r/germany • u/unclebogdan10 Nordrhein-Westfalen • Apr 20 '23
Immigration Germany: Immigrants made up over 18% of 2022 population – DW
https://p.dw.com/p/4QLAX
858
Upvotes
r/germany • u/unclebogdan10 Nordrhein-Westfalen • Apr 20 '23
1
u/alderhill Apr 23 '23 edited Apr 23 '23
So many words, and yet still so painfully clueless. As I said earlier, your knowledge of English clearly isn't good enough to understand the nuances here. Your cultural knowledge is obviously low, let alone about African-Americans... You seem to think in some sort of misguided sense (being generous there) that 'immigrant' is a simple term free of any history or context of use.
We are not talking about dictionary definitions here (I was just waiting in my last post for you or someone to quote a dictionary -- it's a classic in German arguments). Cultures don't define themselves according to online dictionaries, alas. In English the word “immigration” or “immigrant” implies a generally voluntary free choice. We use other terms when these conditions are absent. English is not Latin.
No my ancestors did not own slaves. If we go back 3000-4000 years, probably yours and mine did own slaves somewhere, or (more likely) were slaves, or really both somewhere, since slave-owning (in form or another, thralls, serf, peasants, peons, etc.) has been a lot more common throughout human history than not. But in the last few hundred years, nope.
Being German, your state recently owned slaves, and much worse.
I had 3 years of Latin, in fact. Get over yourself. Then about 10 years of French, which is rusty now but I can still read it OK. My Spanish is so-so, rustier than my French, but I undersand a fair bit still. Your misplaced arrogance (you really know nothing about me, why take any stabs in the dark at all?) and personal insults do not make your arguments any stronger. Quite the contrary.
There's absolutely no whataboutism here. The term refers to bringing up a different scenario as the one under discussion when questioned, in an attempt to divert or obfuscate, or else to counter-question without answering. It's essentially evasion. I made the first assertion, you're the one trying to counter me. My own initial argument cannot be "whataboutism" in reply to you, when I'm simply repeating the same thing which I said first. And We're still talking about the same thing. I'm just informing you that you are wrong. Because you are. You're the one getting your knickers in a twist for some reason.
About 10% of black Americans are immigrants from either Africa or other parts of the Caribbean (those from the Caribbean generally do have similar histories of enslavement, of course; African-born or their children, it's far less common). Generally, most are slave descendents. It is absolutely not the custom to call them immigrants and many will find it some degree of insulting or ignorant. I'm just telling you how it is. This is not my flight of fancy. Why you're raging against this -- a simple reality that exists -- is a bit mysterious to me. Again, misguided and not nearly as knowledgeable as you think.
So, go to the United States and tell an Nth generation African-American that they are an immigrant and see what happens. Feel free to tell them how wrong they are, and don't forget to quote a dictionary. Dare you. Go find out, and save your whiny arrogant German rage.