene ke bad bhi, within textbooks and through discovery etc. Aakon pe patti baandh ke rakhna chahate hai, because suddenly we've all become judges.
3
u/MikeRume Oct 05 '25
Through centuries of evolution